Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2.) Try to log rotate the .0 files for the default Debian log files in
> postinst. I feel a bit uneasy about this approach, for several reasons:
> - It adds fairly reasonable complexity to the maintainer scripts, if you
> want to consider all corner cases.
> E.g. if you swit
Hi,
as rsyslog will be our default syslogd for lenny, I'd like to fix bug
#491672 [1], I'm just undecided about which solution is best.
rsyslog, in contrast to sysklogd, uses logrotate to rotate the default
log files. Unfortunately sysklogd uses a custom log rotate mechanism,
which starts the log
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le jeudi 18 septembre 2008 ? 17:29 -0400, Thomas Dickey a ?crit :
agree - I don't know how to guarantee that five years from now there'd
be no ABI change - the best I can do is maintain API compatibility.
You can maintain ABI compatibility by using
On Friday 19 September 2008 20:31, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > In lenny we have none such packages that I know of. How about we start
> > to make policy when there's a real problem to be solved, and spend our
> > time fixing RC bugs meanwhile?
>
> Uh, I can name several that use that aspect of the GPL
"Thijs Kinkhorst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, September 19, 2008 11:25, Michael Banck wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 01:58:03AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>>> The GPL version 2 permits it to display copyright notices and warranty
>>> disclaimers, without being allowed to patch them
Le jeudi 18 septembre 2008 à 17:29 -0400, Thomas Dickey a écrit :
> agree - I don't know how to guarantee that five years from now there'd
> be no ABI change - the best I can do is maintain API compatibility.
You can maintain ABI compatibility by using opaque structures by using
constructor/getter
On Fri, Sep 19 2008, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> 2008/9/19 Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>>> The GPL version 2 permits it to display copyright notices and warranty
>>> disclaimers, without being allowed to patch them away. This can be made
>>> more obnoxious than one-time click-through EULAs, I f
Thanks to Sune who relayed my noise in his blog, Jesper Dahl Nyerup
and Henrik Christian Grove complete Debian Installer translations for
Danish very quickly and even reviewed the existing translations.
I think they deserve big kudos from Danish native speakers and D-I
developers.
Thanks as well
Hi,
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > Is it still correct that dpkg needs to be upgraded first before doing a
> > dist-upgrade from Etch? With perl-base 5.10.0-14 pre-depending on a
> > fixed version of dpkg, that should not be the case anymore, AFAICS.
>
> I
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kel Modderman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: iw
Upstream Author : Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Documentation/iw
* License : BSD-3
Programming Lang: C
Description : tool
On 2008-09-18 19:19, Robert Lemmen wrote:
> while the EULA topic is already being discussed:
Where is it already discussed? At least not on d-d, as far as I can
see/find...
Thanks,
Johannes
NB: Google finds only some ubuntu discussions for me...
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital si
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 6:43 PM, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This kernel have a critical problem:
>
> | Bad pte = 11764060, process = vsftpd, vm_flags = 100071, vaddr = b7f85000
> | Pid: 8129, comm: vsftpd Not tainted 2.6.26-1-xen-686 #1
> | [] handle_mm_fault+0x61b/0xe78
> | [] mp
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 11:41:57AM +0100, Robert Lemmen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 11:27:44AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > In lenny we have none such packages that I know of. How about we start to
> > make policy when there's a real problem to be solved, and spend ou
about click-through EULAs:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 12:16:17PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > It makes sense. The same way that we're not allowing GFDL packages
> > with invariant sections, we might not want this feature/bug of GPL to
> > be used for that either. I would support making such a dec
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 11:27:44AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> In lenny we have none such packages that I know of. How about we start to
> make policy when there's a real problem to be solved, and spend our time
> fixing RC bugs meanwhile?
of course, but the issue came up because of the mozill
* Miriam Ruiz:
> 2008/9/19 Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>>> The GPL version 2 permits it to display copyright notices and warranty
>>> disclaimers, without being allowed to patch them away. This can be made
>>> more obnoxious than one-time click-through EULAs, I fear.
>>
>> That doesn't m
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 60810 qa.debian.org
Bug#60810: check for packages with the same files
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `qa.debian.org'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administr
2008/9/19 Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> The GPL version 2 permits it to display copyright notices and warranty
>> disclaimers, without being allowed to patch them away. This can be made
>> more obnoxious than one-time click-through EULAs, I fear.
>
> That doesn't mean we should accept tho
On Fri, September 19, 2008 11:25, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 01:58:03AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>> * Robert Lemmen:
>>
>>> still: can we make this a policy item?
>> The GPL version 2 permits it to display copyright notices and warranty
>> disclaimers, without being allow
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 01:58:03AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Robert Lemmen:
> > still: can we make this a policy item?
>
> The GPL version 2 permits it to display copyright notices and warranty
> disclaimers, without being allowed to patch them away. This can be made
> more obnoxious than
20 matches
Mail list logo
