On Wednesday 17 December 2008 10:55, Tzafrir Cohen
wrote:
> > The Fedora vs RHEL model that Red Hat uses has some benefits.
>
> The Fedora and RHEL is:
>
> Fedora: a somewhat equivalent of Debian Testing. The rules for updating
> a package even after a version is released are way more laxed than
On Thursday 18 December 2008 11:45, Brian May
wrote:
> Margarita Manterola wrote:
> > If we do all this, we would be voting:
> >
> > A) If we trust or not the release team on making the right choices of
> > which bugs to ignore and which not (regardless of this being firmware
> > issues or what h
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Just in case anyone cares/is interested, here is some work I have been doing
> on packages using Gtk1.2, Imlib, gnome-libs, or any combination thereof.
The playdv binary from libdv-bin can be dropped until it is ported to
GTK+ 2, bug filed
Margarita Manterola wrote:
If we do all this, we would be voting:
A) If we trust or not the release team on making the right choices of
which bugs to ignore and which not (regardless of this being firmware
issues or what have you). This is from now on, not just for Lenny.
B) If we want to allo
>
> GTK+ 1.2 has been deprecated upstream for 6 years. There is no security
> support for it, and no new applications using it have been out for quite
> a long time as well.
>
>
> Here is a first list of packages that could either be removed right now
> because they seem to have replacements, or
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
* Package name: libproxy
Version : 0.2.3
Upstream Author : Nathaniel McCallum
Alex Panait
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/libproxy/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>If there is sufficient support, we could also scrap the current
> vote, change our ballot, add options to it, or something, and restart
> the vote, but that would need a strong grass roots support (I do not
> think the secretary
On Wed, Dec 17 2008, David Weinehall wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 01:54:40PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 15 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
>>
>> > Thomas Weber writes:
>> >> Am Montag, den 15.12.2008, 10:06 + schrieb Steve McIntyre:
>> >
>> >>> I've been talking with Manoj a
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 01:54:40PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> > Thomas Weber writes:
> >> Am Montag, den 15.12.2008, 10:06 + schrieb Steve McIntyre:
> >
> >>> I've been talking with Manoj already, in private to try and avoid
> >>> flaming. I
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Barry deFreese wrote:
sqlrelay
Some of the binaries have decent popcons. We could probably either port
sqlrelay-config-gtk or just remove that binary for now.
I'd also strongly vote for only droping this specific binary in case this
would be a Gtk 1.2 removal blocker b
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 02:16:37PM -0500, Cristian Paul Peñaranda Rojas wrote:
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> Package: pmwiki
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: cristian paul peñaranda rojas
>
> * Package name : pmwiki
> Version : 2.2.0
> Upstream Author : Patrick R
On Mon, Dec 15 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Thomas Weber writes:
>> Am Montag, den 15.12.2008, 10:06 + schrieb Steve McIntyre:
>
>>> I've been talking with Manoj already, in private to try and avoid
>>> flaming. I specifically asked him to delay this vote until the numerous
>>> problems with i
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 14 2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 03:02:17AM +, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
>> And FWIW I still believe this vote is an horrible mix-up of really
>> different things, is completely confusing, and I've no clue how to vote.
>>
On Sun, Dec 14 2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 03:02:17AM +, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
>
>> --
>> Choice 2: Allow Lenny to release with proprietary firmware [3:1]
>> == == = = == ==
Hi,
This whole set of discussions and proposals started a couple of
months ago, when concerns were raised about firmware blobs, dfsg
violations, and the release. This, after a round of disuccion, led to
three proposals on how the release should be conducted, in view of
firmware blobs c
Hi folks,
Just in case anyone cares/is interested, here is some work I have been
doing on packages using Gtk1.2, Imlib, gnome-libs, or any combination
thereof.
