On jeu, 2008-06-26 at 00:28 +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As a solution for "#481189 curl: cannot connect to IPv6 hosts
> anymore" I added a patch to hook curl to c-ares even for ipv6
> lookups. Upstream is very interested in this patch, too.
>
> Could someone with ipv6 connectivity pl
Asitabh softz wants you to join Yaari!
Is Asitabh your friend?
http://yaari.com/?controller=user&action=mailregister&friend=1&sign=YaariNMI858NDU703WTL689USW406";>Yes,
Asitabh is my friend! http://yaari.com/?controller=user&action=mailregister&friend=0&sign=YaariNMI858NDU703WTL689USW406";>No,
A
* Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-26 01:09]:
> On Jun 22, Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Are there plans to enforce files under /etc/udev/rules.d/ being regular
> > files in Debian, as they are in Ubuntu?
>
> Enforce, no. Highly recommend, yes.
Could you please poi
On Jun 22, Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are there plans to enforce files under /etc/udev/rules.d/ being regular
> files in Debian, as they are in Ubuntu?
Enforce, no. Highly recommend, yes.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi!
As a solution for "#481189 curl: cannot connect to IPv6 hosts
anymore" I added a patch to hook curl to c-ares even for ipv6
lookups. Upstream is very interested in this patch, too.
Could someone with ipv6 connectivity please test the curl
packages (version 7.18.2-1e1) in experimental[1] and v
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> ke, 2008-06-25 kello 09:18 +0100, Adam D. Barratt kirjoitti:
>> As "foo=bar" is an argument "more complex than simple variables" and
>> the
>> example explicitly shows the use of local to declare the variable
>> followed by assignment to it, my reading of policy is that "lo
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 08:49:20PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> [Bernd Zeimetz]
> > I'm forwarding this orphaning bug to debian-devel as I hope this rises
> > the chances to find somebody who is willing to take care of ispell.
> > According to http://ficus-www.cs.ucla.edu/geoff/ispell.htm
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 08:49:20PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> Given the limitations of ispell, I would instead urge us all to
> migrate all our packages to use for example hunspell and drop ispell
> completely from the distribution. It would be a lot easier to
> maintain a dictionary i
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Bernd Zeimetz]
> > I'm forwarding this orphaning bug to debian-devel as I hope this rises
> > the chances to find somebody who is willing to take care of ispell.
> > According to http://ficus-www.cs.ucla.edu/geoff/ispell.html the version
> > in Deb
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 08:49:20PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> And it would be a lot easier to check spelling in any language if all
> programs supported a spell checker that supported any language, and
> not only the "simple" ones with a structure similar to English. :)
Even better would
[Bernd Zeimetz]
> I'm forwarding this orphaning bug to debian-devel as I hope this rises
> the chances to find somebody who is willing to take care of ispell.
> According to http://ficus-www.cs.ucla.edu/geoff/ispell.html the version
> in Debian is pretty outdated, also there's a number of bugs to
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/01/msg00089.html
Dear Roberto,
dear list,
I'd like to support this idea (refering to goplay),
but would like to extend your suggestion:
IMO it is compulsary to have screenshots within the Debian web page,
as images tell more than words and nowadays, any
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephane Glondu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: lwt
Version : 1.1.0
Upstream Author : Jerome Vouillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://ocsigen.org/install/lwt
* License : LGPL + exceptions (OpenSSL, OCaml)
Programm
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Xavier Oswald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: lib-graph-readwrite-perl
Version : 2.00
Upstream Author : Neil Bowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~neilb/Graph-ReadWrite-2.00/
* License : GPL/Artist
---THIS IS AN AUTOMATED CONFIRMATION---
Thank you for contacting WAYN Support.
Your email is important to us, and we will attempt to answer you within 24
hours, from 8am til 6pm (GMT) Monday to Friday.
In the meantime you may be able to find uesful help & support from our FAQ
section available
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: markus schnalke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: resize-gd
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : markus schnalke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://prog.marmaro.de/resize-gd
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang: C
Descript
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: r-cran-bitops
Version : 1.0-4
* URL : http://cran.stat.auckland.ac.nz/web/packages/bitops/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: R
Description : GNU R package for bit o
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Xavier Oswald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: lib-graph-writer-graphviz-perl
Version : 0.10
Upstream Author : Kang-min Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/G/GU/GUGOD/Graph-Writer-GraphViz-0.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: r-cran-catools
Version : 1.8
* URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/caTools/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: R
Description : Collection of routines to hel
ke, 2008-06-25 kello 09:18 +0100, Adam D. Barratt kirjoitti:
> As "foo=bar" is an argument "more complex than simple variables" and
> the
> example explicitly shows the use of local to declare the variable followed
> by assignment to it, my reading of policy is that "local foo=bar" is not
> perm
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:08:50AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> testing. This list includes all packages in contrib and non-free, as
> well as the ones that are marked unsupported (for example,
> kfreebsd).
Hi. You mention packages that are marked unsupported: where is that
mark stored?
I'm askin
Peter Samuelson wrote:
> Looks like you just need to wait 4 more days. Lenny isn't frozen yet,
> not for optional packages.
OK, thanks. (I was under the impression that some sort of intervention
was required in order to undo a removal.)
--
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
To clarify: is "local foo=bar" policy-compliant or not?
(If not, *sigh*.)
To the best of my knowledge, no, it's not compliant. The relevant section
reads:
* `local' to create a scoped variable must be supported; however,
`local' may or may not preserve
ke, 2008-06-25 kello 08:47 +0100, Adam D. Barratt kirjoitti:
> Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> [...]
> > The next release of checkbashisms will include a "--posix" flag which
> > will allow the non-POSIX behaviours permitted by policy to be flagged.
> > Currently neither set of "local" checks flags "local
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
The next release of checkbashisms will include a "--posix" flag which
will allow the non-POSIX behaviours permitted by policy to be flagged.
Currently neither set of "local" checks flags "local x, y"; I seem to
remember there being a discussion relating to that syntax
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 13:36 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 07:00:13PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Assuming "not-POSIX-but-supported-by-policy" checkbashisms already has a
> > flag to indicate whether "echo -n" should be flagged for exactly this
> > reason; otherwise it
26 matches
Mail list logo
