Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: liborigin2
Version: 20081216
Upstream Author: Alex Kargovsky
URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/liborigin
License: GPL
Description: library for reading OriginLab Origin 7.5 project files
liborigin2 is a
Hi,
Kees Cook wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 03:10:37PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
>> How about either matching stuff against the build logs or recompiling
> I didn't have the resources to do this, but it's be great if someone could.
If you have the means of recompiling, say with pbuilder,
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 10:10:24PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> But the way you wrote in 4 as "we will make any private discussions
> publically available at the earliest opportunity." is problematic since
> it is 100% disclosure pledge. I suggest something along "we will make
> any private discussio
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Adeodato Simó wrote:
>> Attached is a list of affected packages,
>
> Piping through dd-list(1) gives:
>
> LI Daobing
> liblunar
forwarded to upstream, and he will fix it in next release.
> openbabel (U)
left to debichem team.
--
Best Regards,
LI Daobing
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 10:03:20AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 03:02:41PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Using the word "software" as the basis for the divide might be too much:
> I'm not convinced that leaving important parts of Debian undocumented
> over doctrinal disput
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008, Kees Cook wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 03:10:37PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
How about either matching stuff against the build logs or recompiling
I didn't have the resources to do this, but it's be great if someone could.
I'll work on this now.
-- Asheesh.
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 10:27:16AM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 00:42:46 -0800 Kees Cook wrote:
> > In Debian, some tools already compile natively with -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2,
> > and some have Build-Depends on "hardening-wrapper", which enables this
> > compiler flag. As such,
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 03:10:37PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> How about either matching stuff against the build logs or recompiling
I didn't have the resources to do this, but it's be great if someone could.
> with a compiler that actually fails when asked to compile a file that
> match
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 01:51:45PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 12:42:46AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> > samba
>
> Another false positive, AFAICS:
>
> $ pcregrep -rM 'sprintf\s*\(\s*([^,]*)\s*,\s*"%s[^"]*"\s*,\s*\1\s*,' source
> source/libads/kerberos.c: fname = tall
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:45:56 +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Freedom of speech is a constitutional disposition, and I don't think it is
> something that could be acheive. It really is a constitutional act.
>
> It is also why I am against the Code of Conduct. Freedom of speech is an
> utopism tha
Thomas Viehmann writes:
> Andreas Tille wrote:
>> Args - I've read this and intended to use in both cases mkstemp - but
>> then just forgot this. I think just for reading files mktemp is fine.
>> The rationale is that I do not really want to rewrite the reading
>> routine which opens the file to
Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Dec 2008, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
>
>> Never use mktemp().
>
> Args - I've read this and intended to use in both cases mkstemp - but then
> just forgot this. I think just for reading files mktemp is fine. The
> rationale is that I do not really want to rewrite
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Never use mktemp().
Args - I've read this and intended to use in both cases mkstemp - but then
just forgot this. I think just for reading files mktemp is fine. The
rationale is that I do not really want to rewrite the reading routine
which opens
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 03:16:05PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Mike Hommey:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 03:01:19PM +0100, Florian Weimer
> > wrote:
> >> * Theodore Tso:
> >>
> >> > I'm not ashamed at all; I joined before the 1.1 revision to the Debian
> >> > Social Contract, which I obje
* Gerfried Fuchs:
>> For instance, while I have no particular opinion on firmware, I object
>> to packages in main which, when run on a web browser, execute
>> proprietary Javascript blobs (either by shipping them in the package,
>> or by linking them in some way).
>
> But it is. The web browser
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Aramian Wasielak
* Package name: coinor-osi
Version : 0.99.1
Upstream Author : Matthew Saltzman , and others
* URL : https://projects.coin-or.org/Osi
* License : CPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : COIN-OR Op
On 12/29/08 03:55, Peter Tuhársky wrote:
gregor herrmann wrote / napísal(a):
Maybe you missed the "old enough" in Lisi's mail.
In Austria for example equal rights between man and woman in a
marriage exist only since 1975.
Cf. http://www.demokratiezentrum.org/media/pdf/info_familienrecht.pdf
Hi,
Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Dec 2008, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
>
>> Oh, and if you really care, be sure that it's a regular file (not a
>> symlink pointing to something) owned by yourself before using it as a
>> hint to kill your processes.
>
> Thanks for your hints. I've prepared a pat
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 04:20:28PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 09:11:01AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > FSF), Dynebolic, Musix GNU+Linux, BLAG, and Trisquel. So not only is
> > there one such distribution that takes free software of cardinal
> > importance, there are six
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Oh, and if you really care, be sure that it's a regular file (not a
symlink pointing to something) owned by yourself before using it as a
hint to kill your processes.
