Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
> It's mainly (slightly) confusing on the debian-boot list. At least I have
> occasionally had to look twice before remembering that those mails are
> about the archive and not D-I. I agree it wasn't a huge issue.
Confirmed. I had the same issue from time
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniel Moerner
* Package name: pekwm-themes
Version : 1.0.5
Upstream Author : Adriano Foschi
* URL : http://adrinux.wordpress.com/pekwm-themes
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: N/A
Description : Themes for the pe
I use b...@packages.debian.org to contact the maintainer of "blah". I
use this to alert maintainers of reverse build-deps when I do
something drastic to one of the libraries I maintain.
I'm open to other options, of course. What is the recommended
practice for this scenario?
Thanks,
-Steve
si
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi,
pyro, a distributed object system for Python, doesn't have a real maintainer
at the moment. While we try to keep it in shape within the Python Modules
Team, there is nobody of us using the package (anymore). If there is anybody
using pyro, help with maintaining
Jörg Jaspert wrote:
> Frans Pop (Thu, 21 May 2009 20:54:22 +0200):
>> > From: Debian Installer
>>
>> Although this usage probably predates D-I, I do find it quite confusing
>> in practice, and for example when googling, that we currently have two
>> completely unrelated usages of the term "Debian
On 11759 March 1977, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> + Frans Pop (Thu, 21 May 2009 20:54:22 +0200):
>> > From: Debian Installer
>> Although this usage probably predates D-I, I do find it quite confusing in
>> practice, and for example when googling, that we currently have two
>> completely unrelated usa
Stephen Gran wrote:
> day from elsewhere. I haven't done an exhaustive survey, but it seems
> pretty clear so far that the domain does not get any significant amount
> of legitimate mail from machines other than the debian.org hosts.
>
> If this is actually the case, I'd like to close the domain
+ Frans Pop (Thu, 21 May 2009 20:54:22 +0200):
> Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > From: Debian Installer
> Although this usage probably predates D-I, I do find it quite confusing in
> practice, and for example when googling, that we currently have two
> completely unrelated usages of the term "Debian
Hi Moritz
ledcontrol was uploaded a few days ago and contain no more gtk1.2 bindings.
Please do not remove that one.
Best regards,
// Ola
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 10:12:04PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> As requested by the release managers here's the announcement that
> the remaining packa
On Sat, 23 May 2009 15:56:05 +0200
Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Ben Armstrong, le Sat 23 May 2009 10:38:51 -0300, a écrit :
> > Accessibility
> >
> > we understand that some users also need software synthesized
> >text-to-speech, something for which there is no support yet in the
> >stand
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sven Hoexter
* Package name: elyxer
Version : 0.22
Upstream Author : Alex Fernández
* URL : http://www.nongnu.org/elyxer/
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Standalone LyX to HTML converter
Hello,
Ben Armstrong, le Sat 23 May 2009 10:38:51 -0300, a écrit :
> Accessibility
>
> we understand that some users also need software synthesized
>text-to-speech, something for which there is no support yet in the
>standard Debian-installer. We understand this isn't an easy thing
>
Yes, it was already packaged, but i fixed it to make it full lintian
compliant: licence reference was missing.
I asked the developer to patch the upstream, he will apply the suggested
fixes within this weekend
Also I suspect build-depends list is overcrowded, but it passed the
pbuilder packaging
Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
>
> According to SVG specifications[1] and freedesktop's mime database[2],
> the compressed .svg files should be named *.svgz (not .svg.gz)
BTW, compressed PDF (.pdf.gz) are perfectly handled by mime, nautilus and
evince (file association works perfectly, thumbnails are displ
Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Jonathan Wiltshire said:
>> The debian-l10n-english team, and perhaps others, use this domain to
>> keep the maintainer in the loop during Smith English-language reviews
>> and the subsequent translations.
>
> This one time, at band camp, Adeodato
Package: debhelper
Version: 7.2.8
Severity: normal
Hello,
According to SVG specifications[1] and freedesktop's mime database[2],
the compressed .svg files should be named *.svgz (not .svg.gz)
Files that are named *.svg.gz are identified as application/x-gzip
instead of image/svg+xml-compressed.
Package: wnpp
Owner: Ryan Niebur
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libcapture-tiny-perl
Version : 0.06
Upstream Author : David Golden
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Capture-Tiny/
* License : Apache-2.0
Progra
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 12:58:32PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> > Bill Allombert wrote:
> >> I use packages.debian.org each time I reassign a bug to a package to make
> >> sure the new maintainer is notified. I think this should be a best
> >> practice.
> > BTS auto
Steve Langasek wrote:
> > While I do prefer sendmail, I think there is one technical
> > issue you guys are glossing over: The fact that we have an installed
> > base of Exim, and documentation all over the place that assumes the
> > Debian default is Exim,
>
> Such as? I haven't seen any
Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> Bill Allombert wrote:
>> I use packages.debian.org each time I reassign a bug to a package to make
>> sure the new maintainer is notified. I think this should be a best
>> practice.
> BTS automatically adds maintainers of package where bug went to To/CC of
> reassign m
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alastair McKinstry
* Package name: hdf-eos
Version : 2.15v1.00
Upstream Author : Hughes and Applied Research Corporation
* URL : http://hdfeos.org/software.php
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : E
Stephen Gran wrote:
> It sounds like the service should probably stay open. I would have been
> happy to restrict something that is only a spam attractor, but if it's
> more than that, than I'm happy people find it a useful service. If the
> teams who do use it think it can still be useful and b
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 5:59 PM, LI Daobing wrote:
> sounds many f...@debian.org mail address is out of working (including mine).
Same here, however it looks like it is fixed now (at least for p...@debian.org).
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
On Sat, 23 May 2009 17:59:17 +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
> Hello,
>
> sounds many f...@debian.org mail address is out of working (including mine).
>
> [..]
As said on IRC:
11:33 effective spam filtering
LOL
--
. ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
: :' : Linuxer #
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 12:46:08PM +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> Bill Allombert wrote:
> > I use packages.debian.org each time I reassign a bug to a package to make
> > sure the new maintainer is notified. I think this should be a best
> > practice.
> BTS automatically adds maintainers of pac
On Saturday 23 May 2009, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
> What about requiring a GPG signed email by key in developers or
> maintainers keyring?
As others have already mentioned, the addresses are also intended as
contact point for upstream developers and users, i.e. people who don't
have such a key
Hello,
sounds many f...@debian.org mail address is out of working (including mine).
any one know what happened?
one reject email:
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
lidaob...@debian.org
Technical details
Bill Allombert wrote:
> I use packages.debian.org each time I reassign a bug to a package to make
> sure the new maintainer is notified. I think this should be a best
> practice.
BTS automatically adds maintainers of package where bug went to To/CC of
reassign mail, doesn't it?
--
Eugene V. Lyubi
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:30:03PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> So I've looked through a few weeks of mail logs to packages.debian.org,
> and it looks like it collects some useful mail from automated scripts
> on various debian.org machines (primarily ries), and about 1000 spams a
>
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:30:03PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> If this is actually the case, I'd like to close the domain down to only
> accept mail from other debian.org machines. If it's not, I'd like to work
> with people who do use it to either make it possible to send their mail
> from debia
On Fri 22 May 2009, Stephen Gran wrote:
>
> So I've looked through a few weeks of mail logs to packages.debian.org,
> and it looks like it collects some useful mail from automated scripts
> on various debian.org machines (primarily ries), and about 1000 spams a
> day from elsewhere. I haven't don
31 matches
Mail list logo
