On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 05:48:57PM +, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 10:16:52AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 06:16:33AM +, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > I finally got some time to run some benchmarks. I checked the results[1]
> > > into the "hardening" svn
On Wed March 5 2008 14:52:04 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Mar 2008, Mike Bird wrote:
> > Please post the URL for this policy. I apologize if you've already
> > posted and I missed it, but Google couldn't find it for me.
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Dpkg/GitUsage
Hi Raphael,
I had alre
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008, Mike Bird wrote:
> Please post the URL for this policy. I apologize if you've already
> posted and I missed it, but Google couldn't find it for me.
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Dpkg/GitUsage
Now I would appreciate if you could stop spreading lies and aggressive
remarks in th
On Wed March 5 2008 13:30:06 Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Mike Bird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed March 5 2008 12:29:08 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> >> I've been added to dpkg's Uploader a few weeks ago, I'm not dpkg's main
> >> coordinator. I have no veto power, I was mainly trying to give my vie
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008, Mike Hommey wrote:
> ... and in a "do what i say, not what i do" fashion, the default sa-exim
> setup (at least in etch) leads to receiving bounce notification because
> of spam being rejected.
What *is* valid in the context of this thread is the following policy:
IF the r
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 01:29:01AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > Just for future reference, it'd probably be better to run more than 5
> > tests of each population in the future
>
> Getting larger data sets will be rather time-consuming -- especially
> for
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008, Mike Bird wrote:
> May I suggest then that if no dpkg maintainer objects here
> within 48 hours that Ian should proceed with his update?
May you stop in the next hour giving executive advice when you're not
representing anybody whatsoever?
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCR
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Torin Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: rain8net
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : Torin Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://rain8net.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPLv3
Programming Lang: (C, C++, C#, Perl, P
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 03:49:30PM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Better bounce handling
> ~~
> We checked our bounce handling because we have more than 500 bounces
> for some lists, and in the process found that we didn't have working
> bounce handling for other lists (other-*
Mike Bird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed March 5 2008 12:29:08 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> I've been added to dpkg's Uploader a few weeks ago, I'm not dpkg's main
>> coordinator. I have no veto power, I was mainly trying to give my view
>> of the situation ...
>
> May I suggest then that if no
On Wed March 5 2008 12:29:08 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I've been added to dpkg's Uploader a few weeks ago, I'm not dpkg's main
> coordinator. I have no veto power, I was mainly trying to give my view
> of the situation ...
May I suggest then that if no dpkg maintainer objects here
within 48 hours t
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > What's the difference, really? Isn't it a case of people on all sides
> > trying to control each other instead of cooperating?
>
> What would you like me to do ?
Either do the supplementary work or wait patiently with some _friendly_
nagging from time t
Clint Adams writes ("Re: git bikeshedding (Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg
maintenance)"):
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 12:55:00AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > Isn't this going way out of proportion? That's the first I hear from any
> > *refuses* to merge, as opposed to "the merge no
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes ("Re: git bikeshedding (Re: triggers in
dpkg, and dpkg maintenance)"):
> On Tue, 04 Mar 2008, Mike Bird wrote:
> > Raphael seems to have the power to block your packages but he has
> > no rational excuse. Can the tech committee overrule Raphael or
> > does Debia
While these benchmarks should show any differences in raw processing
performance, there's also the question of what differences the hardening
measures make to application start-up times. PIE in particular should cause
some slowdown when the executables are first run, but it would take some
oth
Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Definitely. I'll upload a new revision removing this gratuitous
> difference and leave a note to make clear it's appropriate to sync the
> package.
Thank you very much to both you and Steve. If this happens again, I'll
mail the Ubuntu maintainer add
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 09:55:37AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
>>> t.test(x=c(10.87,10.873,10.854,10.809,10.877),y=c(10.807,10.824,10.963,10.84,10.838))
> What tool is this you're using?
GNU R. Takes a while to get into, but hard to beat for statistics.
>> data: c(10.87, 10.873, 10.854, 10.809, 10.8
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 01:29:01AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> Just for future reference, it'd probably be better to run more than 5
> tests of each population in the future, as 5 tests means you'll only
> detect very large differences in performance at any reasonable level
> of signifigance.
I
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 10:16:52AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 06:16:33AM +, Kees Cook wrote:
> > I finally got some time to run some benchmarks. I checked the results[1]
> > into the "hardening" svn tree, in case other people want to contribute
> > more stuff.
>
>
On Wednesday 05 March 2008 03:44, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Russ,
>
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 11:26:02PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Does anyone know the right contact point to ask Ubuntu to stop making
> > pointless changes to a Debian package? See:
> >
> > http://patches.ubuntu.com/x/xfo
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 12:55:00AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Isn't this going way out of proportion? That's the first I hear from any
> *refuses* to merge, as opposed to "the merge not going to be done the way I
> would like it to happen", and "it is taking too long for it to get
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Philippe Normand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The Elisa project is now shipped in various upstream source
distributions. The -bad plugins set contains Elisa plugins known to be
working well but with code needing more QA (unittests, code
reviews). Moreover the plugins
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Philippe Normand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The Elisa project is now shipped in various upstream source
distributions. The -bad plugins set contains Elisa plugins known to
be working well but with code needing more QA (unittests, code reviews).
* Package name:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Pietro Abate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ocamlduce
Version : 3.10.0
Upstream Author : Alain Frisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://cduce.org/ocaml.html
* License : LGPL, QPL
Programming Lang: OCaml
Descript
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Philippe Normand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The Elisa project is now shipped in various upstream source
distributions. The -good plugins set contains Elisa plugins known to
be well tested, working and being compatible with the Elisa licensing
model.
* Package name
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008, Kees Cook wrote:
> mplayer doesn't compile with PIE due to the various ASM routines. (I've
> noted this failure mode in the wiki[2] now.) However, with everything
> else enabled (including FORTIFY_SOURCE), there was no measurable
> difference (it was below the percentage diff
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 06:16:33AM +, Kees Cook wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I finally got some time to run some benchmarks. I checked the results[1]
> into the "hardening" svn tree, in case other people want to contribute
> more stuff.
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 08:46:55PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wr
Hi Russ,
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 11:26:02PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Does anyone know the right contact point to ask Ubuntu to stop making
> pointless changes to a Debian package? See:
> http://patches.ubuntu.com/x/xfonts-jmk/xfonts-jmk_3.0-16ubuntu1.patch
> I mailed the person listed i
28 matches
Mail list logo