Thanks for your hints. I've prepared a patch at
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/deb
Romain Beauxis writes:
> Le Monday 29 December 2008 17:21:16 Theodore Tso, vous avez écrit :
>> I do feel quite strongly, that aspirational goals, if they are going to
>> be in Foundation Documents, must be clearly *labelled* as aspirational
>> goals, and not as inflexible mandates that _MUST_ be
Loïc Minier writes:
> (I have no idea why it's not mentionned anymore.) Yes, the program is
> still used; it's in charge of generating
>/usr/share/applications/mimeinfo.cache (and
> /usr/local/share/applications/mimeinfo.cache); these files may then be
> used by e.g. gio (in GLib) to
* Florian Weimer [2008-12-29 15:01:19 CET]:
> * Theodore Tso:
> > I'm not ashamed at all; I joined before the 1.1 revision to the Debian
> > Social Contract, which I objected to them, and I still object to now.
> > If there was a GR which chainged the Debian Social contract which
> > relaxed the f
On Tuesday 30 December 2008 03:44:26 Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dimanche 28 décembre 2008 à 15:38 +0100, Evgeni Golov a écrit :
> > On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 00:04:58 +1000 Kel Modderman wrote:
> >
> > > Touchfreeze docks in your system tray and disables your touchpad
> > > while typing. It re-enabl
#include
* Noah Slater [Mon, Dec 29 2008, 10:13:10AM]:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 10:55:54AM +0100, Peter Tuhársky wrote:
> > There are many things people did and do wrong. Enslaving anyone if bad.
> > Irrespectedly of gender. However, the feminism of its current shape, in
> > countries where no di
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 7:54 AM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 09:55:36PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> I wish we could have in the world of GNU/Linux one, just one,
>> please--just one--distribution which really took free software as of
>> cardinal importance. Debian ha
#include
* Anil Gulecha [Mon, Dec 29 2008, 10:49:31PM]:
> Hi,
>
> If debian/control defines many binary packages, and I only want to
> build one of them, is there a simpler method than modifying the
> control file and removing the unneeded ones? Perhaps by passing a
> particular argument to dpkg-
Le dimanche 28 décembre 2008 à 15:38 +0100, Evgeni Golov a écrit :
> On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 00:04:58 +1000 Kel Modderman wrote:
>
> > Touchfreeze docks in your system tray and disables your touchpad
> > while typing. It re-enables your touchpad when typing stops, using a
> > configurable delay tim
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gunnar Wolf
* Package name: libwirble-ruby
Version : 0.1.2
Upstream Author : Paul Duncan
* URL : http://pablotron.org/software/wirble
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description : extensions for the Rub
> I think the problem is not really the social contract, what it currently
> says is just fine, and we all agree with it.
ACK.
> We have free stuff, which is in main, and non-free stuff of diverse
> variety, which is in non-free (plus the hybrid contrib).
>
> My own guess is that all those clamo
Hi,
If debian/control defines many binary packages, and I only want to
build one of them, is there a simpler method than modifying the
control file and removing the unneeded ones? Perhaps by passing a
particular argument to dpkg-buildpackage?
--
Anil
http://www.gulecha.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
Le Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 10:10:51AM +, Noah Slater a écrit :
>
> [citation needed]
>
> [citation needed]
>
> [citation needed]
>
> [citation needed]
>
Hi all,
while I can not tell for debian-women, I would like to stress out that for
debian-devel, what is needed is not citations but the e
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2008-12-29
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: mbrola-en1
Version : 19980910
Upstream Author : Faculte Polytechnique de Mons - mbrola team
* URL : http://tcts.fpms.ac.be/synthesis
* License : see the file readme.txt in t
Le Monday 29 December 2008 17:21:16 Theodore Tso, vous avez écrit :
> I do feel quite strongly, that aspirational goals, if they are going
> to be in Foundation Documents, must be clearly *labelled* as
> aspirational goals, and not as inflexible mandates that _MUST_ be
> kept. In politics, can hav
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 04:38:25PM +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
>
> To me, the social contract is a very good compromise. It states first an
> idealist acheivement, but moderates it by some pragmatism concerning the
> users. "unproductive" discussions fall into the same category, when they do
>
Hi,
Sven asked me to forward this message to the list. Since it does not
contain any of the vitriol for which he was expelled from the project,
and since it does contain some valid points on the discussion in
question, I decided to comply with his request.
I'd like to say, though, that this does
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 09:55:36PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> I wish we could have in the world of GNU/Linux one, just one,
> please--just one--distribution which really took free software as of
> cardinal importance. Debian has promised to be that, while living up to
> the promise only i
(Resending a previous private answer to Theodore since I believe it is
relevant to the discussion..)
Le Monday 29 December 2008 15:11:01 Theodore Tso, vous avez écrit :
> As I said in my recent blog entry[1], I believe that "100% free" is a
> wonderful aspirational goal --- other things being equ
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 03:02:41PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Using the word "software" as the basis for the divide might be too much:
> we've already done a lot of work restricting main to DFSG-free docs, and
> I think it makes sense to keep that. Having main be a functioning bunch
> of free st
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 09:11:01AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> As others have pointed out, there is such a distribution, gNewSense; in
> fact, if you look at [2], you will find that there are five others,
> Ututu (the first fully free GNU/Linux distribution recognized by the
> FSF), Dynebolic, Mu
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 09:55:36PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>
> I would prefer this. But I am afraid of it, and so I would vote against
> it. I am afraid that there are folks in the project who really don't
> care if Debian is 100% free--even as a goal. I think that Ted Tso is
> even o
* Mike Hommey:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 03:01:19PM +0100, Florian Weimer
> wrote:
>> * Theodore Tso:
>>
>> > I'm not ashamed at all; I joined before the 1.1 revision to the Debian
>> > Social Contract, which I objected to them, and I still object to now.
