Siggy Brentrup wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 08:28 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 08:24, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
>>> And if for whatever reason somebody wants to see your list disfunctional,
>>> you open an easy way to do so by implementing a bot that reports every
>>> message
Quoting Siggy Brentrup (deb...@psycho.i21k.de):
> > This can be done by *anyone*, DDs and non, and all are encouraged to
> > do so. It's fundamental to have reports: without them we have a false
> > sense of spam-free mailing lists, when we all know it's not true.
>
> And if for whatever reason s
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 08:33, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 08:28 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 08:24, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
>> > And if for whatever reason somebody wants to see your list disfunctional,
>> > you open an easy way to do so by implementing a bo
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 08:28 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 08:24, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
> > And if for whatever reason somebody wants to see your list disfunctional,
> > you open an easy way to do so by implementing a bot that reports every
> > message as spam. Do you volunte
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC:
debian-devel@lists.debian.org,pkg-scicomp-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org,debian-scie...@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: madlib
Version: 1.2.2
Upstream Author: "Jean-François Remacle" ,
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 08:24, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 08:48 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 01:39, brian m.
>> carlson wrote:
>> > On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 02:24:28AM +0300, Eugene Gorodinsky wrote:
>> >> Is there any way to actually make it harder to spam
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 08:48 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 01:39, brian m.
> carlson wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 02:24:28AM +0300, Eugene Gorodinsky wrote:
> >> Is there any way to actually make it harder to spam the list? I just
> >> subscribed and already see spam and
Am Montag, den 03.08.2009, 16:51 + schrieb Anthony Towns:
> amd64 has d-i support, surely? it did for lenny, despite lenny's
> page...
Yes it does and still works fine (at least for me).
--
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-d
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 02:05:22AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Cyril Brulebois writes:
>
> > Goswin von Brederlow (03/08/2009):
> >> Does it break aptitude too?
> >
> > I think that people involved in serious things like multiarch and glibc
> > might appreciate your staying quiet at som
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 09:21:53PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Bastian Blank writes:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:38:32AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >> Bastian Blank a écrit :
> >> > What happens if someone install libc-bin without a new libc6 then?
> >> > Forgot about that vari
Daniel Pittman writes:
> 403 Forbidden: You don't have permission to access
> /~rlb/tmp/emacs23/emacs23_23.1+1-2_i386.changes on this server.
OK, that should be fixed now, though I may just take the packages down
since it looks like they've made it to unstable.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defa
Le Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 06:18:57PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
>
> > The patch is not in unified format, which causes the failure of
> > dpkg-buildpackage. It is trivial to refresh it with quilt to the unified
> > format, but this introduces a divergence with upstream that I would prefer
> >
Cyril Brulebois writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow (03/08/2009):
>> Does it break aptitude too?
>
> I think that people involved in serious things like multiarch and glibc
> might appreciate your staying quiet at some point given the quite huge
> mess you initially created. But maybe that's just me.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:07 PM, martin f krafft wrote:
> No, but maybe we can revive it? Would you write to the domain owner?
It is now a spam site so that may be costly or impossible.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian
Goswin von Brederlow (03/08/2009):
> Does it break aptitude too?
I think that people involved in serious things like multiarch and glibc
might appreciate your staying quiet at some point given the quite huge
mess you initially created. But maybe that's just me.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Descri
Bastian Blank writes:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:38:32AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> Bastian Blank a écrit :
>> > What happens if someone install libc-bin without a new libc6 then?
>> > Forgot about that variant before as it is not forbidden by deps now.
>> If it is not the same major vers
Hello Muammar
I understand you also .. The only purpose of my post was to warn the
person concerned had an error in package dependencies that uploaded to
the sid branch in order that he might realize the problem and correct
the package
My intentions have been good at all times.
El lun, 03-08-2
also sprach Maximiliano Curia [2009.08.03.1529 +0200]:
> distrodev.org seems to have died sometime around 2007, do you know
> if there is any "replacement" for this?
No, but maybe we can revive it? Would you write to the domain owner?
--
.''`. martin f. krafft Related projects:
: :' :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Kevin M. Rosenberg"
* Package name: cl-fftw3
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Kevin Rosenberg
* URL : http://files.b9.com/cl-fftw3/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Common Lisp
Description : A Common Lisp int
On Sun, 02 Aug 2009, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I see that .bzip2 and .lzma are also supported compression methods for the 3.0
> (native) format as well as for the binary packages. But I do not think it
> would
> be useful to add zip to this list. It seems to me that the only thing needed
> is
> the
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 05:39:23AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> So, http://release.debian.org/squeeze/arch_qualify.html lists kfreebsd-*
> and m68k as not release candidates, and arm, ia64, mips and powerpc as
> "at risk" in addition to alpha and hppa. Only m68k is listed as having
> RM concerns.
