Quoting Philippe Cloutier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>>
>> Could we consider increasign the priority of apt-listchanges so that
>> it is installed by default?
> I'm against making it standard, because currently tasksel doesn't ask if a
> recommendation should be installed, so when we make tasksel instal
I copy-pasted addresses a little too quickly. Sorry for the spam; I realized
my mistake and already put in my request at the proper address.
- Paul Goins
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 01:06:58AM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
> Anyway, I'll put the program where I think it fits, and it will be in
> accordance to packaging rules.
Sorry you don't like our feedback, but this is the reason why ITPs are
posted to debian-devel.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mi, 19 Dez 2007, Norbert Preining wrote:
>> What is the best way to create such a list? I cannot install *all*
> No need to answer, I did run some scripts on the mirror on merkel.
For those who are curious about these sorts of searches, don't for
Hi,
On Thu, 20.12.2007 at 00:06:55 +0100, sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the FHS (and debian by extension) doesn't provide support for /usr/libexec.
> in every case i know of, contents of what would otherwise have gone
> in /usr/libexec go in /usr/lib/package/ instead.
but this is
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : MUCkl
Version: 0.4.3
Upstream Author: Stefan Strigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Florian Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL: http://zeank.in-berlin.de/muckl/
* License: GPL2
Description: A Web Based
On Wednesday 19 December 2007 11:05:47 pm Toni Mueller wrote:
> For such programs, there exists /usr/libexec on some systems, but not
> in Linux as far as I know.
the FHS (and debian by extension) doesn't provide support for /usr/libexec.
in every case i know of, contents of what would otherwis
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 11:05:47PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
> On Thu, 20.12.2007 at 08:50:39 +1100, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > In that case, you could call the package funkload-tcpwatch?
> > Perhaps even install the binaries in /usr/lib for use by funkload only?
>
> it is o
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 04:07:14PM -0500, Philippe Cloutier wrote:
> >
> >Could we consider increasign the priority of apt-listchanges so that
> >it is installed by default?
> I'm against making it standard, because currently tasksel doesn't ask if
> a recommendation should be installed, so when w
Hi,
On Thu, 20.12.2007 at 08:50:39 +1100, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In that case, you could call the package funkload-tcpwatch?
> Perhaps even install the binaries in /usr/lib for use by funkload only?
it is only one "binary", and in fact, I already thought about that, but
I'm
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 10:01:54PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
> On Wed, 19.12.2007 at 18:23:19 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We have *real* tcp stream/flow watchers and recorders in Debian already.
> > Also, ethereal/wireshark can postprocess and analyze http
Hi,
On Wed, 19.12.2007 at 18:23:19 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, personally, I'd rather not have such a thing in Debian with that name.
> And the fact that upstream called it that way doesn't speak highly of the
> tool, either IMHO.
well, the latest relea
Could we consider increasign the priority of apt-listchanges so that
it is installed by default?
I'm against making it standard, because currently tasksel doesn't ask if
a recommendation should be installed, so when we make tasksel install
recommendations by default, apt-listchanges would bring
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > A few things: why is it called "tcpwatch" when it only watches HTTP
> > requests? A better name would be "httpwatch".
>
> it's named that way by upstream. I want to keep confusion to a minimum
Well, personally, I'd rather not have such a thing in Debia
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 07:25:35PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
However, since unaligned accesses often cause bus errors, too, my guess
is that it's quite a bit more likely for a SIGBUS to be caused by
programmer error than a corrupted binary...
Yes, but i386 and amd64 don't require aligned ac
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 08:07:59PM +0100, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> I saw you closed the bug - I however wanted to point to debsums. As
> mentioned, SIBGUSes can be caused by corrupted binaries;
Much can be caused by corrupted binaries: when a binary is corrupt, then
segfaults, bus errors, and s
On Mi, 19 Dez 2007, Norbert Preining wrote:
> What is the best way to create such a list? I cannot install *all*
No need to answer, I did run some scripts on the mirror on merkel.
Thanks.
Best wishes
Norbert
---
Dr. Nor
Dear all!
Can we somehow organize that the poppler transition can be done in a
reasonable time frame? There now quite a lot of packages waiting to
enter testing but are all blocked by poppler.
Currently the problematic packages are (from bjorn.haxx.se):
. gimp
uploaded yesterday, needs ag
Hello Norbert,
2007/12/19, Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi all!
>
> In the process of merging dpkg install-info and GNU install-info we are
> now at the point that I would like to generate a list of packages
> using install-info together with the way HOW they call it. Options would
> be
Hi all!
In the process of merging dpkg install-info and GNU install-info we are
now at the point that I would like to generate a list of packages
using install-info together with the way HOW they call it. Options would
be
- via dh_installinfo generated code
- via manual code: which arguments
What
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 08:34:23AM +, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Steve Langasek commented while closing this bug report:
> > > It is recommended that you use apt-listchanges on your system, to be
> > > notified of package behavior changes such as th
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 06:19:41AM +, Christian Perrier wrote:
> From Bug#456977:
>
> Steve Langasek commented while closing this bug report:
>
> >
> > It is recommended that you use apt-listchanges on your system, to be
> > notified of package behavior changes such as this.
>
>
> Could w
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Steve Langasek commented while closing this bug report:
> > It is recommended that you use apt-listchanges on your system, to be
> > notified of package behavior changes such as this.
>
> Could we consider increasign the priority of apt-listchanges s
23 matches
Mail list logo
