This one time, at band camp, Simon Richter said:
> Hi,
>
> > > The foo package's build dependencies are only relevant when building the
> > > foo package. For someone who develops software based on libbar, it is
> > > not obvious that foo's build dependencies are required.
>
> > Except that a -de
Hi,
> > The foo package's build dependencies are only relevant when building the
> > foo package. For someone who develops software based on libbar, it is
> > not obvious that foo's build dependencies are required.
> Except that a -dev package can be perfectly functional without
> pkg-config. So
package: gpart
severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
debian-devel@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: patch for gpart to support Windows XP NTFS
Date: Friday 04 April 2008 16:33
From: "Trace Green" <[EMAIL PROT
Newsletter
Make
us an offer on Ebay.
On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 12:38:34AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Consider there's a package foo which is built against libbar-dev and
> > uses pkg-config to obtain the necessary CFLAGS and LIBS for libbar.
>
> > Now is it the foo package's or the libbar-dev package's duty to provide
> >
Hi,
> Consider there's a package foo which is built against libbar-dev and
> uses pkg-config to obtain the necessary CFLAGS and LIBS for libbar.
> Now is it the foo package's or the libbar-dev package's duty to provide
> the dependency on pkg-config?
Disagreeing with the others: It is the -dev p
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stefan Ott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: pidgin-privacy-please
Version : 0.4.1
Upstream Author : Stefan Ott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/pidgin-privacy-please/
* License : GPL
Programming L
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: semantik
Version : 0.6.4
Upstream Author : Thomas Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://freehackers.org/~tnagy/semantik.html
* License : QPL
Programming Lang: C++, Q
On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 01:41:06PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> * Package name: libdevel-profile-perl
> Description : tell me why my perl program runs so slowly
>
> The Devel::Profile package is a Perl code profiler. This will collect
> information on the execution time of a Pe
On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 09:29:33PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 01:41:06PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>
> > * Package name: libdevel-profile-perl
> > Description : tell me why my perl program runs so slowly
> >
> > The Devel::Profile package is a Perl code pr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: libdevel-profile-perl
Version : 1.05
Upstream Author : Jeff Weisberg - http://www.tcp4me.com/
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.20
> reassign 304508 gnome
Bug#304508: Gnome + realplayer10 problem
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `gnome'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.20
> reassign 275635 kernel
Bug#275635: How to increase the Threads Size in debian...
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `kernel'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Ple
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.20
> reassign 453105 gnome
Bug#453105: general: Gnome + Sound problem
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `gnome'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.20
> reassign 422657 nm.debian.org
Bug#422657: Can't advocate a New Maintainer
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `nm.debian.org'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Plea
Martin Schr?der wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to create a package that will when installed automatically
> replace all TeX packages on the system with our version of TeX.
> Unfortunately (in this case) the debian TeX system consists of more
> than 10 packages so a naive approach via Conflicts/Replaces
Your message dated Fri, 4 Apr 2008 19:00:38 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#221489: general: mouse not working properly after
yesterday testing upgrade
has caused the Debian Bug report #221489,
regarding general: mouse not working properly after yesterday testin
Your message dated Fri, 4 Apr 2008 18:59:29 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#216395: general: qt applicatons don't use kde style
has caused the Debian Bug report #216395,
regarding general: qt applicatons don't use kde style
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Fri, 4 Apr 2008 18:51:46 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#242950: Please update libtool for GNU/k*BSD port.
has caused the Debian Bug report #242950,
regarding Please update libtool for GNU/k*BSD port.
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.20
> reassign 402443 gnome
Bug#402443: general: GNOME file box does not show hidden files
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `gnome'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
P
Your message dated Fri, 4 Apr 2008 18:47:41 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#221386: general: addresses for "section coordinators"
has caused the Debian Bug report #221386,
regarding general: addresses for "section coordinators"
to be marked as done.
This means t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.20
> reassign 220289 ftp.debian.org
Bug#220289: general: make a new section: gis, for Geographic Information System
packages
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `ftp.debian.org'.
