The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 421 (new: 7)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 100 (new: 3)
Total number of packages request
Package: wnpp
Owner: "Robert S. Edmonds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: python-pefile
Version : 1.2.9.1
Upstream Author : Ero Carrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/pefile/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 10:25:54AM +0700, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
> Gentlemen,
>
> I'm going to package tool called Sphinx (http://sphinx.pocoo.org/) -
> documentation generator for Python projects.
>
> In ITP (#474782) I chose package name to be 'python-sphinx', however
> then the package will be
Gentlemen,
I'm going to package tool called Sphinx (http://sphinx.pocoo.org/) -
documentation generator for Python projects.
In ITP (#474782) I chose package name to be 'python-sphinx', however
then the package will be thought as containing just python modules.
Is it ok to go ahead and use such
Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> #! /bin/sh
>
> /etc/init.d/$1 $2
>
> there you go with your /sbin/service script.
/sbin/service on Red Hat also sanitizes the environment, which I've found
very useful on occasion. (And does so slightly more intelligently than
env -, I think.)
--
Russ
Le Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:02:07PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
>
> Yesterday Joerg told us to go ahead with the dpkg upload as he
> planned to fix dak in the evening. He did so but his patch is not yet
> applied live on ftp-master... we're waiting for a full ftpmaster to
> apply his patch.
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dominic Hargreaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: liblucene-queryparser-perl
Version : 1.04
Upstream Author : Simon Cozens
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Lucene-QueryParser/
* License : Dual GPL/Artistic
Progra
On 10/04/2008, Carlo Wood wrote:
> It was added 16 March, that is 3+ weeks ago! :/
> So, debian-devel@lists.debian.org: can someone tell me why
> libcwd was added as amd64 package, but still doesn't exist
> as x86 package please?
Because there are additional requirements for non-free packages to b
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:44:50 +0200
Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It was added 16 March, that is 3+ weeks ago! :/
> So, debian-devel@lists.debian.org: can someone tell me why
> libcwd was added as amd64 package, but still doesn't exist
> as x86 package please?
Because it is non-free?
--
It was added 16 March, that is 3+ weeks ago! :/
So, debian-devel@lists.debian.org: can someone tell me why
libcwd was added as amd64 package, but still doesn't exist
as x86 package please?
taryn:~>uname -a
Linux taryn 2.6.22-1-686 #1 SMP Sun Jul 29 14:37:42 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux
taryn:~>apt-cach
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 10. April 2008 schrieb Michael Biebl:
>> What's the advantage over exisiting tools like sysv-rc-conf?
>
> 1. chkconfig works solely on the command line.
sysv-rc-conf has both a command line interface and a ncurses based
interface.
I don't see, why command-
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > An /sbin/service compatibility script would be useful too.
>
> #! /bin/sh
>
> /etc/init.d/$1 $2
>
> there you go with your /sbin/service script.
Close.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSC
On 2008-04-10, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > relieve system administrators of some of the drudgery of manually editing
>> the
>> > symbolic links.
>>
>> What's the advantage over exisiting tools like sysv-
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > relieve system administrators of some of the drudgery of manually editing
> the
> > symbolic links.
>
> What's the advantage over exisiting tools like sysv-rc-conf?
Compatibility with the brains of people who have m
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:31:36AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 30-Mar-08, 15:25 (CDT), Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > dpkg in experimental supports triggers now, and in many cases trigger
> > support can be added to packages without creating a hard dependency on
> > a new version
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: chkconfig
> Version : 10.3-90
> Upstream Author : Michael Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * License : GPL
> Programming Lang: Perl
> Descriptio
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: chkconfig
Version : 10.3-90
Upstream Author : Michael Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : system tool to enable or disable sys
Hi,
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I made an upload this afternoon that was silently dropped.
> (
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/2008-April/001432.html
> )
>
> After randomly checking some debian-devel-changes emails, it seems that
> the accepted p
Am Donnerstag, den 10.04.2008, 18:02 +0900 schrieb Charles Plessy:
> Dear all,
>
> I made an upload this afternoon that was silently dropped.
> (
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/2008-April/001432.html
> )
>
> After randomly checking some debian-devel-changes emai
Dear all,
I made an upload this afternoon that was silently dropped.
(
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/2008-April/001432.html
)
After randomly checking some debian-devel-changes emails, it seems that
the accepted packages do not have the latest Sha checksums introd
Hello Lennart,
Am 2008-04-04 12:44:38, schrieb Lennart Sorensen:
> Certainly archive.debian.org would have the last version of each release
> (so 2.2r5, 3.0r6, etc).
Thank you for this hint...
> The CDs would have had seperate (and different) Packages.gz since there
> would be one on each CD cov
21 matches
Mail list logo
