Re: Status of Emdebian {ARM}

2008-07-16 Thread Neil Williams
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 11:57 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 6:23 AM, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Work is ongoing to fold uClibc into Emdebian to reduce installation sizes > > further. > > FYI, uclibc is no longer available in Debian sid/lenny. uClibc will be

Re: Include on first iso: m-a, build essential, kernel headers

2008-07-16 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 17 July 2008, richs wrote: > I can assure you that on an http download i386 iso, m-a is not. > http://atterer.net/jigdo/jigdo-search.php?q=module-assistant+_i386 You really need to check your facts better. If you use the links I provided and just search the pages: http://atterer.net/

Re: Status of Emdebian {ARM}

2008-07-16 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 6:23 AM, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Work is ongoing to fold uClibc into Emdebian to reduce installation sizes > further. FYI, uclibc is no longer available in Debian sid/lenny. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#491139: ITP: audacious2-plugins -- required and optional plugins for Audacious2

2008-07-16 Thread William Pitcock
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: audacious2-plugins Version : 1.9.0+hg20080717 Upstream Author : William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tony Vroon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matti Hamalainen

Bug#491138: ITP: audacious2 -- cross-platform multi-interface audio player

2008-07-16 Thread William Pitcock
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: audacious2 Version : 1.9.0+hg20080717 Upstream Author : William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tony Vroon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matti Hamalainen <[EMAIL

Re: RFC: libprojectM, new upstream version.

2008-07-16 Thread William Pitcock
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 00:57 +0200, Francesco Namuri wrote: > Il giorno mer, 16/07/2008 alle 17.46 -0500, William Pitcock ha scritto: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 22:59 +0200, Francesco Namuri wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I've packaged the new version of this library, the upstream author has > >

Re: RFC: libprojectM, new upstream version.

2008-07-16 Thread Francesco Namuri
Il giorno mer, 16/07/2008 alle 17.46 -0500, William Pitcock ha scritto: > Hi, > > On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 22:59 +0200, Francesco Namuri wrote: > > Hi, > > I've packaged the new version of this library, the upstream author has > > changed the SONAME, and so I've changed the name of the lib and -data

Re: Re: Include on first iso: m-a, build essential, kernel headers

2008-07-16 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 08:21:14PM +, brian m. carlson a écrit : > > Non-free (and contrib) packages are not part of Debian and are therefore > not shipped on Debian CDs or DVDs. I understand your frustration with > not being able to use your wireless card out of the box; I have the same > pr

Re: RFC: libprojectM, new upstream version.

2008-07-16 Thread William Pitcock
Hi, On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 22:59 +0200, Francesco Namuri wrote: > Hi, > I've packaged the new version of this library, the upstream author has > changed the SONAME, and so I've changed the name of the lib and -data > package, not changed the name of the -dev file because the old > maintainer has ch

Re: Re: Re: Include on first iso: m-a, build essential, kernel headers

2008-07-16 Thread richs
Hi Fjp: I am surprised that the dependencies are on the image, as I have always been met with problems trying to install build-essential from the first iso. I will post the output from the terminal on my next fresh install of Lenny and Etch. I can assure you that on an http download i386 is

Re: sysklogd/rsyslog switch

2008-07-16 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Well, it doesn't affect upgrades. And for new installs, _all_ the > packages are new, so this falls under the case of Debian picking one > alternative of something as a default. Well, if Debian defaults change long term users need to know - even for new

RFC: libprojectM, new upstream version.

2008-07-16 Thread Francesco Namuri
Hi, I've packaged the new version of this library, the upstream author has changed the SONAME, and so I've changed the name of the lib and -data package, not changed the name of the -dev file because the old maintainer has chosen to not version the package. This is my first library package, and I'

Re: Re: Include on first iso: m-a, build essential, kernel headers

2008-07-16 Thread Frans Pop
richs wrote: > Hi, basically I am requesting module-assistant, build-essential and the > kernel headers for the default kernel on the first iso. I really don't have a clue what you're going on about then. If you check these pages, you'll see that all three package you name _are_ on the first CD

Re: Re: Include on first iso: m-a, build essential, kernel headers

2008-07-16 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 08:21:14PM +, brian m. carlson wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 09:53:24PM +0200, richs wrote: >> I think that including headers, m-a and build essential would be a good >> move for the developers. Other distros have out-of-the-box non-free >> and proprietary apps/dr

Re: sysklogd/rsyslog switch

2008-07-16 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Jonas Meurer] > I believe that this switch should be documented in the release notes > as well, shouldn't it? Well, it doesn't affect upgrades. And for new installs, _all_ the packages are new, so this falls under the case of Debian picking one alternative of something as a default. I don't kn

Re: Re: Include on first iso: m-a, build essential, kernel headers

2008-07-16 Thread brian m. carlson
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 09:53:24PM +0200, richs wrote: I think that including headers, m-a and build essential would be a good move for the developers. Other distros have out-of-the-box non-free and proprietary apps/drivers/codecs, I would just like to see Debian offer a complete base on tha

