Quoting Jan Hauke Rahm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Jan Hauke Rahm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: squirrelmail-compatibility
> Version : 2.0.9
> Upstream Author : Paul Lesniewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.squ
Julian Andres Klode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Currently, we have Architecture to specify supported Architectures.
>
> The problem are packages containing arch-indep content, but are only useful
> on specific architectures (e.g. ndisgtk on i386 and amd64) and/or need
> dependencies only availab
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> William Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I want to manage the config files for several other packages centrally
>> in one package that I'm going to maintain. According to the package
>> maintainers guide, section 7.5.1 [1] , this is entirely possi
Hi,
I would like to request comments if the arbortext-catalog and xt-catalog
[1] packages can be removed from the archives.
They have no reverse dependencies, do not occur in any build
dependencies, have only a few users [2], no active upstream and IMO
libxml-commons-resolver1.1-java offers the s
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 09:50:20AM +, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> Neither did I. I just thought that it could have some features that make
> it so much better then dpatch, which could actually make up the reason why
> everybody is crying "damn dpatch, glorify quilt". So now everybody says
> tha
> Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>libtool
Libtool is a false positive. The script /usr/bin/libtool contains some
C program text embedded in a here document.
I should further note that the Libtool version in experimental makes
use of some bashisms as optimization. These are put in place iff
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jan Hauke Rahm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: squirrelmail-spam-buttons
Version : 2.1
Upstream Author : Paul Lesniewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.squirrelmail.org/plugin_view.php?id=242
* License : GPL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jan Hauke Rahm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: squirrelmail-compatibility
Version : 2.0.9
Upstream Author : Paul Lesniewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.squirrelmail.org/plugin_view.php?id=152
* License : GPL
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, David Paleino wrote:
for those who might not have noticed the mail on debian-devel-announce
is attached below.
I shall subscribe to that list :)
Definitely. If you are a DD it is the only list you are expected
to be subscribed.
I hope someone will do a detailed report
Hi,
As the original maintainer Carlos Z.F. Liu have been MIA for several
months (we have pinged him several times recently, and his latest
upload was 2006-07). xfonts-wqy is a quite important package for
people who use Chinese fonts in Debian. In addition, as per discussion
before seems nobody is
"Cai Qian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> As the original maintainer Carlos Z.F. Liu have been MIA for several
> months (we have pinged him several times recently, and his latest
> upload was 2006-07). xfonts-wqy is a quite important package for
> people who use Chinese fonts in Debian. In
[please CC me on replies]
-=| Sven Mueller, Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 11:07:00PM +0100 |=-
> gregor herrmann schrieb:
> > On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:09:28 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >
> >> Is there any easy conversion from dpatch to quilt for a given package
> >> that is using dpatch?
> >
> > http:/
Hi Matt,
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 11:25:19AM +, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> I'd have said that it would be more sensible to define a reasonable subset
> of quilt features. A set of patches with comments at the top and a
yes, this sounds reasonable. But I'm not a quilt user and therefore
don't kno
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 11:42:16AM +, Ben Finney wrote:
> Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:12:00AM +, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > Why should I bring my feature branches into a patch system, when
> > > there is no need to? As far as th
14 matches
Mail list logo