Obviously some packages fall within more than one rdepend/rbdepend.
gnome-libs:
bluefish
Actually built with gtk2 but still bui
Mustafa KYR wrote:
> Hello,
> I am a new engineer and I was just a debian user in my former life. I want
> to build debian linux from sources to understand it all. I spent lots of
> time during search about it.
I'm not sure how much building from source will help your understanding,
but anyway, ht
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: gdcm
Version : 2.0.10
Upstream Author : Mathieu Malaterre
* URL : http://gdcm.sourceforge.net
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C, C++, C#, Python, Java
Description : DICOM libr
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 12/17/08 03:57, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>>
>> Package: wnpp
>> Severity: wishlist
>> Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
>>
>>
>> * Package name: pvrg
>> Version : 1.2.1
>> Upstream Author : Andy C. Hung
>> * URL : ftp://ha
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 12/17/08 03:29, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>>
>> Package: wnpp
>> Severity: wishlist
>> Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
>>
>>
>> * Package name: dicomscope
>> Version : 3.5.1
>> Upstream Author : OFFIS DICOM Team
>> * URL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Krzysztof Krzyżaniak (eloy)"
* Package name: libclass-c3-adopt-next-perl
Version : 0.04
Upstream Author : Florian Ragwitz C
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Class-C3-Adopt-NEXT/
* License : Dual (Perl): GPL/Artistic
On 12/17/08 03:57, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: pvrg
Version : 1.2.1
Upstream Author : Andy C. Hung
* URL : ftp://havefun.stanford.edu:pub/jpeg/JPEGv1.2.tar.Z.
$ mtr havefun.stanford.edu
Couldn
On 12/17/08 03:29, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: dicomscope
Version : 3.5.1
Upstream Author : OFFIS DICOM Team
* URL : http://dicom.offis.de/dscope.php.en
* License : Copyright (C) 1994-20
Hi,
please check http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/
regards
CC Vural
> Hello,
> I am a new engineer and I was just a debian user in my former
> life. I want to build debian linux from sources to understand it all.
> I spent lots of time during search about it. Do we have a script or
> sth else in
Hello,
I am a new engineer and I was just a debian user in my former life. I want
to build debian linux from sources to understand it all. I spent lots of
time during search about it. Do we have a script or sth else in sources
cd. I want to create whole linux which is in installable cd. Please give
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: pvrg
Version : 1.2.1
Upstream Author : Andy C. Hung
* URL : ftp://havefun.stanford.edu:pub/jpeg/JPEGv1.2.tar.Z.
* License : PUBLIC DOMAIN LICENSE
Programming Lang: C
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Actually I don’t think we should recommend testing at all to desktop
> users.
Why?
>Except during freeze times, I find unstable to be much more
> usable, and keep testing for (non-production) servers.
IMHO, there i
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: dicomscope
Version : 3.5.1
Upstream Author : OFFIS DICOM Team
* URL : http://dicom.offis.de/dscope.php.en
* License : Copyright (C) 1994-2004, OFFIS
Programming Lang: C, C++
Descrip
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Agustin Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 02:14:29PM +0100, Michael Hanke wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 02:06:40PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
>> > On mar, 2008-12-16 at 13:57 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> > > Description : Tools for han
"Daniel Moerner" wrote:
Hi,
> Obviously, having more users test unstable is good. However, I agree
> that it's not necessarily a big issue. A good deal of RC-bugs are
> related to FTBFS, security advisories, package conflicts, and the
> like. These bugs can pop up independently of how much te
Josselin Mouette wrote:
Hi,
> Maybe that’s because I maintain packages with a large audience, but I
> don’t find that effect very important.
You're right about the large audience, it does make quite a
difference.
> Actually I don’t think we should recommend testing at all to desktop
> users.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Rene Engelhard
* Package name: libmysqlcppconn-dev
Version : 1.0.2 snapshot
Upstream Author : MySQL AB, Sun Microsystems Inc.
* URL : http://forge.mysql.com/wiki/Connector_C++
* License : GPL v2 with "FLOSS exception"
P
32 matches
Mail list logo