Re: ITP: MUMPS -- MUltifrontal Massively Parallel sparse direct Solver

2008-07-16 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/15/08 19:14, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > > Package name: mumps > Version: 4.7.3 > Author: Patrick Amestoy et al. > License: public domain > URL: http://mumps.enseeiht.fr/ > Description: MUltifrontal Massively P

Re: Re: Include on first iso: m-a, build essential, kernel headers

2008-07-16 Thread richs
Hi, basically I am requesting module-assistant, build-essential and the kernel headers for the default kernel on the first iso. These are basic tools that are necessary to be able to install non-free, proprietary packages such as madwifi, nvidia-drivers etc. My main point is the wireless issue

Re: Status of Emdebian {ARM}

2008-07-16 Thread Neil Williams
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 00:45 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008, Neil Williams wrote: > > 1. gtk+2.0 fails to cross-build because the patches now try to build the > > udeb which comes up against a bug in dpkg-cross. I've uploaded the > > new version (including a couple of other bug fix

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?

2008-07-16 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 08:56:24PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 09:44:00PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:26:48PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:53:52PM +0300, Teodor wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?

2008-07-16 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 09:44:00PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:26:48PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:53:52PM +0300, Teodor wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > See

Re: Xen status in lenny?

2008-07-16 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Bastian Blank wrote: > Xen got a often used technique in the last two years. All of the large > distributions got some sort of support for it. Debian Etch have full > support for it. There was several requests of various people so I think > not providing at least a minimal support in Lenny is wrong

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?

2008-07-16 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:26:48PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:53:52PM +0300, Teodor wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > See: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenParavirtOps > > >> > > I think x86-64 xen

Bug#491103: ITP: bzr-stats -- Statistics plugin for Bazaar

2008-07-16 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jelmer Vernooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: bzr-stats Version : 0.0.1 Upstream Author : John Arbash Meinel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jelmer Vernooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * UR

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?

2008-07-16 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:53:52PM +0300, Teodor wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > See: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenParavirtOps > >> > > I think x86-64 xen patches are going in for 2.6.27.. > > > > Lenny will not support 64bit, no

Re: Include on first iso: m-a, build essential, kernel headers

2008-07-16 Thread Leo 'costela' Antunes
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > They are free, do not take up space, but > without them (on a wireless only computer) you hit a vicious circle; > Needing internet to be able to get internet. Avoiding the free vs. non-free firmware issue, most of these packages are available on Debian CDs/DVDs, jus

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?

2008-07-16 Thread Teodor
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > See: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenParavirtOps >> > > I think x86-64 xen patches are going in for 2.6.27.. > > Lenny will not support 64bit, no dom0.. so basicly lenny can only be used as > a 32bit domU .. unl

Re: font policy changes

2008-07-16 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 08:37:12 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Thank you. I can write a proposed addition to the Policy Manual for > TrueType fonts after I'm done with the current package unless someone > else wants to do it. The "update-fonts-dir" utility currently only > handles fonts in t

RE: font policy changes

2008-07-16 Thread unifoundry
> Original Message > Subject: Re: font policy changes > From: Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, July 16, 2008 4:20 am > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > The font caches should be automatically updated as soon as you

Re: sysklogd/rsyslog switch

2008-07-16 Thread Jonas Meurer
On 15/07/2008 Joerg Jaspert wrote: > I just did the requested switch, sysklogd/klogd are now priority extra, > rsyslog (not its -mysql -pgsql packages) are now priority important. > > If something else, like Tasks or so, needs to be changed too: Whoever > needs to do that please do it. Thanks. th

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?

2008-07-16 Thread Samuel Thibault
Gunnar Wolf, le Wed 16 Jul 2008 07:42:37 -0500, a écrit : > > I could live with the I/O slowdown but nothing will make hardware > > magically appear. > > Please explain further on this. Do you mean that xen can run > paravirtualized hosts without the hardware features (i.e. the lesser > CPUs sold

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?

2008-07-16 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Goswin von Brederlow dijo [Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:10:30PM +0200]: >> > I don't think that any of the alternatives are valid candidates yet: >> > - Linux-Vserver, OpenVZ: clearly not the same use case. >> > - Virtualbox, qemu: poor performance under some w

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?

2008-07-16 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 02:11:48PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:11:06AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote: > > > > Without dom0, lenny will be unusable for several installations of mine > > which presently run an ugly combination of etch's dom0 and lenny's > > kernel. I

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?

2008-07-16 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Goswin von Brederlow dijo [Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:10:30PM +0200]: > > I don't think that any of the alternatives are valid candidates yet: > > - Linux-Vserver, OpenVZ: clearly not the same use case. > > - Virtualbox, qemu: poor performance under some workloads. > > Unusable for production work. E

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?

2008-07-16 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:11:06AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote: > On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 12:35 +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:51:21PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:50:22AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > > > On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, B

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?

2008-07-16 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:11:06AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote: > > Without dom0, lenny will be unusable for several installations of mine > which presently run an ugly combination of etch's dom0 and lenny's > kernel. I would like to do that in a different way. > > If we will not see dom0 in lin

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?

