Re: SmellyWerewolf.com perfume & make-up discount

Quoting Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > I apologize for sending this email to d-d-a instead of -devel. It could > have conveyed the same message without abusing the project resources. Thanks for this, Joss...whatever one thinks of the content of your post, the two sentences above are very

Bug#506837: ITP: minisapserver -- Mini SAP server

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Antonin Kral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: minisapserver Version : 0.3.5 Upstream Author : multiple * URL : http://www.videolan.org * License : GPL Programming Lang: C Description : Mini SAP server Mini SAP

Re: SmellyWerewolf.com perfume & make-up discount

On Nov 24, 2008, at 5:13 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: - The use of the word "chick" in reference to females. Chick is a slightly derogatory, condescending common usage (slang) expression for a young woman. So "linuxchix.org" is a slightly derogatory, condescending domain name for young wom

Re: SmellyWerewolf.com perfume & make-up discount

can you all please stop discussing this email? it is pointless On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > On Mon, Nov 24 2008, Amaya wrote: > > > Eduard Bloch wrote: > >> * Miriam Ruiz [Mon, Nov 24 2008, 12:07:53AM]: > >> > Sorry but Debian is not a men's club a

Re: SmellyWerewolf.com perfume & make-up discount

On Mon, Nov 24 2008, Amaya wrote: > Eduard Bloch wrote: >> * Miriam Ruiz [Mon, Nov 24 2008, 12:07:53AM]: >> > Sorry but Debian is not a men's club and we're not their "chicks". >> >> Come on, peace! I respect you as woman or man or whoever you are, there >> is no need to polarize the discussion.

Re: SmellyWerewolf.com perfume & make-up discount

Eduard Bloch wrote: > * Miriam Ruiz [Mon, Nov 24 2008, 12:07:53AM]: > > Sorry but Debian is not a men's club and we're not their "chicks". > > Come on, peace! I respect you as woman or man or whoever you are, there > is no need to polarize the discussion. Well, you can't simply ask people to not

Re: Bits from the buildd.debian.org world

Adeodato Simó wrote: A new team has been created (gid: wbadm) to maintain the wanna-build infrastructure (that is, the software that tells the autobuilders what to build, plus the pages you see in ). The team is initially formed by: * Andreas Barth * Marc Brock

Re: Bits from the buildd.debian.org world

On Mon, 24 Nov 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote: > However, a buildd.debian.org pseudo-package has been requested in > the BTS, The buildd.debian.org psuedo-package is now in place; there will be a slight delay while everything catches up, but you can use it immediately. Don Armstrong -- We cast this

Re: can buildd logs be sorted (again)?

On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 08:04:46PM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote: > * Steve M. Robbins [Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:42:06 -0500]: > > > Hi, > > > The buildd log pages, e.g. [1], used to be sorted by package version > > (or maybe build date). However that is no longer the case. > > > Can this be fixed? T

Re: SmellyWerewolf.com perfume & make-up discount

On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 11:04:18AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: >> In my opinion, which is as humble as it can be (but that might not >> mean much), I fail to see Joss' post as sexist. From its first line >> it is a parod

Re: SmellyWerewolf.com perfume & make-up discount

Frank Küster dijo [Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 09:11:14PM +0100]: > >> > - The only mention women get in the text is thus through a sexual > >> > objetification. > >> > >> This amounts to concluding that any mention of sexuality is sexual > >> objectification of women, which is patently absurd. > > > > N

Re: Bits from the buildd.debian.org world

Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * the role address for the wanna-build team is [EMAIL PROTECTED] > However, a buildd.debian.org pseudo-package has been requested in the > BTS, Many thanks for these improvements, especially the one I cited! Regards, Frank -- Frank Kü

Re: SmellyWerewolf.com perfume & make-up discount

Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 12:07:53AM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote: >> > - The only mention women get in the text is thus through a sexual >> > objetification. >> >> This amounts to concluding that any mention of sex

Re: can buildd logs be sorted (again)?

Adeodato Simó wrote: > I fixed this to sort entries by age, HTH. > Thomas: I didn't have the PHP-energy to look at integrating your patch > at this stage, prod me about it in the future if you'd like. Well, I cannot blame you. I do not intend to keep it lying around when it's not used, though. So

Re: can buildd logs be sorted (again)?

* Steve M. Robbins [Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:42:06 -0500]: > Hi, > The buildd log pages, e.g. [1], used to be sorted by package version > (or maybe build date). However that is no longer the case. > Can this be fixed? The current situation is less than useful since > the latest build is buried in o

Re: SmellyWerewolf.com perfume & make-up discount

On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 11:04:18AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > In my opinion, which is as humble as it can be (but that might not > mean much), I fail to see Joss' post as sexist. From its first line > it is a parody, something that very clearly should not be taken > seriously. Not that I like it -

Re: SmellyWerewolf.com perfume & make-up discount

Hi again, Le dimanche 23 novembre 2008 à 17:59 +0100, Josselin Mouette a écrit : > SmellyWerewolf.com are kindly offering every Debian Developer a discount > on their whole perfumes and make-up catalog[1]. If you apply under the > procedure outlined below, you will pay according to "Rate Eeencredi

Re: SmellyWerewolf.com perfume & make-up discount

Russ Allbery dijo [Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 12:38:14PM -0800]: > >>> - Send your private Debian GPG Key to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Include > >>>the brand of your perfume and the color of the make-up. > > >> I find it disappointing to see this posted, and in bad taste. > > > /me guesses from when hav

Bug#506757: ITP: efte -- Text editor for programmers

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Xavier Oswald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: efte Version : 0.98 Upstream Author : Jeremy Cowgar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://efte.cowgar.com * License : GPL Programming Lang: C++ Description : Text edit

Re: SmellyWerewolf.com perfume & make-up discount

On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 03:51:07PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 12:07:53AM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote: > > > - The only mention women get in the text is thus through a sexual > > > objetification. > > > > This amounts to conclud

Bug#506752: ITP: ssake -- assembling millions of very short DNA sequences

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: ssake Version : 3.2.1 Upstream Author : Rene Warren * URL : http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake * License : GPL 2+ Programming Lang: Perl Description

Re: SmellyWerewolf.com perfume & make-up discount

On Monday 24 November 2008 07:38, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's not about whether or not the parody was funny.  It's that the same > parody could have been made, just as funny, without the completely > gratuitous sexism. We should note that it had already been determined that debi

Re: SmellyWerewolf.com perfume & make-up discount

* Noah Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-24 08:47]: > We are meant to point at this stuff and say "oh my, how inappropriate this > would > be! thank goodness this is humour" and then laugh a little. > > [...] Can we please just leave it at that though, instead of perpetuating a > terrible misu

Re: SmellyWerewolf.com perfume & make-up discount

On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 09:01:32AM +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > * Noah Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-23 22:07]: > > Please quote from the original email explaining to me how it is sexist. > > Well, I found the parody very offensive to men, in general. Heh, heh. Parody, satire, and pas

Re: SmellyWerewolf.com perfume & make-up discount

* Noah Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-23 22:07]: > Please quote from the original email explaining to me how it is sexist. Well, I found the parody very offensive to men, in general. Josselin's satire suggests that a male is a stupid creature who desperately looks for "chicks" or whichever