Beste webmaster van debian.org,
We hebben een link naar uw website op onze site geplaats omdat deze,
ons inziens, goed aansluit bij de interesse van onze bezoekers.
U kunt uw link terugvinden op:
http://www.toscane-vakantiehuis.nl/LinkPartners.html
(categorie Vakantiehuizen > Toscane)
Als
On dim, 2008-10-05 at 16:38 +0200, Franklin PIAT wrote:
> Feel free to improve or comment them.
Not sure if it's the right place to comment, but I wonder how can
“Enable Ipv6” be classified as “Medium Risk”. It's something you may not
have power on (if your netadmin or ISP decides to enable IPv6,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "André Gaul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libalberta2
Version : 2.0
Upstream Author : Alfred Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kunibert G. Siebert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.alberta-fem.de
* License : GPL
Hi,
first of all, we are a bit unsure about the intended timeline. Do you
plan to remove architectures which fail to release for the next two
releases (i.e. lenny and lenny+1), or will you impose this new policy
retro-actively for the etch and lenny releases, i.e. kill off the ports
on relatively
On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 06:02:17PM +0200, Franklin PIAT wrote:
> The page could have an "Expert" subpage (or let's name it kamikaze, so
> people don't get impressed by the name ;)
Frankly, I'm not sure why to have distributions in there at all.
Clearly, SELinux issues etc. in stable won't get fixe
Hi,
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 21:24 +0530, Kartik Mistry wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I have added note about Experimental.
> >
> > Please also add your email address next to it so that users can get
> > support from you and don't burden the re
Hi Thomas,
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 17:19 +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Hi Franklin,
>
> thanks for working on a page describing the various releases.
>
> I would like to object to your labeling according to "risk".
Actually, when I started the page, the 4 levels were simply tagged "Low
risk" to
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I have added note about Experimental.
>
> Please also add your email address next to it so that users can get
> support from you and don't burden the regular Debian support channels.
I guess it was for DDs who want to test
On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 09:01:34PM +0530, Kartik Mistry wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You'll notice that I've added a DD section. I'm wondering whether it
> > would help to have some recommended features for DDs' machines (like
> > SElinux, if
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You'll notice that I've added a DD section. I'm wondering whether it
> would help to have some recommended features for DDs' machines (like
> SElinux, if we want to have it enable by default in Squeeze, **this is
> an exampl
On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 05:19:09PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> I would like to object to your labeling according to "risk". I don't think
> running unstable or testing is a high risk per se. As long as one doesn't
> upgrade onself into a terrible situation and knows how to downgrade a package,
Hi Franklin,
thanks for working on a page describing the various releases.
I would like to object to your labeling according to "risk". I don't think
running unstable or testing is a high risk per se. As long as one doesn't
upgrade onself into a terrible situation and knows how to downgrade a pac
Hello,
Debian receives quite some feedback from it's users. However some
features that are system-wide probably deserve more attention (like most
of the release goals).
I've written a wiki page[1] which describes four typical scenario to
encourage testers to activate some features (I've thrown so
severity 500176 important
thanks
FWIW this problem is found in many other cases: see lighttpd with
apache2 installed, or caudium or any other http daemon, and none of them
has a bug about it, it's unfair to mark it as RC.
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 09:47:38AM +, martin f krafft wrote:
> reopen 5
14 matches
Mail list logo
