عودة منتديات روايتي للعمل من جديد

2008-04-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته عزيزي ابراهيم العماري نفيدك علما بان منتديات روايتي عادت للعمل من جديد بعد توفف اضطراري بسبب عملية صيانة للمنتدى وبامكانكم المشاركه من جديد على نفس الرابط http://www.rewity.com/vb ادارة منتديات روايتي -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subj

Re: Package with optional priority depending on extra packages

2008-04-25 Thread Russ Allbery
Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just a comment on section 2.5 of the Policy: > > For optional, it says: > > optional packages should not conflict with each other. > > However, for extra, it says: > > This contains all packages that conflict with others > with required, import

Re: Package with optional priority depending on extra packages

2008-04-25 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 11:04:54AM -0700, Don Armstrong a écrit : > > Huh? There's no such problem if optional packages conflict. The > primary point in the past of not depending on extra packages from > optional packages was so that the CDs would be ordered, so that > packages on CD #2 wouldn't d

Re: Reviewing http://wiki.debian.org/ArchitectureSpecificsMemo

2008-04-25 Thread Zack Weinberg
I looked at the page: this seems like an appropriate moment to mention something that should be a lot more widely known than it is: sizeof(char) == 1 sizeof(signed char) == 1 sizeof(unsigned char) == 1 Those three equalities are not part of any ABI. They are written into the C standard,

Bug#477973: ITP: pidgin-lastfm -- Last.FM plugin for Pidgin

2008-04-25 Thread Jan Hauke Rahm
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jan Hauke Rahm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA224 * Package name: pidgin-lastfm Version : 0.3 Upstream Author : Dominik George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://sourceforge.net/project/platformd

Re: NMU rules for security fixes (was: DEP1: Clarifying policies and workflows for Non Maintainer Uploads)

2008-04-25 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008, Paul Wise wrote: > I'd prefer the security team did not delay fixes at all by default. > Exceptions for specific maintainers, transitions or other reasons > are fine too of course. For stable and testing, I agree. However, for unstable and experimental the maintainer should be

Re: NMU rules for security fixes (was: DEP1: Clarifying policies and workflows for Non Maintainer Uploads)

2008-04-25 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 12:32 AM, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What about introducing a special case regarding the waiting > period before uploading an NMU for security bugs? There are > often cases in which we already have a patch handy to fix a > security issue but still wait a fe

Bug#477972: ITP: hamster-applet -- Time tracking applet for GNOME

2008-04-25 Thread Tim Retout
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Tim Retout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: hamster-applet Version : 0.2 Upstream Author : Toms Baugis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://projecthamster.wordpress.com/ * License : GPLv3 or later Programming Lang: Pyth

Re: ftpmaster: Archive mails send to sponsors too

2008-04-25 Thread Don Armstrong
On Fri, 25 Apr 2008, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > DM Sponsored upload: Say you have team consisting of a DM and > non-DD. The non-DD makes some changes (puts his name into the > changelog) and the DM signs the upload. The DM should put their name on the changelog of a team maintained package sinc

Re: ftpmaster: Archive mails send to sponsors too

2008-04-25 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:05:23PM +0200, Sebastian Harl wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 02:57:34PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> > What about DMs? They could potentially sponsor an upload too. Or do >> > they have an @d

Re: ftpmaster: Archive mails send to sponsors too

2008-04-25 Thread Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:05:23PM +0200, Sebastian Harl wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 02:57:34PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > What about DMs? They could potentially sponsor an upload too. Or do > > they have an @debian.org address too? > > According to the GR they are not al

Claim Ref. Number: 34V/27N/30H 03NL

2008-04-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__REMOVED__ === Benvenuto in Maxi Mail di Virgilio e Tin.it! [EMAIL PROTECTED] tramite il servizio Maxi Mail ha messo a tua disposizione i seguenti allegati : * loto.txt (0 byte) per prelevarli, fai click sul seguente link che t

Re: ftpmaster: Archive mails send to sponsors too

2008-04-25 Thread Sebastian Harl
Hi, On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 02:57:34PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > What about DMs? They could potentially sponsor an upload too. Or do > they have an @debian.org address too? According to the GR they are not allowed and able to sponsor (or NMU) any uploads. And afaik they do not get a @d

Re: [OT] Need old Packages.gz and Release Files

2008-04-25 Thread Don Armstrong
On Fri, 25 Apr 2008, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Diffs are often quite small. The time needed to establish a > connection is often comparable to the time a diff takes to be > downloaded... So, even with pipelining and all, storing too many > diffs becomes irrelevant. There's also the (non-trivial) overhe

