On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 11:15:36PM +, Enrico Zini wrote:
> But did I recall reading that Alioth, or debian.org, can be OpenID
> providers? If I can use that, I solved the problem, otherwise, I
> may just postpone implementing authenticated stuff until handy
> OpenID providers happen in Debian.
Hi,
thanks for valuable comments. The original description was meant as a kind of
mathematical joke, since the task of proving a theorem is in general
undecidable, so any theorem prover will get stuck forever on many (or most)
inputs. I didn't realize at first that tis would actually discour
On Sun, Feb 22 2009, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 22 2009, Jörg Sommer wrote:
>>> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Sat, Feb 21 2009, Jörg Sommer wrote:
>
> Right, but when I hook into apt-get, I can get the configuration file
> shipped with the packages.
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > But what (besides web crawling) is the (legal) purpose of that? And why
> > does it need a word list?
>
> Presumably it is a useful tool as part of a security professional's
> penetration testing too
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> But what (besides web crawling) is the (legal) purpose of that? And why
> does it need a word list?
Presumably it is a useful tool as part of a security professional's
penetration testing toolbox?
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/Paul
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 05:18:39PM -0800, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> I think that the description explains that the purpose is to find hidden
> directories on web servers, presumably either your own or other people's.
Why would you need to find directories on your own server?
--
Noah Slater, http:/
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 02/22/2009 04:39 PM, Maximilian Gaß wrote:
Description : scan webservers for hidden directories (forced browsing)
w3bfukk0r is a forced browsing tool, it basically scans webservers
(HTTP/HTTPS) for a directory by using HTTP HEAD command and brut
On 02/22/2009 07:18 PM, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 02/22/2009 04:39 PM, Maximilian Gaß wrote:
Description : scan webservers for hidden directories (forced
browsing)
w3bfukk0r is a forced browsing tool, it basically scans webservers
(HTTP/HTTPS) for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: sysbench
Version: 0.4.10
Upstream Author: Alexey Kopytov (kaamos at users.sourceforge.net)
URL: http://sysbench.sourceforge.net
L
On 02/22/2009 04:39 PM, Maximilian Gaß wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Maximilian Gaß"
* Package name: w3bfukk0r
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Nico Golde and Andreas Krennmair
* URL : http://www.ngolde.de/w3bfukk0r.html
* License : MIT
Pr
Enrico Zini writes:
> About authenticated access:
>
> - I do not want to maintain another user/password database: this
> should be done with Openid
I heartily applaud this decision.
> and a whitelist of identity providers that every DD can easily use
> (like alioth or debian)
What of those
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22 2009, Jörg Sommer wrote:
>> Frank Küster wrote:
>>> Jörg Sommer wrote:
>>>
Right, but when I hook into apt-get, I can get the configuration file
shipped with the packages.
>>>
>>> You cannot, since the very purpose of ucf is to give dpkg-conffi
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22 2009, Jörg Sommer wrote:
>> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>> On Sat, Feb 21 2009, Jörg Sommer wrote:
Right, but when I hook into apt-get, I can get the configuration file
shipped with the packages. But that has nothing to do with ucf.
>>>
>>>
Just a couple of process notes.
Sam Hartman writes:
> I propose to upload a version of krb5 to unstable in about a week that
> is basically identical to the krb5 in experimental. I will include some
> debconf fixes, a news file, and other minor changes. See the
> experimental branch of [2] for
[There are some questions at the end; comments would be greatly
appreciated on the questions if you have ever been involved in the
release process or library transitions before. This is my first big
transition.]
The libkrb53 package (providing the MIT Kerberos shared libraries) has
been stable f
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 04:32:06PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Enrico Zini wrote:
> [...]
> > - I do not want to maintain another user/password database: this should
> >be done with Openid and a whitelist of identity providers that every
> >DD can easily use (like alioth or debian)
>
Hi,
>
> Why not use the DDs and DMs keyrings? just make them sign a given random
> token and submit it.
Debtags used to have a very liberal contribution policy - anonymous - and
that helped a lot getting the intial data in.
It has always been a goal to make contributing to Debtags as easy as
poss
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Maximilian Gaß"
* Package name: w3bfukk0r
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Nico Golde and Andreas Krennmair
* URL : http://www.ngolde.de/w3bfukk0r.html
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C
Description : scan webse
Enrico Zini wrote:
[...]
>
> - I do not want to maintain another user/password database: this should
>be done with Openid and a whitelist of identity providers that every
>DD can easily use (like alioth or debian)
>
Why not use the DDs and DMs keyrings? just make them sign a given rando
On Sun, Feb 22 2009, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 21 2009, Jörg Sommer wrote:
>>>
>>> Right, but when I hook into apt-get, I can get the configuration file
>>> shipped with the packages. But that has nothing to do with ucf.
