]] Eugene Gorodinsky
| I also think some abstraction from the actual filesystem is a good
| idea. For example currently the only way to install a lib in a
| directory other than the one it was intended for is by using a hack
| that would look at the directory of a file and move it somewhere. It
|
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 01:39, brian m.
carlson wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 02:24:28AM +0300, Eugene Gorodinsky wrote:
>> Is there any way to actually make it harder to spam the list? I just
>> subscribed and already see spam and phishing attacks...
>
> Yes. There are infinitely many ways to m
Hi Frans:
First of all, thanks very much for stepping up and offering to help
maintain this package! :-)
I should mention I've never used debmirror, and thus don't feel that I
would make for a very competent maintainer of it. Nonetheless, I feel
I'd be remiss if I didn't offer to help out, though
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 02:48:37AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Ryan Niebur (30/07/2009):
> > would you mind providing a .deb of that so that I can test and update
> > my dh build system patch to use it?
>
> waf deb? Check first mail in the thread.
>
ok, I misunderstood what Luca was saying.
the easy usecase to me would be -- to install that package in every
Debian guest, adjust my bash/zsh configuration so if the tool is present
-- embed its output into the prompt. for now I use
/etc/debian_chroot within chroots to alert myself that 'I am not at
home' ;)
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Russell
Le Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:01:36AM -0400, Adrian Perez a écrit :
> There's any plan of supporting another format - without breaking
> compatibility, I mean supporting - besides the RFC one?
> I think YAML would be a good one.
Hello Adrian,
I thought about YAML for machine-readable license summar
Xmission Webmail Technical Services-
Account Subscriber,
We are currently performing maintenance on our Digital webmail Server to
improve the spam filter services in our webmail systems for better online
services to avoid virus and spam mails. In order to ensure you do not
expe
Le Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 03:20:46PM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi a écrit :
>
> Anyway RH has support to install packages in own homes. This kind of
> abstraction could be nice to have.
Hi all,
I would really love to have such a functionality in apt. At work, we use shared
workstations that run old
Le Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 03:32:43PM +0300, Eugene Gorodinsky a écrit :
>
> Currently debian policy is to have a .desktop file for each GUI
> program. What would be better, IMHO, is having some sort of
> abstraction, so that the package manager itself would create a
> .desktop file entry, given an i
Ryan Niebur (30/07/2009):
> would you mind providing a .deb of that so that I can test and update
> my dh build system patch to use it?
waf deb? Check first mail in the thread.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 02:24:28AM +0300, Eugene Gorodinsky wrote:
> Is there any way to actually make it harder to spam the list? I just
> subscribed and already see spam and phishing attacks...
Yes. There are infinitely many ways to make it harder to spam the list,
among them:
* Allowing posti
Is there any way to actually make it harder to spam the list? I just
subscribed and already see spam and phishing attacks...
2009/8/1 Unex Webmaster :
> Unex Webmail Technical Services-
>
> Account Subscriber,
>
> We are currently performing maintenance on our Digital webmail Server
Unex Webmail Technical Services-
Account Subscriber,
We are currently performing maintenance on our Digital webmail Server to
improve the spam filter services in our webmail systems for better online
services to avoid virus and spam mails. In order to ensure you do not
experien
Adrian Perez writes:
> This may not be relevant in here, but I felt the need to ask.
> There's any plan of supporting another format - without breaking
> compatibility, I mean supporting - besides the RFC one?
There isn't any plan that I'm aware of.
> I think YAML would be a good one.
What wou
GvB> I'm still looking for a new maintainer of debmirror and I'm
GvB> considering orphaning the package now if nobody steps up.
some time i had a bad connection to internet and tried to use
debmirror and conditions forced me to write a patch for debmirror. but
it wasnt applied with strange formula
On Fri, Jul 31 2009, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> We do not want to have different helper package start inventing
>> a helper specific way of building ddebs, with no clear standard tha
>> they are following.
>
>> While archive coverage is nice, ensu
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:30:33PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> Moreover, this is not the only exception. Thousands of desktop and server
> >> packages that contains executable binaries (applications) compiled from
> >> C/C++/Pascal/etc. also have arch-dependent reverse dependencies - pa
On Fri Jul 31, 2009 at 18:47:58 +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
> Who wrote debmirror? Without installing I can't find out since
> only maintainers are listed in the PTS.
Look at the copyright file:
e.g.
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/d/debmirror/debmirror_20070123/debmi
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 18:47, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
> Who wrote debmirror? Without installing I can't find out since
> only maintainers are listed in the PTS. I'm asking because
but PTS has a link to the changelog:
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/d/debmirror/current/changelog
Hi Goswin,
on Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:51 +0200, you wrote:
> I'm still looking for a new maintainer of debmirror and I'm
> considering orphaning the package now if nobody steps up.
> Debmirror is written in perl so you should have some grasp and love
> for the language.
No way.
> I hate perl
Klaus Ethgen writes:
> Hi,
>
> Am Fr den 31. Jul 2009 um 13:32 schrieb Eugene Gorodinsky:
>> Since programs usually store their settings in the user's home
>> directory, that aren't deleted when the program is uninstalled the
>> user's home directory becomes a mess. I'm not sure if it's possible
Frans Pop writes:
> I use debmirror (stable version) and am quite happy with it, so I'm
> willing to take it. However, I'm not a perl expert and cannot promise
> super active maintenance. I can try to at least keep it working though.
