On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 08:13:02AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:07:07PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > > * New upstream version notifications
> > > Since yesterday DEHS started sending notifications to the 'summary'
>
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 21:52 +0100, Jiří Paleček wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was looking at the swfdec0.6 package and wondered why it is unavailable
> on almost all architecture.
It only exists in experimental - packages in experimental *might* be
autobuilt but the only way to be sure is to get the pa
Hello,
I was looking at the swfdec0.6 package and wondered why it is unavailable
on almost all architecture. So I looked at the build logs and they
(almost) fail in a quite strange way. It seems apt installed a broken set
of packages (even though a package set satisfying the build-dependenc
I'm looking at fixing a bug on one of my packages:
http://www.debian.org/News/2008/20080229
... the binary in question isn't being built because it wants to use
dbopen(3).We seem to have a manpage for dbopen(3) but no library
that provides it. Is the only option to port the code to the
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 15:01:13 +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> Just for the record: every single package Rafael itp'd is already in
> the archive as part of octave2.1-forge. Upstream decided to split this
> up, so we follow.
>
If the software is already packaged, then it doesn't need an ITP bug
i
Quoting Bas Zoetekouw ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Of those, perl is a false positive (caused by lintian not detecting the
> correct changelog file), the radius bugs are pending, gkrelmms is
> removed from the archive, and gmanedit is in the process of being
> adopted (but I will NMU it if necessary).
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Xavier Guimard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libregexp-assemble-perl
Version : 0.32
Upstream Author : David Landgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~dland/Regexp-Assemble-0.32/
* License : GPL an
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> unblock 453954 by 453966
Bug#453966: xmms-arts: debian/changelog should be utf8
Bug#453954: general: Lenny release goal: UTF-8 debian/changelog and
debian/control
Was blocked by: 242690 338837 338838 356825 451080 453960 453961 453962 453963
453964 45
Amaya wrote:
> * gmanedit: upload with a new maintainer, hopefully fixing other bugs too by
> Anibal Alvelar
> * unblock of #453954 by #453966, #453982, #453991, #454016, #454027, #454016
> (Amaya, about to).
Sorry, #453982 should not be marked un-blocking, as gmanedit
Hey!
Thanks for the status update.
Russ Allbery wrote:
> There are four source packages left with changelog encoding problems:
>
> http://lintian.debian.org/reports/tags/debian-changelog-file-uses-obsolete-national-encoding.html
>
> There are no remaining packages with control encoding problems
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request assistance with maintaining the spamassassin package. I've
been fairly slow to respond to bug reports and packaging issues, and I
don't forsee this getting any better in the forseeable future.
The Debian packaging efforts are coordinated in the collab-main
11 matches
Mail list logo
