Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I saw my qa page, and found watch file error, but that is in my box,
First of all, reporting it to debian-qa would have been better; although if
you take a look at dehs.alioth.debian.org you will find the right contact
address.
Second: please provide a link to th
Hi,
I saw my qa page, and found watch file error, but that is in my box,
> henr...@babytalk:~/working/po-debconf/vsftpd$ cd
> /home/henrich/src/ttf-fonts/ttf-misaki-11-20080603/
> henr...@babytalk:~/src/ttf-fonts/ttf-misaki-11-20080603$ uscan --verbose
> -- Scanning for watchfiles in .
> -- Fou
Guillem Jover wrote:
> I'd rather work during this release cycle
> on improving the general conffile support.
>
What about modifying the format of conffiles to allow:
[ ]
Which would let dpkg know that it should look for and rename
it to (usual change-detection should apply); if it doesn't ex
On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 11:00:54AM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> I maintain a lot of systems that run on CompactFlash cards of a few GB, but
> also have 1 or 2 GB of RAM. I mount a tmpfs over /var/cache/apt/archives, so I
> can upgrade the system without using a large amount of space on flash, and t
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 3:32 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Florian Lohoff writes:
>> On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 11:40:57PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Interesting - The unix way IMHO was that /tmp looses content on reboot
>> while /var/tmp did not. This had been the case for commercial Unices for
>> a
Noah Slater wrote:
>
> What about uscan being able to use custom make targets in debian/rules?
[...]
No, #458789
Cheers,
Raphael Geissert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 11:50:45PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Cyril Brulebois writes:
>
> > Vincent Fourmond (01/04/2009):
> >> Although I admit that schroot is a neat tool to deal with that, it is
> >> overkill in the case of wine, and much too complex for users that would
> >> be i
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Paleino
* Package name: bist
Version : 0.5.1
Upstream Author : Valerio Benfante
* URL : https://gna.org/projects/bist/
http://www.autistici.org/interzona/repos_bist/
* License : GPL
Programmin
Le samedi 04 avril 2009 à 22:23 +1000, Kel Modderman a écrit :
> An interface for disabling/enabling system boot scripts has been proposed
> and committed [1] and also made available for dependency based boot [2].
>
> These changes may need to be discussed further now though, as Steve Langasek
> s
Il giorno sab, 28/03/2009 alle 22.39 +0900, Paul Wise ha scritto:
> 2009/3/28 Stefano Canepa :
>
> > Where is a the right place to copy the mirror list?
>
> Perhaps a static copy in /usr/share/apt-spy and the dynamically
> downloaded version at /var/cache/apt-spy/ ?
At the end I decided to use o
On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 01:35:17PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> opts=handler=svn http://domain.tld/svn/foo/...
>
> would do the right thing.
What about uscan being able to use custom make targets in debian/rules?
There could be a way to tell uscan to use the following:
debian/rules get-ori
Ben Finney wrote:
> Raphael Geissert writes:
[...]
>> How does bzr recognise whether it should use http or not?
>
> I don't understand the question. I'll try to answer what might be the
> question; if this doesn't answer you, please re-phrase.
>
> Bazaar can use HTTP as a transport for file-lev
Florian Lohoff writes:
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 11:40:57PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> one of the changes in 3.8.1 was, that support for tmpfs on /var/run
>> (and /var/tmp) became mandatory [9.3.2]. Lintian is now also
>> complaining very loudly (error) if your package ships a directory in
>>
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 11:40:57PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Subject: Why do we have to support tmpfs for /var/run (policy changes in
> 3.8.1)
>
> Hi,
>
> one of the changes in 3.8.1 was, that support for tmpfs on /var/run (and
> /var/tmp) became mandatory [9.3.2]. Lintian is now also c
Ben Finney wrote:
> Raphael Geissert writes:
>
>
>> Ben Finney wrote:
>>
>>> * the fact that the URL doesn't necessarily indicate what VCS tool is
>>> needed to interact with it (just about all of them allow an HTTP URL
>>> for public read-only access, so that's what will commonly be u
Hi,
On Saturday 04 April 2009, Kel Modderman wrote:
> On Thursday 19 March 2009 00:35:06 Jan Wagner wrote:
> > while thinking about how to solve #508189, where I need to change the
> > position of the initscript in bootorder, I thought it would not
> > sufficient to change only the call of dh_inst
Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>
>>> One additional thought: We store packaging Vcs and upstream homepage
>>> in debian/control. What about storing upstream Vcs there as well and
>>> teach uscan to look there as well. Just a rough thought.
>>
>> And do what w
Paul Wise writes:
> On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
>> Afaik, Ubuntu is the only Linux distro which supports and uses tmpfs by
>> default.
>
> The OpenEmbedded distros do this too, I've especially seen that the
> ones associated with OpenMoko do that.
Maemo does it, too.
Mais detalhes em:
http://www.maladiretaemails.com
mala direta por email mala direta emails listas de e-mails cadastros mala
direta, mais emails divulgação de sites, cadastro de sites fazer mala direta,
envio de mala direta Listas segmentadas e programa para enviar e-mail opt in,
mala direta ele
On Sat, 2009-04-04 at 11:00 +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> The problem is that some programs (apt-get, PolicyKit, etc.) store temporary
> files in /var/run or /var/cache in their own subdirectories, but expect
> something else to create these directories for them. I think we should require
> these pr
On Saturday 04 April 2009 19:00:54 Guus Sliepen wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 01:54:07AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
> > > contact a running daemon. Could you explain what policykit uses /var/run
> > > for, and educate me a bit on why D-Bus services have to put things in
> > > /var/run but d
On Thursday 02 April 2009 01:03:27 Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> currently we seem to have no clear policy in Debian how to handle
> the question: "Shall a service started once its installed or not?"
> The current state of affairs is that some packages start after beeing
> installed, some do
On Thursday 19 March 2009 00:35:06 Jan Wagner wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> while thinking about how to solve #508189, where I need to change the
> position
> of the initscript in bootorder, I thought it would not sufficient to change
> only the call of dh_installinit in the rules file.
>
> If an use
On 04/04/09 01:22, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 01:14:51AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> I provided a list of cons of tmpfs (you could probably also add, that it
>> breaks selinux). Is there actually a list of pros?
>
> "Probably"? In what case does this break selinux?
It doe
On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 22:11 +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 08:33:55PM +0200, Omer Zak wrote:
> > My wish is that modularization of Debian packages be improved. It means
> > that it'll be possible to uninstall all games in a PC and continue to
> > have functioning KDE. Likewi
Hello,
Brett Parker writes:
> I thought they all now dynamically linked against xulrunner so that security
> support was much simpler than before, so it's really just a frontend more than
> a clone of firefox, no?
Yes, I think Iceweasel and Icecat can share xulrunner without problems.
After th
On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 01:54:07AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > contact a running daemon. Could you explain what policykit uses /var/run
> > for, and educate me a bit on why D-Bus services have to put things in
> > /var/run but don't have init scripts?
>
> PolicyKit stores credentials in /var
27 matches
Mail list logo