Package: wnpp
Owner: Jonathan Yu
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libtest-subcalls-perl
Version : 1.09
Upstream Author : Adam Kennedy
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-SubCalls/
* License : Artistic | GPL-1+
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 03:31:57PM +0200, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 03:08:02AM +0200, Meike Reichle wrote:
> >> Debian decides to adopt time-based release freezes
> >
> > I believe this is a positive step. ??However, I'm
Great! Anything I could help with, please let me know.
On Sat, 2009-08-01 at 13:52 -0700, Rob Browning wrote:
> I've uploaded the first emacs23 packages (23.1+1-1) to unstable. Please
> file bugs as appropriate.
>
> Note that we have also begun the process of removing emacs21 from
> unstable/tes
Your explanation seems fine. In the meantime, I'll try to work on
something more suitable, maybe getting build-depends as array or hash
members, I dunno. anyways, thanks for you to answer.
On Sat, 2009-08-01 at 11:12 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:01:36AM -0400, Adrian P
o<,
so people noticed this discussion and brought it up on #blendercoders,
where I just had a tiny chat. It looks like they agreed that the ffmpeg
situation is quite unfortunate (that's the most problematic external
embedded library we both could think of), but there are some technical
stuff that
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 03:08:02AM +0200, Meike Reichle wrote:
>> -
>> The Debian Project http://www.debian.org/
>> Debian adopts time-ba
Hola martin f krafft!
El 03/08/2009 a las 10:48 escribiste:
> Without doubt, upstream should be the place where cross-distro
> integration happens. However, if upstream is not interested, then
> the idea of vcs-pkg is to have a repo used by all distros, which is
> suitable for everyone. It doesn't
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 03:08:02AM +0200, Meike Reichle wrote:
> -
> The Debian Project http://www.debian.org/
> Debian adopts time-based release freezes pr...@debian.org
> J
On 2009-08-02 10:16 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2009-08-02 09:58 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>> * Rob Browning:
>>
>>> I've uploaded the first emacs23 packages (23.1+1-1) to unstable. Please
>>> file bugs as appropriate.
>>
>> Has anybody else experienced the FTBFS related to the removal o
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:38:32AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Bastian Blank a écrit :
> > What happens if someone install libc-bin without a new libc6 then?
> > Forgot about that variant before as it is not forbidden by deps now.
> If it is not the same major version, it will probably break, I'
Tollef Fog Heen writes:
> ]] Roger Leigh
>
> | Having working local networking is important. We wouldn't consider
> | broken IPv4 loopback acceptable, and broken IPv6 loopback is just as
> | bad.
>
> Sure, having it working is important. Is it more important than keeping
> those (often new) use
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Ok, you've got it unless you find someone else. Probably best to give
> it a few days for others to raise their hand as well.
Looks like I'm stuck with it :-)
I'll first contact Goswin privately for some practical matters and then
decide on how to maintain the packa
Bastian Blank a écrit :
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 02:02:24AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> I have finally decided to remove the Depends: line in libc-bin, even if
>> I don't really like that. My tests show that it works now, but don't
>> hesitate to test it on your machine.
>
> What happens if s
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 02:02:24AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> I have finally decided to remove the Depends: line in libc-bin, even if
> I don't really like that. My tests show that it works now, but don't
> hesitate to test it on your machine.
What happens if someone install libc-bin without a
Vincent Danjean wrote:
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Charles Plessy wrote:
I see that .bzip2 and .lzma are also supported compression methods for the 3.0
(native) format as well as for the binary packages. But I do not think it would
be useful to add zip to this list. It seems to me that the on
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 10:36 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> I doubt there is much style left in the code.
Thanks for this helpful line :)
Siggy
--
Please don't Cc: me when replying, I might not see either copy.
bsb-at-psycho-dot-informationsanarchistik-dot-de
Charles Plessy writes:
> Another question that I would like to ask is on the auto-patching
> functionality. One of the programs we package, EMBOSS, is released once a
> year
> every 15th of July, and other updates are made via patches. Currently it is
> possible to just give the patch to quilt
also sprach Cyril Brulebois [2009.08.02.2130 +0200]:
> Before going deeper into it, I have to say I've been trying to
> resist the urge of going public with it, and coping with my duties
> as much as I could. But it's just too much now. Members of the
> French Cabal (which of course doesn't exist)
Steve Langasek writes:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:30:33PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> >> Moreover, this is not the only exception. Thousands of desktop and server
>> >> packages that contains executable binaries (applications) compiled from
>> >> C/C++/Pascal/etc. also have arch-depen
Siggy Brentrup writes:
> Hi,
>
> sorry for the late reply, we were celebrating my wife's birthday at
> the seaside until yesterday late in the evenign.
>
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 17:53 +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
>> On Fri Jul 31, 2009 at 18:47:58 +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
>>
>> > Who wrote deb
[ moving discussion to -project. Please follow up on -devel if you are
contributing to the technical discussion and -project for the project
wide parts ]
Cyril Brulebois writes:
> It's been a while and I'm now really wondering what to do with
> Blender. So that everyone can understand, I'm
42 matches
Mail list logo