>>
>> What does "hook into apt-get
On Sun, Feb 22 2009, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> Frank Küster wrote:
>> Jörg Sommer wrote:
>>
>>> Right, but when I hook into apt-get, I can get the configuration file
>>> shipped with the packages.
>>
>> You cannot, since the very purpose of ucf is to give dpkg-conffile-like
>> behavior
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guillaume Yziquel
* Package name: pgocaml
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Richard W.M. Jones
* URL : http://developer.berlios.de/projects/pgocaml/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : OCaml typ
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jan Hendrik den Besten
* Package name: fudgit
Version : 2.43-gudjon
Upstream Author : Jan Hendrik den Besten
* URL : http://www.bbphotonics.eu/fudgit
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : A double-pr
On 2009-02-22 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * Andreas Metzler [090222 17:42 +0100]
>> On 2009-02-22 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
[...]
>>> I want to prepare alsa-lib 1.0.19 for upload. Building alsa-lib on i386 and
>>> amd64 gives:
>>> ...
>>> checking for strip... strip
>>> checking for cross-compile
Hi Frank,
Frank Küster wrote:
> Jörg Sommer wrote:
>
>> Right, but when I hook into apt-get, I can get the configuration file
>> shipped with the packages.
>
> You cannot, since the very purpose of ucf is to give dpkg-conffile-like
> behavior for configuration files *not* shipped in the package
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21 2009, Jörg Sommer wrote:
>>
>> Right, but when I hook into apt-get, I can get the configuration file
>> shipped with the packages. But that has nothing to do with ucf.
>
> What does "hook into apt-get" mean?
I use the hooks Pre-Install-Pkgs and Pos
Hi Steve,
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:09:52PM +, Jörg Sommer wrote:
>> save_original
>> merge_with_current
>> export UCF_FORCE_CONFFOLD=1
>> ucf.etcgit "$@"
>
> So this will leave the ucf db with a horribly incorrect view
Which bit in ucf's database would become invali
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Enrico Zini wrote:
- workflow changes:
- form subcommittees by broad topics: "The Gnome Guys", "The KDE Guys",
"The Web Developers", "The Photographers" and so on, and give them
the ultimate say on a set of tags, including being able to say "these
packages
On Sun, Feb 22 2009, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> I think the correct thing for the wrapper to do is
>> a) change branch to the upstram_version_branch, and commit the new
>> upstream.
>> b) Change back to the local branch
>> c) run ucf and let the user do the
On 2009-02-22 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: normal
> Hi Debian ALSA developers,
> I want to prepare alsa-lib 1.0.19 for upload. Building alsa-lib on i386 and
> amd64 gives:
> ...
> checking for strip... strip
> checking for cross-compiler... i486-i486-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
> c
Hello,
I've started to ponder a decent redesign of the Debtags web interface,
that will be hosted at debtags.debian.net. I'd like to post here my
intentions, as a sort of RFC. Comments are welcome.
New features that I think are needed:
- workflow changes:
- form subcommittees by broad top
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 17 février 2009 à 00:31 -0500, Michael S. Gilbert a écrit :
>> 2. Components of the package may stop working in the midst of a
>> stable release's lifetime
>
> This is a problem that affects much more than this kind of packages. All
> packages relying on an exte
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 09:57:04AM +0100, Petr Pudlak wrote:
> * Package name: eprover
> Description : The Equational Theorem Prover E
That is not a description, that is just the name spelled out. A better
description would be "equational theorem prover".
> E is an automated equational
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi Debian ALSA developers,
I want to prepare alsa-lib 1.0.19 for upload. Building alsa-lib on i386 and
amd64 gives:
...
checking for strip... strip
checking for cross-compiler... i486-i486-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
checking for i486-linux-gnu-gcc... i486-i486-pc-linux-gnu-gc
Jörg Sommer wrote:
> Right, but when I hook into apt-get, I can get the configuration file
> shipped with the packages.
You cannot, since the very purpose of ucf is to give dpkg-conffile-like
behavior for configuration files *not* shipped in the package.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Debian
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I think the correct thing for the wrapper to do is
> a) change branch to the upstram_version_branch, and commit the new
> upstream.
> b) Change back to the local branch
> c) run ucf and let the user do their thing (replace, not replace, edit,
> whatever
Steve Langasek wrote:
Also unsurprisingly (to me, given my observations that had led to the post
in the first place), no one else has yet stepped up to be an alpha porter
for squeeze.
What is involved in this job? What is the time commitment? What is the
needed experience?
Up to now I
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Petr Pudlak
* Package name: eprover
Version : 1.0.004
Upstream Author : Stephan Schulz
* URL : http://www.eprover.org/
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: C
Description : The Equational Theorem Prover E
E is an
38 matches
Mail list logo
