On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 03:42:39PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> But as this would hardcode exim4 as the default MTA for Debian in a number
> of packages, some better solutions have been proposed in
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/05/msg00381.html with the best
> choice appearantly be
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 397 (new: 3)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 113 (new: 2)
Total number of packages request
On Fri Feb 27 02:00, Enrico Zini wrote:
> Putting java libraries into 'java' instead of 'libs' would just make
> it harder for a package manager to hide libraries. Debtags will work
> for that, so no big deal, but at the moment 'libs' is nice because it
> allows me to auto-tag packages from th
On Fri Feb 27 02:10, Darren Salt wrote:
> > I'd prefer "localization".
>
> Whereas I'd prefer "localisation"...
>
> > - We use en_US in general -> "ize"
>
> ... unless you're localising for en_US. OTOH, given that that section is for
> localisation, "localization" is probably right, being locali
Hi ,
You have been invited by John penmark (johnpenmark) to join YouBundle. You can
follow the link below to join - you will automatically join johnpenmark's fan
list, and you will also become a fan of johnpenmark and be able to follow their
bundling progress!
Click to register:
http://www.y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26-02-2009 23:10, Darren Salt wrote:
> I demand that Frans Pop may or may not have written...
>> Joerg Jaspert wrote:
[...]
>>> The new sections are:
>>> localisationsLanguage packs
>> I'd prefer "localization".
> Whereas I'd prefer "l
> "Sam" == Sam Hartman writes:
Sam> OK, so I think we're all set. The plan now is to
Sam> 1) Build twice, once into build and once into build-krb4. We
Sam> only pull libkrb4.so out of build-krb4. 2)
This works at least.
Sam> 3) Make libkrb53 depend on all the libraries
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Yaroslav Halchenko
* Package name: openmeeg
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : OpenMEEG Team
* URL : http://www-sop.inria.fr/odyssee/software/OpenMEEG/
* License : CeCILL-B
Programming Lang: C++
Description : lib
Daniel Moerner writes:
> chicken-bin
Ah, yes, I meant to list that but forgot; good catch.
> mzscheme and drscheme are just plt-scheme transitional packages by now
True; in that case, perhaps they should go to oldlibs until they
retire altogether.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.ed
I demand that Joerg Jaspert may or may not have written...
[snip]
> The initial set of packages moved into the new sections will be found
> using the following matches:
[snip]
> video
[snip]
> *xine*
Slightly over-broad, unless you want to move library packages too (but I see
that
I demand that Frans Pop may or may not have written...
> Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>> We plan on changing the current sections in the archive. With the rapid
>> growth of archive, many of them have become too big to be useful anymore.
> Great.
>> The new sections are:
> [...]
>> localisations
David Paleino writes:
> On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:36:07 +0100 (CET), Andreas Tille wrote:
>> and at the same time fix all packages that only have a menu but no
>> desktop file."
> This could easily be added as a lintian check, I believe.
FWIW, the reason why Lintian doesn't have such a check is be
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 09:07:35PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> While we acknowledge that something like debtags will make a better
> long-term solution, we do not think that it is ready yet to completly
> replace sections (e.g. because it isn't assured that all packages have
> tags). This is why
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Joerg Jaspert writes:
>
>> Its lisp. Not one special part of it, just lisp. So other dialects as
>> well, if someone gets me a list of packages (or matches) for it.
>
> As I mentioned directly to override-change before encountering this
> me
I demand that John Goerzen may or may not have written...
> Joerg Schilling wrote:
[snip]
>> The code that was taken by Debian for the fork WAS free but now it is no
>> longer because Debian did apply changes that are forbidden by law.
> When will you enumerate these?
What, and leave him without
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 02:13:48 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 26 février 2009 à 17:08 -0800, Kelly Clowers a écrit :
>> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 15:50, Josselin Mouette
>> wrote:
>> > Le jeudi 26 février 2009 à 21:07 +0100, Joerg Jaspert a écrit :
>> >> ruby Everything
Le jeudi 26 février 2009 à 17:08 -0800, Kelly Clowers a écrit :
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 15:50, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le jeudi 26 février 2009 à 21:07 +0100, Joerg Jaspert a écrit :
> >> ruby Everything about ruby, an interpreted object
> >> oriented
> >>
Joerg Jaspert writes:
> Its lisp. Not one special part of it, just lisp. So other dialects as
> well, if someone gets me a list of packages (or matches) for it.