Bug#477699: general: No read permission for /usr/include/GL directory

2008-04-25 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Heikki Orsila (Cc-ing you as I don't know if you're on debian-devel or not; apologies if you are subscribed). | On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 07:28:33AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: | > Could you (Heikki Orsila) please try removing and then installing the | > mesa-common-dev package and see if that

Re: [OT] Need old Packages.gz and Release Files

2008-04-25 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Thomas Weber dijo [Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 09:25:04AM +0200]: > > j> By the way, it would be great if the mirrors kept more than just a > > j> week of Diffs. It seems every time I get back from a trip, I end up > > j> uploading the whole Packages.gz file again. Two weeks worth would be > > j> bett

NMU rules for security fixes (was: DEP1: Clarifying policies and workflows for Non Maintainer Uploads)

2008-04-25 Thread Nico Golde
Hi Bas, * Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-24 23:34]: > We (Bas Wijnen, Lucas Nussbaum) worked on a Debian Enhancement > Proposal[0] on the policies and workflows for Non Maintainer Uploads > (NMUs). > > The main purpose of the proposal is: > * to explicitely allow fixing bugs of severity

Re: Extending the update-rc.d API to change runlevel and disable scripts?

2008-04-25 Thread Russ Allbery
Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I believe we should extend the update-rc.d interface to provide a few > more operations that are commonly needed and commonly done wrong. > > - One operation to modify the runlevel used by a script/service. > > - One operation to disable a script

Re: NMU versioning

2008-04-25 Thread Russ Allbery
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I want a consistent versioning scheme, thus +nmuX for both native and > non-natives packages. > > Consider this a wishlist bug against devscripts. :-) And the Developer's Reference. I do recommend actually filing said wishlist bugs, of course. :)

Bug#477837: ITP: pgsnap -- PostgreSQL report tool

2008-04-25 Thread Pierre Chifflier
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pierre Chifflier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: pgsnap Version : 0.2.0 Upstream Author : Guillaume Lelarge * URL : http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pgsnap * License : BSD Programming Lang: PHP Description : Post

Re: DEP1: Clarifying policies and workflows for Non Maintainer Uploads

2008-04-25 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, thanks for starting an initiative to make NMs more useful and accepted! For now I just have two procedural remarks. On Thursday 24 April 2008 21:42, Bas Wijnen wrote: > [0] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep0/ > [1] http://wiki.debian.org/NmuDep Why isnt the second URL http://dep.debian.net/deps

Re: Reviewing http://wiki.debian.org/ArchitectureSpecificsMemo

2008-04-25 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Cyril Brulebois] > Hi, > > I'm wondering whether the ArchitectureSpecificsMemo[1] wiki page is > (well-)known, and whether its content got reviewed, esp. by porters of > each architecture, who could fix obvious errors or typos, or eventually > add special-cases, exceptions, and the like. > > 1. h

Re: NMU versioning (was: DEP1: Clarifying policies and workflowsfor Non Maintainer Uploads)

2008-04-25 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Raphael Hertzog wrote, Friday, April 25, 2008 3:16 PM On Fri, 25 Apr 2008, James Vega wrote: On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 09:42:59PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote: > This DEP is available on the Debian Wiki[1]. "The version must be the version of the last upload, plus +nmuX, where X is a counter startin

Re: NMU versioning (was: DEP1: Clarifying policies and workflows for Non Maintainer Uploads)

2008-04-25 Thread Raphael Hertzog
(reply-to set to debian-devel only) On Fri, 25 Apr 2008, James Vega wrote: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 09:42:59PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote: > > This DEP is available on the Debian Wiki[1]. > > "The version must be the version of the last upload, plus +nmuX, where X is a > counter starting at 1." >

NMU versioning (was: DEP1: Clarifying policies and workflows for Non Maintainer Uploads)

2008-04-25 Thread James Vega
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 09:42:59PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote: > This DEP is available on the Debian Wiki[1]. "The version must be the version of the last upload, plus +nmuX, where X is a counter starting at 1." The above was added to the DEP to "match dch" but dch only uses that format for native N

Re: [OT] Need old Packages.gz and Release Files

2008-04-25 Thread Eric Cooper
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 04:07:51PM +0800, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > You are asking generically Packages without specifying a mirror. Are > they granted to be identically replicated among all mirrors? Of course > they *probably* are due to how mirroring works, but is it *granted* that > there are