>
On Fri April 4 2008 02:54:16 Holger Levsen wrote:
> http://layer-acht.org/debian/xorg-etch-backports/
The people who create supplemental archives are much
appreciated. Nevertheless, one wonders if there is
anything that could be done to make them unnecessary.
For example, our Debian installation
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 03:35:57PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> I have had an accident on my Debian-Archiv-Server and unfortunatly the
> files "Packages.gz", "Packages.bz2", "Sources.gz", "Sources.bz2" and
> "Release" from the directories
>
> /debian/dists/${RELEASE}/main/binary-${AR
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: tagua
Version : 1.0~alpha2
Upstream Author : Paolo Capriotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and others
* URL : http://tagua-project.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++, lua
D
Hi.
This is a call for help. I'd like to reduce the number of packages
I am responsible for to hopefully improve the overall quality as a result.
If any DD is willing to help the debian accessibility effort, please
consider taking over one of the following packages: flite, screader, yasr.
eflit
Hello, I hacked gpart, and now gpart v0.1a just support NTFS NT/2000
filesystem, If you use Windows XP, you can not use gpart to try to repair
ntfs filesystem. The patch is very simple, and i have tested Windows XP
profressional with service pack 2. please test the patch in attachment.
diff -Nur ol
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 02/04/08 at 01:52 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 10:24:43AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
So of course besides OOo on there we also find the kernel packages. We
wouldn't have to use lzma for the kernels though, if that would raise the
>>
Hi,
I'm trying to create a package that will when installed automatically
replace all TeX packages on the system with our version of TeX.
Unfortunately (in this case) the debian TeX system consists of more
than 10 packages so a naive approach via Conflicts/Replaces fails
because the package can not
Hello,
I have had an accident on my Debian-Archiv-Server and unfortunatly the
files "Packages.gz", "Packages.bz2", "Sources.gz", "Sources.bz2" and
"Release" from the directories
/debian/dists/${RELEASE}/main/binary-${ARCH}/
/debian/dists/${RELEASE}/main/sources/
/debian/dists/${
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: compiz-switch
Version: 0.2
Upstream Author: Nick Bauermeister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL: http://forlong.blogage.de/article/pages/Compiz-Swi
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 03:35:21PM -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
> On Thu April 3 2008 14:38:14 Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> >
> > http://wiki.debian.org/EtchAndAHalf will solve that soon.
>
> Now that linux-image 2.6.24 has migrated from sid to lenny and will
> be included in EtchAndAHalf that helps a l
On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 12:22:05PM +0200, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> As said - I'm not responsible for the webserver setup of other people.
> Sure, I can put it inside the README and close this bug - waiting
> until the next one comes around and urges me to do something about it
> again. Ah wait, I c
Am Freitag, 4. April 2008 11:50:42 schrieb Holger Levsen:
> Hi,
>
> On Friday 04 April 2008 09:18, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> > to virtually any kind of web application accessing some kind of
> > database/ldap passwords somewhere in the filesystem.
>
> I dont consider a web application which is used
Hi,
On Friday 04 April 2008 00:35, Mike Bird wrote:
> for sid's xserver-xorg.* 7.3 which has not yet made it to lenny,
http://layer-acht.org/debian/xorg-etch-backports/
regards,
Holger
P.S.: If you wonder why there are no backports on bpo, please provide them.
pgp1ZSidIna9I.pgp
Desc
Hi,
On Friday 04 April 2008 09:18, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> to virtually any kind of web application accessing some kind of
> database/ldap passwords somewhere in the filesystem.
I dont consider a web application which is used to configure the LDAP database
and FAI configuration (to install and
Cajus Pollmeier, 2008-04-04 09:18:37 +0200 :
> Hi,
>
> my position to this bug is written down in the bugtracker and I
> don't consider this a bug. Any opinions about what to do with it? It
> would apply to virtually any kind of web application accessing some
> kind of database/ldap passwords some
Hi,
my position to this bug is written down in the bugtracker and I don't consider
this a bug. Any opinions about what to do with it? It would apply to
virtually any kind of web application accessing some kind of database/ldap
passwords somewhere in the filesystem.
This is a simulated problem
38 matches
Mail list logo