One more: ikarus (which I initially overlooked because it's only
available on i386 :-/).
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.ed
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 15:50, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 26 février 2009 à 21:07 +0100, Joerg Jaspert a écrit :
>> ruby Everything about ruby, an interpreted object
>> oriented
>> language.
>> java Everything about Java
>
>
Joerg Jaspert writes:
> Its lisp. Not one special part of it, just lisp. So other dialects as
> well, if someone gets me a list of packages (or matches) for it.
As I mentioned directly to override-change before encountering this
message, I'd argue that my goo package is a (somewhat exotic)
candi
Le jeudi 26 février 2009 à 16:34 -0600, John Goerzen a écrit :
> So please do not tell us to adopt your source tree for main because a
> fork is illegal. The cognitive dissonance in that statement is amazing.
For someone who can invent contents of PGP-signed emails, inventing
legal breaches is li
How about:
webfeed - RSS/Atom feed readers, aggregator and utilities
akregator
blam
canto
cl-rss
claws-mail-feeds-reader
dcoprss
evolution-rss
feed2imap
firefox-sagefirefox-sage
kitty
liferea*
magpierss
miro*
newsbeuter
nrss
olive
php-xml-rss
planet
python-feedparser
python-feedvalidator
python-p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Tille wrote:
> This discussion comes up once or twice per year. In most cases it is
> triggered by users of freedesktop.org based environments. They fail to
> see the fact that there are other environments which do not support
> freedesktop.
El Jue 26 Feb 2009, Joerg Jaspert escribió:
> ruby Everything about ruby, an interpreted object oriented
> language.
> java Everything about Java
Have sense to inaugurate a section with all the R modules? Nowadays many of
them are i
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> John Goerzen wrote:
>
>> Joerg Schilling wrote:
>>
>>> The fork distributed by Debian may however be called dubious:
>>>
>>> - The fork is in conflict with the Copyright law and thus may not be
>>> legally distributed.
>> If your code was Free Software, then it is
Hi Jög,
On Donnerstag, 26. Februar 2009, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> As Lenny is finally released, and we are early in the cycle for squeeze,
> now is the best time to do some long-needed changes to our archive.
[...]
Cool, nice!
> The new sections are:
I think an r section would be useful, there ar
Le jeudi 26 février 2009 à 21:07 +0100, Joerg Jaspert a écrit :
> ruby Everything about ruby, an interpreted object oriented
> language.
> java Everything about Java
How about a "cli" section about everything related to Mono and the
I demand that John Goerzen may or may not have written...
[snip rebuttal of "fork is not legally distributable"]
> So please do not tell us to adopt your source tree for main because a
> fork is illegal. The cognitive dissonance in that statement is amazing.
I've just worked it out. He's an Elec
I demand that Brett Parker may or may not have written...
> On 26 Feb 15:47, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>> Brett Parker wrote:
>>> On 26 Feb 11:27, Joerg Schilling wrote:
- The fork is in conflict with the Copyright law and thus may not be
legally distributed.
>>> Err, it's a fork of t
John Goerzen wrote:
> Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> >
> > The fork distributed by Debian may however be called dubious:
> >
> > - The fork is in conflict with the Copyright law and thus may not be
> > legally distributed.
>
> If your code was Free Software, then it is perfectly legal for De
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:48:18PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > I don't if that warrants an "ocaml" section, which is your call, but
> > if it does, well, ... heads up :-)
>
> Get me a short description for it.
"Compiler, libraries, and tools for OCaml: a static typed ML language
implementatio
>> lisp Everything about Lisp
> Is this just about Common Lisp, or other Lisp dialects as well? I'm
> mainly referring to Scheme here, as it is another Lisp dialect in
> (relatively) widespread use (the third one being Emacs-Lisp).