2008-07-16 Thread William Pitcock
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 14:11 +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:11:06AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote: > > > > Without dom0, lenny will be unusable for several installations of mine > > which presently run an ugly combination of etch's dom0 and lenny's > > kernel. I would l

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?

2008-07-16 Thread William Pitcock
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 12:35 +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:51:21PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:50:22AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > > On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 05:22:55PM +03

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?

2008-07-16 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 02:23:26PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:57:26AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 12:51 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:50:22AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > > > see relevant posts of Ian C

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?

2008-07-16 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 02:23:26PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > Like said, this thread was started to discuss about possible options of > getting xen dom0 support into lenny, and I pasted that git link to give a > status update of pv_ops work happening atm. current best guess is lenny+half. h

Re: font policy changes

2008-07-16 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 13 juillet 2008 à 21:16 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : > 4) What are the preferred steps for registering a TrueType font in > Debian? It is outside the X11 directory structure, and depends on the > TrueType font server. GNOME recognizes a newly installed TrueType font > but is the

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?

2008-07-16 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:57:26AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 12:51 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:50:22AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > > see relevant posts of Ian Campbell on d-kernel > > > > > > > You mean this?: http://lists.debian.o

[EMAIL PROTECTED] hat Ihnen ein Google Gadget geschickt

2008-07-16 Thread moltechnology
Hallo! Ein Freund von Ihnen hat ein Google Gadget namens " Der Evolutive Schritt, den Krieg zu beenden " erstellt, das er Ihnen gerne über iGoogle, Ihre personalisierte Version der Google-Startseite, zu Verfügung stellen möchte. Möglicherweise nimmt Ihr Freund von einem Tag auf den anderen Ände

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?

2008-07-16 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:35:09PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:51:21PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:50:22AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > > On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 05:22:5

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?

2008-07-16 Thread Ian Campbell
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 12:51 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:50:22AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > see relevant posts of Ian Campbell on d-kernel > > > > You mean this?: http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2008/07/msg00070.html > > I think the situation has chan

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?

2008-07-16 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:51:21PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:50:22AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 05:22:55PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > > > > > > Hopefully Jeremy Fitzharding

Re: Policy restriction to depend on font packages

2008-07-16 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Eugene V. Lyubimkin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > >> Should I mass-file the bugs or this situation can be resolved through >> different approach? > > > While you're technically right, apparently, I think that this issue >

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?

2008-07-16 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:50:22AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 05:22:55PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > > > > Hopefully Jeremy Fitzhardinge (from Xensource) and others can get the > > > important Xen kernel features

Include on first iso: m-a, build essential, kernel headers

2008-07-16 Thread richs
I would like to ask why essential packages are not included on the first Debian download cd/iso. I use Nvidia and Atheros wireless, but the packages module-assistant, build essential, kernel headers, wireless-tools etc, are needed for most other graphic, network driver and firmware installations

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?

2008-07-16 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 05:22:55PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > > Hopefully Jeremy Fitzhardinge (from Xensource) and others can get the > > important Xen kernel features ported to pv_ops framework and integrated > > into vanilla linus kernels soon

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?

2008-07-16 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 03:51:12AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 11:42 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > > > I guess it was faster _now_, but they'll have to live with the forward > > porting pain for years more now.. > > While this is true, the patches still allo

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?

2008-07-16 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 03:40:38AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote: > On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 11:12 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 01:54:50AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 05:22:55PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > > > > > > Hopefully Jeremy Fitz

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?

2008-07-16 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Gunnar Wolf wrote: >> The problem also appears for vserver kernel. > > It is currently in Sid [1], and it has been for some time already. It > seems it will very soon reach Lenny [2] (In case status changes by the > moment you check it: linux-2.6 is going in today (thanks to manual > hinting by lu

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?

2008-07-16 Thread William Pitcock
Hi, On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 11:42 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > I guess it was faster _now_, but they'll have to live with the forward > porting pain for years more now.. While this is true, the patches still allow for Debian to ship Lenny without a feature regression in Xen support. William

Bug#491060: ITP: python-ptrace -- Python bindings for ptrace

2008-07-16 Thread Pierre Chifflier
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pierre Chifflier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: python-ptrace Version : 0.3.1 Upstream Author : Victor Stinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://fusil.hachoir.org/trac/wiki/Ptrace * License : GPLv2 Programming Lang

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?

2008-07-16 Thread William Pitcock
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 11:12 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 01:54:50AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 05:22:55PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > > > > Hopefully Jeremy Fitzhardinge (from Xensource) and others can get the > > > important Xen kernel

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?

2008-07-16 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 01:54:50AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 05:22:55PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > > Hopefully Jeremy Fitzhardinge (from Xensource) and others can get the > > important Xen kernel features ported to pv_ops framework and integrated > > into vanill

Re: Policy restriction to depend on font packages

2008-07-16 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Eugene V. Lyubimkin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Should I mass-file the bugs or this situation can be resolved through > different approach? While you're technically right, apparently, I think that this issue should be solved by a discussion to either adapt the policy wrt current practice (fon