Re: DELAYED queue and upload hostname

2008-09-20 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (21/09/2008): > Will a possibility to "upload" with SSH be added at some moment? Maybe it'd be feasible to teach dput/dupload how to use an @d.o machine as “proxy”, where the files are scp'd to, and from which they're moved to the appropriate place afterwards?

Re: DELAYED queue and upload hostname

2008-09-20 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Julien Cristau ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Some questions: > 1) I use Tollef's DELAYED queue mostly for 0-day because it's accessible > over ssh, so I can rsync files over which is more reliable than ftp on a > bad link. It sounds like you're removing the possibility to use that (I > know I ca

Re: RFC: update-rc.d

2008-09-20 Thread Michael Biebl
Kel Modderman wrote: > Hi all, > > This email describes an extension of update-rc.d to provide an interface > for disabling and reenabling initscript sysvinit runlevel start links. > > It contains a patch that is the last in a series[0] of patches submitted to > the sysvinit team. After speaking

Re: Bug#497304: general: packages cannot be partially installed

2008-09-20 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Tuesday 02 September 2008 16:01:17 schrieb Michelle Konzack: > Am 2008-08-31 19:08:49, schrieb Mark Hobley: > > eg: coreutils depends on coreutils-fileutils and > > coreutils-fileutils depends on coreutils-fileutils-head, > > coreutils-fileutils-split > > This would leed into over 200.000 Binary

Re: Bug#497304: general: packages cannot be partially installed

2008-09-20 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2008-08-31 19:08:49, schrieb Mark Hobley: > eg: coreutils depends on coreutils-fileutils and > coreutils-fileutils depends on coreutils-fileutils-head, > coreutils-fileutils-split This would leed into over 200.000 Binary packages... > It is policy that internationalized (non-english) componen

Re: What should be on a rescue CD ? (was Re: Debian Live Lenny Beta1)

2008-09-20 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2008-08-28 14:41:38, schrieb Mark Allums: > Consider something akin to pico/nano as well. Something very small and > lightweight and easy to use. Something for the "near misses" in the > experience department: someone who is able to install and run Debian > (mostly) but still is a bit green

Re: What should be on a rescue CD ? (was Re: Debian Live Lenny Beta1)

2008-09-20 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello Ian, Is "Midnight Commander" on the Rescue-CD? I have gotten (from the net) some Rescue-CDs laking "mc" which I use daily on any of my systems... > What hex editor(s) should it have ? How important is it to have > python, tcl, ruby or other scripting languages ? Which ONE version > of Em

Re: Bug#195481: closed by Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (upstream issue, not packaging related)

2008-09-20 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Barak, On Saturday 20 September 2008 21:09, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: > What makes Debian a "distribution" rather than just a random > collection of miscellaneous software is integration. This is an > integration wishlist. It has to happen at the distribution level if > it is to happen anyw

RFC: update-rc.d

2008-09-20 Thread Kel Modderman
Hi all, This email describes an extension of update-rc.d to provide an interface for disabling and reenabling initscript sysvinit runlevel start links. It contains a patch that is the last in a series[0] of patches submitted to the sysvinit team. After speaking with Petter Reinholdtsen on irc he

Bug#499635: ITP: libgigi -- GUI library for OpenGL

2008-09-20 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Ansgar Burchardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libgigi Version : 0.7.0 Upstream Author : T. Zachary Laine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://gigi.sourceforge.net/ * License : LGPL-2.1+ Programming Lang: C++ Desc

Re: DELAYED queue and upload hostname

2008-09-20 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 11514 March 1977, Faidon Liambotis wrote: > Joerg Jaspert wrote: >> Only problem is - if someone goes and uploads a NEW package there it >> would get us in trouble, as we would distribute it before it got its >> inspection if we really can do that. So if that ever happens it needs >> some extra

Re: Xen status in lenny?