Its lisp. Not one special part of it, just li
>> database Databases
> [...]
>> database
>> postgresql*
>> pg*
>> sqlite*
>> mysql*
>> libmysql*
>> db4.*
>> libdb4*
>> firebird*
>> sql-
On 11673 March 1977, Frans Pop wrote:
>> localisationsLanguage packs
> I'd prefer "localization".
> - We use en_US in general -> "ize"
Well, I dont really care. Fine, adjusted.
> - Having the section name plural seems inconsistent with other
> sections.
Dito.
>> video
> [...]
>>
Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> The fork distributed by Debian may however be called dubious:
>
> - The fork is in conflict with the Copyright law and thus may not be
> legally distributed.
If your code was Free Software, then it is perfectly legal for Debian to
do what it does.
If your
On 11673 March 1977, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Joerg Jaspert [Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:07:35 +0100]:
>
>> database
>> libmysql*
>> libdb4*
> I'm not sure these (and possibly *some* of the other lib* packages
> included in the listing) should be moved out of Section: libs.
Joerg Jaspert, le Thu 26 Feb 2009 21:07:35 +0100, a écrit :
> We plan on changing the current sections in the archive. With the rapid
> growth of archive, many of them have become too big to be useful anymore.
>
>[...]
>
> The new sections are:
>
> ruby Everything about ruby,
> Not like it is *that* important, but we now have more than 100
> OCaml-related source packages in the archive, most of which are
> libraries for OCaml development.
> I don't if that warrants an "ocaml" section, which is your call, but
> if it does, well, ... heads up :-)
Get me a short descrip
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 21:07 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> The new sections are:
[..]
> videoVideo viewers, editors, recording, streaming
What about renaming sound as audio? (if we introduce the video one, )
Since the (perl|python|ruby|...) sections should contains libraries,
m
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, dan wrote:
> > > search and other privacy concerns so that people can make rational
> > > decisions based on reality instead of sensationalism.
> >
> > Sensationalism like
> > http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/08/us_government_p.html
> > http://www.schneier.com/blog/a
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> lisp (no, not in brackets)
> cl-*
> *-lisp
> *-el
Two things:
First, if by Lisp you mean everything related to Lisp, then this
should probably also include scheme*, not just Common Li
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 09:07:35PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>> The new sections are:
>
> Not like it is *that* important, but we now have more than 100
> OCaml-related source packages in the archive, most of which are
> libraries for OCaml development.
>
> I don't i
Hi,
Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> java Everything about Java
{...}
> gcj*
*gcj, too probably.
> database
> postgresql*
> pg*
> sqlite*
> mysql*
> libmysql*
That also hits database libs.
Joerg Jaspert writes:
> The new sections are:
[...]
> lisp Everything about Lisp
[...]
>
Is this just about Common Lisp, or other Lisp dialects as well? I'm
mainly referring to Scheme here, as it is another Lisp dialect in
(relatively) widespread use (the third one being Emacs
Hi
Dne Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:07:35 +0100
Joerg Jaspert napsal(a):
> database Databases
[...]
> database
> postgresql*
> pg*
> sqlite*
> mysql*
> libmysql*
> db4.*
> libdb
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 09:07:35PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> The new sections are:
Not like it is *that* important, but we now have more than 100
OCaml-related source packages in the archive, most of which are
libraries for OCaml development.
I don't if that warrants an "ocaml" section, which
Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> We plan on changing the current sections in the archive. With the rapid
> growth of archive, many of them have become too big to be useful
> anymore.
Great.
> The new sections are:
[...]
> localisationsLanguage packs
I'd prefer "localization".
- We use en_US
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 07:07:30PM +0100, sean finney wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 09:14:23AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > Well, it depends on how dpkg currently handles merges. My impression
> > (as a user, never looked at the actual code) is that it not even tries
> > to merge, it sim
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 12:56:30PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > BTW, I have a set of patches you might want to consider. I'll file
> > them in BTS if you're currently making make-kpkg.