>> > If there was a GR which chainged t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastien Delafond
* Package name: icicles
Version : 22.0+2008-12-27
Upstream Author : Drew Adams
* URL : http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/Icicles
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Lisp
Description : an emacs libra
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 03:01:19PM +0100, Florian Weimer
wrote:
> * Theodore Tso:
>
> > I'm not ashamed at all; I joined before the 1.1 revision to the Debian
> > Social Contract, which I objected to them, and I still object to now.
> > If there was a GR which chainged the Debian Social contract
* Theodore Tso:
> I'm not ashamed at all; I joined before the 1.1 revision to the Debian
> Social Contract, which I objected to them, and I still object to now.
> If there was a GR which chainged the Debian Social contract which
> relaxed the first clause to only include __software__ running on th
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 03:02:41PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 08:45:16PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 12:48:24AM +, Simon Huggins wrote:
> > > I wonder how many DDs were ashamed to vote the titled "Reaffirm the
> > > social contract" low
* Thomas Bushnell BSG [Sun, 28 Dec 2008 21:55:36 -0800]:
> I wish we could have in the world of GNU/Linux one, just one,
> please--just one--distribution which really took free software as of
> cardinal importance.
I don't like the wording of your sentence, but I'll point out that
gNewSense alrea
On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 09:53:40 +0100 Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Evgeni Golov
>desmume (U)
Forwarded upstream, they'll fix that asap.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Monday 29 December 2008 21:26, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > It is anecdotal gender profiling that causes women and men to choose
> > certain paths through life in the first place, and is hence one of the
> > root causes of the very problem we're trying to solve.
>
> Interesting discussion. But as N
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
> 1. The update-desktop-database program used to be documented in the
>desktop entry spec in version 0.9.5 and was removed in 0.9.6 (the
>current version is 1.0). Should I draw some conclusion from that? Is
>this program and cache likely to go
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 10:10:51AM +, Noah Slater wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 10:39:50AM +0100, Peter Tuhársky wrote:
> > For me, the answer is quite simple. The computing is almost technical
> > industry, and therefore it is naturally more suitable for men, who are
> > naturally strog in
I have a new email address!You can now email me at: mar_tinden...@ymail.com
Sir/Madam,
Ive business to discuss with you, please contact me, for more details
Dent
- Martin Dent
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 10:55:54AM +0100, Peter Tuhársky wrote:
> There are many things people did and do wrong. Enslaving anyone if bad.
> Irrespectedly of gender. However, the feminism of its current shape, in
> countries where no discrimination is pushed on women, is making the same
> mistake, j
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 10:39:50AM +0100, Peter Tuhársky wrote:
> For me, the answer is quite simple. The computing is almost technical
> industry, and therefore it is naturally more suitable for men, who are
> naturally strog in technical thinking and achieving the task milestones.
> Just like the
Estimad@ amig@:
Desde ahora tiene la posibilidad de poder ganar dinero
trabajando desde su Casa y de manera fácil.
Si usted nos elige deberá procesar correos electrónicos.
Para procesar correos tendrá que seguir unos sencillos pasos que le mostraremos.
Si usted puede procesar 20 correos electróni
gregor herrmann wrote / napísal(a):
Maybe you missed the "old enough" in Lisi's mail.
In Austria for example equal rights between man and woman in a
marriage exist only since 1975.
Cf. http://www.demokratiezentrum.org/media/pdf/info_familienrecht.pdf
Well, I've heard, that formally, a slavery
Amaya wrote / napísal(a):
By creating Debian Women, we are sending out the message that it is
definitely ok to be a female and and a geek, and we aim to create
visibility for those female users, developers, contributors... so that
they can serve as 'role models', or inspiration for other males
On Sun, 28 Dec 2008, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Therefore I think it's neither necessary nor appropriate for libpam-modules
> to avoid a pre-dependency on debconf.
>
> Is it ok to make libpam-modules Pre-Depends: debconf (>= 0.5) | debconf-2.0
> for lenny?
I think so. We already have many predepende
]] Steve Langasek
(Not wearing any particular hat here)
[...]
| Is it ok to make libpam-modules Pre-Depends: debconf (>= 0.5) | debconf-2.0
| for lenny?
Yes, I think this sounds reasonable (and your analysis looks good to me).
[...]
| So is it ok to also make libpam-modules Pre-Depends: ${sh
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Anyway, given the last proposal I made [0] went nowhere, unless people
> want to come up with their own proposals, or want to second the above as
> a draft proposal to be improved and voted on, I suspect nothing much will
> change, and we'll have this dis
60 matches
Mail list logo