2008-09-20 Thread Bruno Voigt
Bastian Blank wrote: > Got a response from Novell, including a workaround. > > Next try: http://194.39.182.225/debian/xen/try4. > > Hi Bastian, great stuff! Do you have any idea where I might get the package linux-headers-2.6.26-1-common-xen for amd64 needed by your provided package linux-head

Re: DELAYED queue and upload hostname

2008-09-20 Thread Faidon Liambotis
Joerg Jaspert wrote: > Only problem is - if someone goes and uploads a NEW package there it > would get us in trouble, as we would distribute it before it got its > inspection if we really can do that. So if that ever happens it needs > some extra code to look if its valid to give links or not. Wel

Re: nut package freeze exception request (dependency based boot)

2008-09-20 Thread Kel Modderman
On Sunday 21 September 2008 01:12:34 Anton Martchukov wrote: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:19:15PM +1000, Kel Modderman wrote: > > Is the link just there to be a "virtual/persistent" link to whatever service > > which is installed and provides the functionality? > > Inspection of the nut package lea

Bug#195481: closed by Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (upstream issue, not packaging related)

2008-09-20 Thread Barak A. Pearlmutter
What makes Debian a "distribution" rather than just a random collection of miscellaneous software is integration. This is an integration wishlist. It has to happen at the distribution level if it is to happen anywhere. I don't understand why you want to close this issue---the logic seems to be j

Re: DELAYED queue and upload hostname

2008-09-20 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 11514 March 1977, Julien Cristau wrote: > 1) I use Tollef's DELAYED queue mostly for 0-day because it's accessible > over ssh, so I can rsync files over which is more reliable than ftp on a > bad link. It sounds like you're removing the possibility to use that (I > know I can rsync files to so

Re: DELAYED queue and upload hostname

2008-09-20 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 11514 March 1977, Mike Hommey wrote: >> To untie the upload queue from the archive DSA setup an alias to be used >> for future uploads. Please change your configuration of dput, dupload or >> whatever you use to no longer use ftp-master.debian.org but >> ftp.upload.debian.org instead. > Are def

Re: Headsup: ncurses soname bump 5 to 6

2008-09-20 Thread Neil Williams
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 23:03:25 +0200 Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 13:40:14 -0700, Dan Kegel wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> from the upstream POV, this would be another ABI transition. > > > >

Re: DELAYED queue and upload hostname

2008-09-20 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 18:30:55 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > - the DELAYED queue is back on ftp-master > Some questions: 1) I use Tollef's DELAYED queue mostly for 0-day because it's accessible over ssh, so I can rsync files over which is more reliable than ftp on a bad link. It sounds like y

Re: DELAYED queue and upload hostname

2008-09-20 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 06:30:55PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > ftp.upload.debian.org > - > To untie the upload queue from the archive DSA setup an alias to be used > for future uploads. Please change your configuration of dput, dupload or > whatever you use to no longer use ft

Re: nut package freeze exception request (dependency based boot)

2008-09-20 Thread Anton Martchukov
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 04:23:34PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > Why is the symlink provided? Where is the definition of the > ups-monitor virtual package written down? What is using this symlink? > I assume a good solution should take into account the answers to these > questions. :) I am

Re: nut package freeze exception request (dependency based boot)

2008-09-20 Thread Anton Martchukov
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:19:15PM +1000, Kel Modderman wrote: > Is the link just there to be a "virtual/persistent" link to whatever service > which is installed and provides the functionality? > Inspection of the nut package leads me to believe this may be the case, so > I wrote a patch for insse

Re: [RFC] How should rsyslog handle .0 logfiles from sysklogd

2008-09-20 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 01:20:06AM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote: > Michael Biebl wrote: > > 3.) Delete the .0 files in postinst. Is this covered by the policy? > I think that deleting logfiles without warning is totally unacceptable. Outside of purge at least. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EM

Bug#499606: ITP: tika -- a Java library for extracting textual information from various documents

2008-09-20 Thread Jan-Pascal van Best
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Jan-Pascal van Best" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: tika Version : 0.2-SNAPSHOT Upstream Author : Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and others * URL : http://incubator.apache.org/tika/ * License : Apache 2.0 Progra

Bug#460504: marked as done (dh_desktop/dh_icons madness)