>
> Please. I have been thinking about the request you made for
> debugging symbols being package
* Joerg Jaspert [Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:07:35 +0100]:
> database
> libmysql*
> libdb4*
I'm not sure these (and possibly *some* of the other lib* packages
included in the listing) should be moved out of Section: libs. I can see
how having a database section to browse c
Hello world,
As Lenny is finally released, and we are early in the cycle for squeeze,
now is the best time to do some long-needed changes to our archive.
Much of what we are currently doing is not visible to you as a user of
this archive, but the action we talk about now is:
We plan on changing t
On Thursday 26 February 2009 08:08:50 Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 02:31:24PM -0500, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
> > Further, we're definitely going to be giving people invitation
> > letters and other advice to make sure they present themselves in
> > the best (accurate) light they can
[WARNING: THIS MESSAGE IS PGP/MIME SIGNED, DON'T BLAME MY MUA ;)]
The only thing I remember is an ancient (2006) discussion on heise online (and
probably elsewhere too) [0] (German only, sorry) about this topic and all this
has been brought forward and not backed up by any proofs. Back then the la
hiya zack,
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 09:14:23AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Well, it depends on how dpkg currently handles merges. My impression
> (as a user, never looked at the actual code) is that it not even tries
> to merge, it simply discovers that the local file is not pristine and
> t
Le jeudi 26 février 2009 à 17:59 +0100, Joerg Schilling a écrit :
> > The email you are replying to declares:
> >
> > Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
> > protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-QLLn2OxCNRVAvKDPZ8Na"
> > [snip]
> > --=-QLLn2OxCNRVAvKDPZ8Na
> > Content-Typ
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Please don???t forward private replies to a public mailing list: this is
> very rude behavior.
Well, this is an open discussion and I see no reason not to share your rude
replies with others.
> Le jeudi 26 février 2009 à 17:08 +0100, Joerg Schilling a écrit :
> >
On 26 Feb 15:47, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Brett Parker wrote:
>
> > On 26 Feb 11:27, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > > - The fork is in conflict with the Copyright law and thus may not be
> > > legally distributed.
> >
> > Err, it's a fork of the GPL2 code, before you went insane and relicenced
> >
Please don’t forward private replies to a public mailing list: this is
very rude behavior.
Le jeudi 26 février 2009 à 17:08 +0100, Joerg Schilling a écrit :
> **
> If you are using a coding other than 7-Bit ASCII or ISO-8859-1, you need to
> properly declare your transfer encoding. Pl
**
If you are using a coding other than 7-Bit ASCII or ISO-8859-1, you need to
properly declare your transfer encoding. Please fix your mail client!
**
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 26 février 2009 à 13:55 +0100, Joerg Schilling a écrit :
> > Josselin Mouette wrote
Harald Braumann writes:
>> I fail to see the differences (no pun intented) between "the last
>> version I've merged" and the current file ...
>
> I mean the last maintainer version I merged into the installed version,
> not the result of the last merge.
ok
> But there are 3 possible situations
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> Russ Allbery wrote:
>>
>> Luke L writes:
>>
>>> Something to think about: Shouldn't SQL databases and web servers, and
>>> file servers, be under /srv/? /srv/www, /srv/mysql, /srv/smb, etc.?
>>
>> The current FHS reserves /srv's name
Russ Allbery wrote:
Luke L writes:
Something to think about: Shouldn't SQL databases and web servers, and
file servers, be under /srv/? /srv/www, /srv/mysql, /srv/smb, etc.?
The current FHS reserves /srv's namespace for the local administrator. My
guess is that people won't want to go back
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 01:25:33PM +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> > Also, there is of course no guaranteed that no conflicting changes
> > lead to a configuration file semantically sound,
> That's the main problem I see with VCS like merge. The main problem is
> that the merge result *should* be
reassign 482921 glibc
thanks
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 482921 glibc
Bug#482921: please provide libc6-hppa64 and libc6-hppa64-dev packages
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `glibc'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syste
Brett Parker wrote:
> On 26 Feb 11:27, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > - The fork is in conflict with the Copyright law and thus may not be
> > legally distributed.