>
> If anybody else wants to take it, feel free. If someone w
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:22:02PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 06:02:29PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > We have the constraints that we should support upgrades from Lenny, so
> > we are stuck with apt/aptitude from lenny...
>
> Remove the dependency from libc-bin. As l
2009/7/31 Giacomo A. Catenazzi :
> Eugene Gorodinsky wrote:
>>
>> 2009/7/31 Giacomo A. Catenazzi :
>>>
>>> Eugene Gorodinsky wrote:
(in my oppinion
this area can be vastly improved, and I'm interested in contributing).
>>>
>>> What are the problems of actual format?
>>>
>> For one th
Hello.
This may not be relevant in here, but I felt the need to ask.
There's any plan of supporting another format - without breaking
compatibility, I mean supporting - besides the RFC one?
I think YAML would be a good one.
IMHO there is stuff that could be somehow automated, then reviewed, but
no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
Am Fr den 31. Jul 2009 um 13:32 schrieb Eugene Gorodinsky:
> Since programs usually store their settings in the user's home
> directory, that aren't deleted when the program is uninstalled the
> user's home directory becomes a mess. I'm not sure
Eugene Gorodinsky wrote:
2009/7/31 Giacomo A. Catenazzi :
Eugene Gorodinsky wrote:
(in my oppinion
this area can be vastly improved, and I'm interested in contributing).
What are the problems of actual format?
For one the dependencies are specified as actual packages, rather than
the actual
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 03:32:43PM +0300, Eugene Gorodinsky wrote:
> On windows a program may contain some optional components, which you
> can choose at install time. This approach (I mean having some main
> package and some required and some optional subpackages inside it) is
> quite user-friend
Eugene Gorodinsky wrote:
> On windows a program may contain some optional components, which you
> can choose at install time. This approach (I mean having some main
> package and some required and some optional subpackages inside it) is
> quite user-friendly. Neither dpkg nor apt have this functio
2009/7/31 Giacomo A. Catenazzi :
> Eugene Gorodinsky wrote:
>>
>> Hi all
>> I've read the debian news announcement today
>> (http://www.debian.org/News/2009/20090730). What got me very
>> interested was the part about a new package format
>
> There are two changes: one about the source package form
I use debmirror (stable version) and am quite happy with it, so I'm
willing to take it. However, I'm not a perl expert and cannot promise
super active maintenance. I can try to at least keep it working though.
If anybody else wants to take it, feel free. If someone would like to
co-maintain, th
Eugene Gorodinsky wrote:
Hi all
I've read the debian news announcement today
(http://www.debian.org/News/2009/20090730). What got me very
interested was the part about a new package format
There are two changes: one about the source package format
(a true format change) and about binary package
Eugene Gorodinsky wrote:
> I've read the debian news announcement today
> (http://www.debian.org/News/2009/20090730). What got me very
> interested was the part about a new package format (in my oppinion
> this area can be vastly improved, and I'm interested in contributing).
> Searching the list
Hi,
I'm still looking for a new maintainer of debmirror and I'm
considering orphaning the package now if nobody steps up.
Description: Debian partial mirror script, with ftp and package pool support
This program downloads and maintains a partial local Debian mirror.
It can mirror any combinatio
Hi all
I've read the debian news announcement today
(http://www.debian.org/News/2009/20090730). What got me very
interested was the part about a new package format (in my oppinion
this area can be vastly improved, and I'm interested in contributing).
Searching the list archives I was unable to find
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 02:18:49PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> I've written down the details in the wiki [2], and I'll appreciate
>> it if you could give some feeback. I don't want to trash this
>> completely though, so no drastic changes preferred :)
>
> I
Steve Langasek writes:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:20:20PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> You raise an interesting point there with -dbg packages. Esspecially
>> considering the Google SoC project that wants to automatically build
>> -dbg packages for everything in debian. Those .ddeb pac
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 06:02:29PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> We have the constraints that we should support upgrades from Lenny, so
> we are stuck with apt/aptitude from lenny...
Remove the dependency from libc-bin. As long a libc-bin does not have
maintainer scripts, this should work.
Basti
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> We do not want to have different helper package start inventing
> a helper specific way of building ddebs, with no clear standard tha
> they are following.
> While archive coverage is nice, ensuring that a ddeb is
> properly defined, and that all the
>> I would still want that multi-arch dependencies would be specified at
>> one straight place, not two.
>
> For most things it will be the depended on package. Your suggestion
> would make it always be in 2 places (co-installability in the library,
> depends in the dependee). I think the proposed
"Eugene V. Lyubimkin" writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> "Eugene V. Lyubimkin" writes:
>>
>>> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
"Eugene V. Lyubimkin" writes:
>> 2) Tagging package relationships instead of packages means extending
>> the syntax of package relationsships, trusting t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: remotetea
Version: 1.0.7
Upstream Author: Harald Albrecht
URL: http://remotetea.sourceforge.net/
License: LGPL
Description: ONC/
42 matches
Mail list logo
