On Sun, 24 May 2009, Bastian Blank wrote:
> This means that Debian will get uninstallable on the following CPUs:
> - Intel i486,
There is new hardware sold today that is (only) compatible to the 486 SX
instruction set. But it runs at 300 MHz. So it would be a pity to loose
support for such hardwar
On Sun, 24 May 2009 22:31:06 +0200
Peter De Wachter wrote:
> I've set up a search engine which indexes Debian's source code:
>
> http://walrus.rave.org/source/
>
> Currently, unstable main and contrib are indexed, in total 70 gigabytes
> of source.
I'm coming up with "nothing found" for sym
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 03:36:28AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 22:31 +0200, Peter De Wachter wrote:
>> I've set up a search engine which indexes Debian's source code:
>> http://walrus.rave.org/source/
> Cool - that looks really useful. However, it looks like you're jus
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 4:31 AM, Peter De Wachter wrote:
> The software used is OpenGrok, originally developed at
> Sun for OpenSolaris (http://opensolaris.org/os/project/opengrok). It's
> quite nice, although a bit slow with this amount of source code.
Anyone know if there is or will be a fosso
PT
Centeas de eBooks completos e gratuitos, não requer cadastro.
Livros de Java, .NET, entre outros.
Acesse: http://www.ebook-here.com
EN
Hundreds of eBooks full and free, requires no registration.
Books for Java,. NET, among others.
Link: http://www.ebook-here.com
On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 22:31 +0200, Peter De Wachter wrote:
> I've set up a search engine which indexes Debian's source code:
>
> http://walrus.rave.org/source/
>
> Currently, unstable main and contrib are indexed, in total 70 gigabytes
> of source. (It would probably be nice to have stable and
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Edi Stojicevic
* Package name: libweb-scraper-perl
Version : 0.28
Upstream Author : Tastuhiko Miyagawa
* URL :
http://search.cpan.org/dist/Web-Scraper-0.28/lib/Web/Scraper.pm
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Perl
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Edi Stojicevic
* Package name: libnet-twitter-diff-perl
Version : 0.04
Upstream Author : Tomohiro Teranishi
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-Twitter-Diff-0.04/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Perl
Descripti
Hello Bastian,
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> I would like to raise the minimum CPU requirement for the shipped Linux
> kernels in the i386 port to i686 (with cmov). For now I will not propose
> a change of the default machine type setting used by the compile
On 2009-05-24, Bastian Blank wrote:
> I would like to raise the minimum CPU requirement for the shipped Linux
> kernels in the i386 port to i686 (with cmov). For now I will not propose
> a change of the default machine type setting used by the compiler.
IMHO you got to explain why you want to mak
I've set up a search engine which indexes Debian's source code:
http://walrus.rave.org/source/
Currently, unstable main and contrib are indexed, in total 70 gigabytes
of source. (It would probably be nice to have stable and testing as
well, but I don't have enough disk space available. I skippe
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Samuel Thibault
* Package name: natbraille
Version : 1-5
Upstream Author : Bruno Mascret , Frédéric Schwebel,
Vivien Guillet
* URL : http://natbraille.free.fr/
* License : GPL2
Programming Lang: Jav
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Richard Jones
* Package name: libguestfs
Version : 1.0.31
Upstream Author : Richard W.M. Jones
* URL : http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/libguestfs/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C, Shell script, various others
Desc
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Richard Jones
* Package name: febootstrap
Version : 2.1
Upstream Author : Richard W.M. Jones
* URL : http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/febootstrap/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Shell script
Description : a tool
On Sun, 24 May 2009, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On May 23, "Steve M. Robbins" wrote:
> > I'm open to other options, of course. What is the recommended
> > practice for this scenario?
>
> Implement spam filtering?
I think adding the lists.debian.org and bugs.debian.org ruleset[1] to
packages.debian.or
I demand that Bastian Blank may or may not have written...
> I would like to raise the minimum CPU requirement for the shipped Linux
> kernels in the i386 port to i686 (with cmov). For now I will not propose a
> change of the default machine type setting used by the compiler.
WRT squeeze, pre- or
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 09:07:49PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> I would like to raise the minimum CPU requirement for the shipped Linux
> kernels in the i386 port to i686 (with cmov). For now I will not propose
> a change of the default machine type setting used by the compiler.
>
>
Hi folks
I would like to raise the minimum CPU requirement for the shipped Linux
kernels in the i386 port to i686 (with cmov). For now I will not propose
a change of the default machine type setting used by the compiler.
This means that Debian will get uninstallable on the following CPUs:
- Intel
Hi folks
I would like to raise the minimum CPU requirement for the s390 port to
z900. At the same time the 31-bit kernel (-s390) will be retired because
it lacks upstream maintenance.
This means that Debian will get unusable on the old 31-bit-only CPUs (G5
and G6), as used for example in the Mult
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:30:03PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> So I've looked through a few weeks of mail logs to packages.debian.org,
> and it looks like it collects some useful mail from automated scripts
> on various debian.org machines (primarily ries), and about 1000 spams a
>
Mathieu Malaterre writes:
> the only suspicious thing I can think of is that there is a mismatch
> for my email adress. For some reason the email listed on
> http://ftp-master.debian.org/dm-uploaders.html is:
> ma...@users.sourceforge.net, while everything else was done using
> mathieu.malate...@
Hello,
I am a new debian maintainer, and for the first time I tried a
debian package upload. It did not go that well as I received the
following email (*). The package is gdcm, it is collab maintain at
debian-med, the only suspicious thing I can think of is that there is
a mismatch for my email
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:30:03PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> So I've looked through a few weeks of mail logs to packages.debian.org,
> and it looks like it collects some useful mail from automated scripts
> on various debian.org machines (primarily ries), and about 1000 spams a
>
On May 23, "Steve M. Robbins" wrote:
> I'm open to other options, of course. What is the recommended
> practice for this scenario?
Implement spam filtering?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Olivier,
thanks for stepping up and working on this (also for your work on
mantis -- will come back to this seperated).
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:08:59AM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
> Le lundi 18 mai 2009 à 07:42 +0100, Neil Williams a écrit :
> > On Sun, 17 May 2009 23:18:40 +0100
>
> > >
25 matches
Mail list logo