>
> Err, it's a fork of the GPL2 code, before you went insane and relicenced
> half of it to CDDL and added random "Don't change t
FYI:
Although people from many countries (Japan, Europe, ...) are not
required to have visa, US now requires to fill some web form in advance.
PLEASE do not forget to do Travel Authorization:
https://esta.cbp.dhs.gov/
Also ...
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 09:08:50AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On W
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:13:31 +, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Thu Feb 26 12:57, David Paleino wrote:
> > > You will never manage to "force" upstream authors of different
> > > environments to support freedesktop.org standard because you have no
> > > handle to force anybody in Free Software.
> >
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 508644 Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess
Bug#508644: general: installing mdadm pulls in citadel-server as depedency
Changed Bug title to `Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess' from `general:
installing mdadm pulls in citadel-server a
retitle 508644 Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess
thanks
Hi,
I'd like to close/reassign this bug... :-)
A better description of what this bug is about can actually be read in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=474999 and the solution
would be to file bugs against those 8 packa
I demand that José Luis Redrejo Rodríguez may or may not have written...
[snip]
> I don't think removing Debian menu is a good idea, as many people are still
> using it, but when you're using a freedesktop.org environment, this menu is
> really ugly, useless and duplicating entries.
There are som
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 512401 metacity
Bug#512401: general: Java, Tk and Tkinter applications broken in Metacity
window manager
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `metacity'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Your message dated Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:22:32 +0100
with message-id <200902261522.38235.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line wontfix
has caused the Debian Bug report #172318,
regarding apt: Automatic appends to sources.list via webpages.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva"
* Package name: libghc6-extensible-exceptions
Version : 0.1.1.0
Upstream Author : Haskell Libraries Maintainers
* URL :
http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/extensible-except
Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le jeudi 26 février 2009 à 12:58 +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl a
écrit :
Please, not again. The arguments have been exchanged ad invinitum a couple
of times already. So if there is nothing new to bring up, please don't
restart the discussion.
Why? It’s quite funny t
Manoj Srivastava writes:
> /etc/kernel-pkg.conf, for example, is in Perl. You may define
> functions, variables, closures (given enough make-kpkg-fu) and have it
> all work.
Agreed. But this is valid for power user that would not really need
the safe merge capability provided by Config::Model
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:48:35AM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Agreed. If we can identify all libraries (perhaps with a simple grep over
> the lintian lab?) containing these types, and make sure LFS is enabled in
> all of them, it should then be possible to switch once all dependencies
> are rebu
Le jeudi 26 février 2009 à 12:58 +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl a
écrit :
> Please, not again. The arguments have been exchanged ad invinitum a couple
> of times already. So if there is nothing new to bring up, please don't
> restart the discussion.
Why? It’s quite funny to discuss with Joerg S
On Thu Feb 26 12:57, David Paleino wrote:
> > You will never manage to "force" upstream authors of different environments
> > to support freedesktop.org standard because you have no handle to force
> > anybody in Free Software.
>
> Sure you can't, but standards exist for this reason. And sane upst
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 08:31 +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> > HAL is just querying the group database directly. Any process can of
> > course do this. But it's asking a different question, namely:
> > what groups is this user a member of in the group d
Manoj Srivastava writes:
> Well. If the maintainer so desires, ucf does have this to say:
> ,[ Manual page ucf(1) ]
> | --three-way
[ ... ]
> Seems like this is what is desired; however, the reason this is
> not on by default is that some configuration files can be huge, an
On 26 Feb 11:27, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> - The fork is in conflict with the Copyright law and thus may not be
> legally distributed.
Err, it's a fork of the GPL2 code, before you went insane and relicenced
half of it to CDDL and added random "Don't change this" invariant
sections - how
Stefano Zacchiroli writes:
> Well, it depends on how dpkg currently handles merges. My impression
> (as a user, never looked at the actual code) is that it not even tries
> to merge, it simply discovers that the local file is not pristine and
> then asks the user. On the contrary, every VCS I'm aw
Le Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:02:29PM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Sune Vuorela wrote:
>
>> I am considering starting a discussion within the KDE team to stop
>> supporting the Debian Menu.