2008-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 20 Sep 2008 12:39:57 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line not a bug has caused the Debian Bug report #460504, regarding dh_desktop/dh_icons madness to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Re: [RFC] How should rsyslog handle .0 logfiles from sysklogd

2008-09-20 Thread Guillem Jover
On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 12:01:57 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Fri,19.Sep.08, 23:57:54, Michael Biebl wrote: > > Afaics I have the following options. > > 1.) Do nothing and simply document this fact in README.Debian, telling > > the admin that he can safely delete this files if he no longer needs

Bug#195481: marked as done (Centralized configuration for location settings?)

2008-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 20 Sep 2008 12:29:39 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line upstream issue, not packaging related has caused the Debian Bug report #195481, regarding Centralized configuration for location settings? to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Re: Xen status in lenny?

2008-09-20 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 05:43:24PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > This kernel have a critical problem: > > | Bad pte = 11764060, process = vsftpd, vm_flags = 100071, vaddr = b7f85000 > | Pid: 8129, comm: vsftpd Not tainted 2.6.26-1-xen-686 #1 > | [] handle_mm_fault+0x61b/0xe78 > | [] mprotect_fix

Re: Headsup: ncurses soname bump 5 to 6

2008-09-20 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On mar, 2008-09-16 at 21:21 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > just a quick note: after lenny, ncurses will bump soname major from 5 > to > 6 in order to make mouse wheels work. The transition will be big, but > can be entirely handled with binNMUs only and this is what this mail > is > about: btw, wr

Can i Trust You? Call me if yes +226 78 03 96 12

2008-09-20 Thread Ahmed Diallo
I have a new email address!You can now email me at: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am Ahmed DIALLO, a staf of Bank Of Africa I want to transfer US$14 Million to your account. - Ahmed Diallo

Re: [RFC] How should rsyslog handle .0 logfiles from sysklogd

2008-09-20 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2008-09-20 11:14 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Andrei Popescu wrote: >> I would have rather suggested NEWS.Debian if apt-listchanges was higher >> priority. Anyway, this should also be documented in the release notes. > > Agreed, mentioning this issue in the release notes would probably be a >

Re: [RFC] How should rsyslog handle .0 logfiles from sysklogd

2008-09-20 Thread Michael Biebl
Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Fri,19.Sep.08, 23:57:54, Michael Biebl wrote: > >> Afaics I have the following options. >> 1.) Do nothing and simply document this fact in README.Debian, telling >> the admin that he can safely delete this files if he no longer needs them. > > I would have rather sugg

Re: [RFC] How should rsyslog handle .0 logfiles from sysklogd

2008-09-20 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Fri,19.Sep.08, 23:57:54, Michael Biebl wrote: > Afaics I have the following options. > 1.) Do nothing and simply document this fact in README.Debian, telling > the admin that he can safely delete this files if he no longer needs them. I would have rather suggested NEWS.Debian if apt-listchan

Re: [RFC] How should rsyslog handle .0 logfiles from sysklogd

2008-09-20 Thread Andreas Metzler
Patrick Schönfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/9/19 Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [...] >> 3.) Delete the .0 files in postinst. Is this covered by the policy? > Not without a backup or asking the user first. You could ask the user > via debconf. I think this is a case, which would justif

Re: [RFC] How should rsyslog handle .0 logfiles from sysklogd

2008-09-20 Thread Andreas Metzler
Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > Unfortunately sysklogd uses a custom log rotate mechanism, > which starts the log rotate cycle at .0 > The default logrotate configuration starts the log rotate cyle at .1. > This leaves .0 files around when you switch from sysklogd to rsyslog [2] >

Re: [RFC] How should rsyslog handle .0 logfiles from sysklogd

2008-09-20 Thread Patrick Schönfeld
Hi, 2008/9/19 Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > rsyslog, in contrast to sysklogd, uses logrotate to rotate the default > log files. Unfortunately sysklogd uses a custom log rotate mechanism, > which starts the log rotate cycle at .0 > The default logrotate configuration starts the log rotate cy