Re: ftpmaster: Archive mails send to sponsors too

2008-04-25 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi > > yesterday night I merged a small patch from Thomas Viehmann into our > archive software which enables it to send a copy of all mails to the > person sponsoring the upload. > > This is in affect for all *future* uploads, not for any package which >

Re: where to find linux-kbuild-2.6.21? s/21/25/g

2008-04-25 Thread Hans-J. Ullrich
Am Freitag, 25. April 2008 schrieb Stephen Gran: > This one time, at band camp, Yaroslav Halchenko said: > > Heh heh -- I am an annoying bastard -- but is there a chance to get > > kbuild for 2.6.25: I am fetching packages > > http://kernel-archive.buildserver.net/debian-kernel but header > > packa

Re: Reviewing http://wiki.debian.org/ArchitectureSpecificsMemo

2008-04-25 Thread brian m. carlson
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 08:12:58AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Hi, I'm wondering whether the ArchitectureSpecificsMemo[1] wiki page is (well-)known, and whether its content got reviewed, esp. by porters of each architecture, who could fix obvious errors or typos, or eventually add special-case

Re: Bug#477732: libgsl0ldbl must conflict with libgsl0

2008-04-25 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 25 April 2008 at 10:45, Julien Cristau wrote: | On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:02:51 +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote: | | > Hi, | > | > I'm adding debian-devel as I would like input from other DD. | > The main question is "Do Debian support partial upgrade between | > etch and lenny ? Or are onl

Re: where to find linux-kbuild-2.6.21? s/21/25/g

2008-04-25 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Yaroslav Halchenko said: > Heh heh -- I am an annoying bastard -- but is there a chance to get > kbuild for 2.6.25: I am fetching packages > http://kernel-archive.buildserver.net/debian-kernel but header > packages rely on kbuild packages and those are missing > > Than

Re: ftpmaster: Archive mails send to sponsors too

2008-04-25 Thread Nico Golde
Hi Joerg, * Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-25 13:16]: > yesterday night I merged a small patch from Thomas Viehmann into our > archive software which enables it to send a copy of all mails to the > person sponsoring the upload. [...] Thanks a lot! Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ww

Re: Bug#477732: libgsl0ldbl must conflict with libgsl0

2008-04-25 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:02:51 +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote: > Hi, > > I'm adding debian-devel as I would like input from other DD. > The main question is "Do Debian support partial upgrade between > etch and lenny ? Or are only full upgrade supported ?" Yes, partial upgrades should work,

Extending the update-rc.d API to change runlevel and disable scripts?

2008-04-25 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
I believe we should extend the update-rc.d interface to provide a few more operations that are commonly needed and commonly done wrong. - One operation to modify the runlevel used by a script/service. - One operation to disable a script and make sure it stay disabled. The first operation will

Re: Bug#477699: general: No read permission for /usr/include/GL directory

2008-04-25 Thread Heikki Orsila
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 07:28:33AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > Could you (Heikki Orsila) please try removing and then installing the > mesa-common-dev package and see if that fixes the problem? Interesting, just doing that fixes the permissions. Thanks! But why did it happen in the first plac

Re: [OT] Need old Packages.gz and Release Files

2008-04-25 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 03:35:57PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote: > I have had an accident on my Debian-Archiv-Server and unfortunatly the > files "Packages.gz", "Packages.bz2", "Sources.gz", "Sources.bz2" and > "Release" from the directories Neat project. I'm jumping into it with a question

Re: Bug#477732: libgsl0ldbl must conflict with libgsl0

2008-04-25 Thread Vincent Danjean
Hi, I'm adding debian-devel as I would like input from other DD. The main question is "Do Debian support partial upgrade between etch and lenny ? Or are only full upgrade supported ?" Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > severity 477732 wishlist > tag 477732 + moreinfo > thanks > > On 24 April 2008 at

Re: [OT] Need old Packages.gz and Release Files

2008-04-25 Thread Thomas Weber
Am Freitag, den 25.04.2008, 13:16 +0700 schrieb Mikhail Gusarov: > Twas brillig at 10:56:18 25.04.2008 UTC+08 when [EMAIL PROTECTED] did gyre > and gimble: > > j> By the way, it would be great if the mirrors kept more than just a > j> week of Diffs. It seems every time I get back from a trip, I