>>
>> It becomes more and more useless - and it is also very ugly, as the menu
>> itsel
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:36:07 +0100 (CET), Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, David Paleino wrote:
>
> > What about making all environments out there support the freedesktop.org
> > standard instead?
>
> The situation is different. It is not that all environments support
> Debian menu b
Hi!
Ben Hutchings schrieb:
> On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 09:28 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>>> [..] cdrecord [..]
>>> [..] wodim [..]
Please, not again. The arguments have been exchanged ad invinitum a couple
of times already. So if there is nothing new to bring up, please don't
restart the discussi
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, David Paleino wrote:
What about making all environments out there support the freedesktop.org
standard instead?
The situation is different. It is not that all environments support
Debian menu but many of them invented their own menu system. The Debian
Menu system just pr
Le jeudi 26 février 2009 à 11:12 +, Tzafrir Cohen a écrit :
> The "Settings" top menu is now mostly unusable, as it is one long list that
> includes both KDE and GNOME settings.
And it will, as long as the KDE maintainers don’t fix their
broken .desktop entries to add the missing OnlyShowIn en
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Plessy
Hello everybody,
Here is another Perl library that is needed for the Generic Genome Browser
(version 2).
I will inject the package soon in the pkg-perl repository.
Have a nice day,
-- Charles Plessy
Source: libgd-svg-perl
Section: perl
P
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:12:25 +0100, José Luis Redrejo Rodríguez wrote:
> 2009/2/26 Andreas Tille
>
> > On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> >
> > I am considering starting a discussion within the KDE team to stop
> >> supporting the Debian Menu.
> >>
> >> It becomes more and more useless
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:14:34AM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2009-02-26, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> > --Sig_/b/o0j06x1Maj8m.BfPK65gn
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> >
> > Is that a violation of a must directive and therefore a b
2009/2/26 Andreas Tille
> On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Sune Vuorela wrote:
>
> I am considering starting a discussion within the KDE team to stop
>> supporting the Debian Menu.
>>
>> It becomes more and more useless - and it is also very ugly, as the menu
>> itself specifies icons that are nonexistant i
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Sune Vuorela wrote:
I am considering starting a discussion within the KDE team to stop
supporting the Debian Menu.
It becomes more and more useless - and it is also very ugly, as the menu
itself specifies icons that are nonexistant in all icon themes.
This discussion come
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 06:20:50PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 10:52:30PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> > Personally, I would prefer the glibc headers to just set the LFS
> > macros to the 64 bit versions by default, so that rather than
> > taking extra steps to enable L
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 09:28 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > >xcdroast is looking for cdrecord, which does no longer exist in Debian
> > >Sid (apparently). And wodim does no longer provide a symlink as cdrecord
> > >or something (apparently).
> >
> > >So: xcdroast does
On 2009-02-26, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> --Sig_/b/o0j06x1Maj8m.BfPK65gn
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> Is that a violation of a must directive and therefore a bug that will
> need fixing ASAP? AIUI packages that have a GUI are requir
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> Is that a violation of a must directive and therefore a bug that will
> need fixing ASAP? AIUI packages that have a GUI are required to have
> debian menu, but I'm not sure if the window manager / desktop has the
> same requirement.
The
Is that a violation of a must directive and therefore a bug that will
need fixing ASAP? AIUI packages that have a GUI are required to have
debian menu, but I'm not sure if the window manager / desktop has the
same requirement.
--
And that's my crabbing done for the day. Got it out of the way ea
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 06:03:03PM +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> Stefano Zacchiroli writes:
> > Actually, this is something I've been pondering about for a
> > while. Having /etc under some VCS (as many of us, I presume, already
> > have by the means of etckeeper and similar tools), diff file m
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:28:39 -0500
Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking at getting a video card, and I want to know what video
> card that has 3D acceleration to get. Normally I'd ask on -users but
> as the subject says I want to know what video cards will still have
> acceleration whe
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
