Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Aramian Wasielak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: coinor-vol
Version : 1.1.6
Upstream Author : Francisco Barahona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Laszlo Ladanyi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : https://projects.coin-or.org/Vol
* License
On Tuesday 7 October 2008 02:33, Charles Plessy wrote:
> as one of the maintainer of the packages affected by the mass bug filing
> named "The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian
> packages", I would like to make a comment:
>
> Most of these bugs can only be exploited by
On lun, 2008-10-06 at 21:28 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Debian Xfce Maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>xfce4-mpc-plugin
Not reproducible, waiting for infos, bug reporter not really available.
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 09:28:51PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>webkit (U)
>xulrunner
These two are only waiting for migration (unblock already in place)
iceweasel is another story. 2 of the RCs are about upstream security
releases, that might actually be xulrunner issues (I still have to
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 3:28 AM, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Debian Games Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> sabre
Fixed in sid, waiting on an unblock from the release managers and an
upload on s390.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>xine-lib (#498243)
Needs help. That report is a security report from ocert. The full report
can be seen here: http://www.ocert.org/analysis/2008-008/analysis.txt
all fixes from 1.1.15 are backported to debian
Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
>
>> Guenter Geiger (Debian/GNU) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>gem
>
> This was fixed by an NMU, but can't transition to testing due to dependency on
> libquicktime 2:1.0.3+debian-2. What to do in cases like this?
Contact the release team to see if it
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 05:56 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 06/10/08 at 18:36 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
[...]
> > > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >firmware-nonfree (U)
> > >mklibs (U)
> > >openldap (U)
> > >php5 (U)
> >
> > Steve stepped do
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Guenter Geiger (Debian/GNU) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>gem
This was fixed by an NMU, but can't transition to testing due to dependency on
libquicktime 2:1.0.3+debian-2. What to do in cases like this?
--
Felipe Sateler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
On 06/10/08 at 18:36 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > On 06/10/08 at 18:44 +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> >> For maintainers (Or: For everyone with some more experience)
> >> ===
> >>
> >> It basically boils down to two things: If your packages h
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 09:56:20PM -0400, Hubert Chathi wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 21:28:51 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> [...]
> > Debian GNUstep maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > gnustep-gui
>
> Fixed in t-p-u. Waiting to be built (for about a month!) on m68k,
> befor
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 21:28:51 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
[...]
> Debian GNUstep maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> gnustep-gui
Fixed in t-p-u. Waiting to be built (for about a month!) on m68k,
before in can migrate. (Which is kind of silly, since the bug shouldn't
even affe
Le Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 06:44:49PM +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl a écrit :
> Too many release critical bugs
Hi all,
as one of the maintainer of the packages affected by the mass bug filing
named "The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian
packages", I would like to make
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 06/10/08 at 18:44 +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
>> For maintainers (Or: For everyone with some more experience)
>> ===
>>
>> It basically boils down to two things: If your packages have RC bugs open
>> in "Lenny" fix them and take care, that the fi
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 11:13:22PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> We do have experimental...
It would be better to have a new place for that so we don't need to
abuse experimental. Preferably one that moves everything to unstable
post-release. Or call it unstable and resurrect 'frozen' for where the
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 15:24 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The description is misleading. This is (AFAICT) not an implementation of a
> standard but a clone product, like wine, and much like wine it lags behind to
> the real one. Please make that clear in the description to avoid lea
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 09:28:51PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>vim (U)
Working on a tpu upload to fix issues for Lenny.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 2008-10-06, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>sqlite3
>
> If this is 500792, I'm not sure what has gone wrong with this one - it
> was downgraded, fixed and then upgraded.
It just needs to migrate to lenny.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 09:28:51PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>matplotlib
Just in case someone observes this, a fixed version is ready in t-p-u,
and the release team has acknowledged this and shall be allowing this
in soon.
Thanks.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah
signature.asc
Description: Digit
Russell Coker wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 October 2008 07:25, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Is there any plan to fix things to allow separate uploads to testing and
>>> unstable for Lenny+1?
>> It's already existing, but we like packages to be tested *before* they
>> enter testing...
>>
>> Mu
On Tuesday 07 October 2008 07:25, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there any plan to fix things to allow separate uploads to testing and
> > unstable for Lenny+1?
>
> It's already existing, but we like packages to be tested *before* they
> enter testing...
>
> Much more aggressive remova
On Tuesday 16 September 2008 22:45, Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 14:12:13 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le dimanche 14 septembre 2008 à 21:32 +1000, Russell Coker a écrit :
> > > For a typical desktop system (such as my EeePC) a default installation
> >
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 06:38:12AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 September 2008 04:14, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This
> > cost me over one hour as bind lacks proper error messages in this code
> > path.
>
> Has that bug in bind (inadequate error reporting) been fix
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 21:28:51 +0200
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hideki Yamane (Debian-JP) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>naist-jdic
Tested latest version without problems - awaiting response but could
be closed or downgraded/re-assigned.
> Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Sorry for the delay in replying, you forgot to CC me...
On Tuesday 16 September 2008 22:12, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le dimanche 14 septembre 2008 à 21:32 +1000, Russell Coker a écrit :
> > For a typical desktop system (such as my EeePC) a default installation of
> > SE Linux
On Tuesday 16 September 2008 04:14, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This
> cost me over one hour as bind lacks proper error messages in this code
> path.
Has that bug in bind (inadequate error reporting) been fixed?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Blog
http
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Debian Install System Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> hw-detect
Does not affect testing. Version info added.
Fixed version will migrate to testing soon.
> libdebian-installer
Old latent bug; fixed version will migrate to testing soon.
> partman-base
> partman-lvm
> rootskel-g
Russell Coker wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 October 2008 03:44, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Oh, and if you could refrain from upload new upstream versions of
>> packages to "Sid", you would make all our lives easier. Some reasons:
>>
>> * New packages won't reach "Lenny" any
On Tuesday 07 October 2008 03:44, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh, and if you could refrain from upload new upstream versions of
> packages to "Sid", you would make all our lives easier. Some reasons:
>
> * New packages won't reach "Lenny" anyway.
> * Upload new packages
On 06/10/08 at 18:44 +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> For maintainers (Or: For everyone with some more experience)
> ===
>
> It basically boils down to two things: If your packages have RC bugs open
> in "Lenny" fix them and take care, that the fix will propagate to
> "Lenny".
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: kio-ftps-kde4
Version: 0.2-1
Upstream Author: Magnus Kulke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL: http://kasablanca.berlios.de/kio-ftps/
License: G
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Angel Abad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libcatalyst-action-rest-perl
Version : 0.66
Upstream Author : Adam Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~jshirley/Catalyst-Action-REST-0.66/
* License : P
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 03:33:48PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> [2] http://www.microsoft.com/interop/msnovellcollab/moonlight.mspx
Btw, an independent analisys of that covenant is available:
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20080528133529454
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy
On 2008-10-05, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FWIW this problem is found in many other cases: see lighttpd with
> apache2 installed, or caudium or any other http daemon, and none of them
> has a bug about it, it's unfair to mark it as RC.
also note that this bug isn't symmetric with
Hi,
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>> Next try: http://194.39.182.225/debian/xen/try4.
> Hmm.. these packages are not available anymore?
> URL changed?
Your local Debian sid mirror, e.g. package
xen-linux-system-2.6.26-1-xen-amd64.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
--
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 03:24:26PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Description : open source implementation of Microsoft Silverlight
> >
> > [...]
>
> Hi,
>
> The description is misleading. This is (AFAICT) not an implementation of a
> standard but a clone product, like wine, and much li
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 07:48:18AM +, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.10.05.1117 +0200]:
> > FWIW this problem is found in many other cases: see lighttpd with
> > apache2 installed, or caudium or any other http daemon, and none
> > of them has a bu
According to the authors of Moonlight [1], this software is covered by patents
owned by Microsoft, which has rules specificaly forbidding re-distribution
to parties that are "Downstream recipients" [2].
This seems to indicate it would be illegal for Debian developers in the US
to:
- Use Moonli
On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 01:07:16PM +0100, Jo Shields wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Jo Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: moon
> Version : 0.8.1
> Upstream Author : Everaldo Canuto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and others
> * URL : http://www
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Mo den 6. Okt 2008 um 8:21 schrieb Franklin PIAT:
> > It's something you may not have power on (if your netadmin or ISP
> > decides to enable IPv6, it's their choice, not yours. You can
> > *disable* it but, it's enabled by default anyway (thanksf
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 12:43:36PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 05:43:24PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > This kernel have a critical problem:
> >
> > | Bad pte = 11764060, process = vsftpd, vm_flags = 100071, vaddr = b7f85000
> > | Pid: 8129, comm: vsftpd Not tainted 2.6
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Soeren Sonnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: coinor-dylp
Version : 1.4.4
Upstream Author : Lou Hafer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : https://projects.coin-or.org/DyLP
* License : CPL
Programming Lang: C
Descriptio
also sprach Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.10.05.1117 +0200]:
> FWIW this problem is found in many other cases: see lighttpd with
> apache2 installed, or caudium or any other http daemon, and none
> of them has a bug about it, it's unfair to mark it as RC.
Uh, don't you think that marki
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Soeren Sonnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: coinor-cbc
Version : 2.2.1
Upstream Author : John J. Forrest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : https://projects.coin-or.org/Cbc
* License : CPL
Programming Lang: C++
Desc
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stefan Jahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: adms
Version : 2.3.0
Upstream Author : Laurent Lemaitre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://mot-adms.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 20:25 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On dim, 2008-10-05 at 16:38 +0200, Franklin PIAT wrote:
> > Feel free to improve or comment them.
>
> Not sure if it's the right place to comment, but I wonder how can
> “Enable Ipv6” be classified as “Medium Risk”.
I wanted to have IP
46 matches
Mail list logo
