Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: supercat
Version : 0.5.3
Upstream Author : Thomas Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://supercat.nosredna.net/
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: C
Description
Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
>> Why not remove locate from findutils instead of putting it into a
>> separate package? I can't see any reason why one would need it if
>> there's mlocate. Probably add a Recommends: mlocate to findutils.
>
> dlocate iirc
On Nov 12, 2007 11:00 PM, Arthur de Jong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone have a better way to detect the highest open file descriptor
> (preferably something that also works inside a chroot jail that does not
> have /proc mounted)? NetBSD seems to have fcntl(F_MAXFD) that should do
> the trick,
Ivan Shmakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> or with the period escaped.
> ... And this is the thing I haven't found how to do. Could you
> please show me that spell?
\&. Note:
\& is a null token that can be put at the beginning of
> "TV" == Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> $ bash check-man-periods.sh /usr/share/man/man1/*.gz
> Debian has lintian and linda to check for machine-detectable errors
> like this one. Maybe you could wirte the same test in perl/python and
> submit it as a whishlist ite
> Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> --cut--
>> .B ifconfig eth0:0 down
>> . Note: for every scope (i.e. same net with address/netmask combination) all
>> aliases are deleted, if you delete the first (primary).
>> --cut--
[...]
> Yeah, this is a common roff coding probl
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: cython
Version: 0.9.6.8.ds
Upstream Author: Stefan Behnel, Robert Bradshaw, and William Stein
URL: http://www.cython.org/
License: Py
Ivan Shmakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Last week I've reported a bug in ifconfig(8) (as of net-tools
> 1.60-17.) The problem is in that the ifconfig.8 contains the
> following:
> --cut--
> .B ifconfig eth0:0 down
> . Note: for every scope (i.e. same net with address/netmask
Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
> HEAD /bicyclerepair_0.9-4.2.diff.gz HTTP/1.1
> Host: incoming.debian.org
> HTTP/1.1 200 OK
> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:46:25 GMT
> Server: Apache/2.2.3 (Debian)
> Last-Modified: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:32:01 GMT
> ETag: "243c740-f49-43ebeb5c2e640"
> Acc
On 11201 March 1977, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
>> The dak files weren't there before the problems but I guess
>> this is just temporary thing because you don't have permissions to
>> access them and they are only useful for dak itself.
> They would be useful for adding stuff to the new queue inform
On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 12:34 -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 11-Nov-07, 14:25 (CST), Arthur de Jong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This seems to be quite common code (from one of my packages (cvsd),
> > don't know what the original source for this code was):
> >
> > m=sysconf(_SC_OPEN_MAX);
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Brandon Philips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gcalcli
Version : 1.4
Upstream Author : Eric Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/gcalcli/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description
Hi Ivan,
great!
Ivan Shmakov wrote:
> $ bash check-man-periods.sh /usr/share/man/man1/*.gz
Debian has lintian and linda to check for machine-detectable errors like
this one. Maybe you could wirte the same test in perl/python and submit
it as a whishlist item to the BTS for one of those packages.
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 01:26:25AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 21:42:52 -0800, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > Also, do we really need *any* printing system as priority: standard?
> > It's not clear to me that printing is still really part of a standard
> > Uni
On 2007-11-12, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As i'm not a DD, I'll need a sponsor to upload this package.
Hi,
I'll sponsor your package.
--
Robert Edmonds
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA
Last week I've reported a bug in ifconfig(8) (as of net-tools
1.60-17.) The problem is in that the ifconfig.8 contains the
following:
--cut--
.B ifconfig eth0:0 down
. Note: for every scope (i.e. same net with address/netmask combination) all
aliases are deleted, if you de
On 2007-11-12, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ftp-master now runs Apache 2 instead of 1, and the directory listing
> formatting has changed in that version (a instead of ).
> You'll have to live with that (but, alas, it'll not only be incoming.d.o
> where you'll be experiencing/suffer
On 11-Nov-07, 14:25 (CST), Arthur de Jong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This seems to be quite common code (from one of my packages (cvsd),
> don't know what the original source for this code was):
>
> m=sysconf(_SC_OPEN_MAX);
> for (i=0;i close(i);
>
> There are hurd packages for this
Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>> Imho this problem is not one that needs to be solved, if multiple
>> locates are installed, multiple databases should be generated.
> I think differently. Particularly given that findutil's locate can be
> installed only as a dependency of other pa
Nico Golde wrote:
> The dak files weren't there before the problems but I guess
> this is just temporary thing because you don't have permissions to
> access them and they are only useful for dak itself.
They would be useful for adding stuff to the new queue information
without recalculating, e.g
Hi,
HEAD /bicyclerepair_0.9-4.2.diff.gz HTTP/1.1
Host: incoming.debian.org
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:46:25 GMT
Server: Apache/2.2.3 (Debian)
Last-Modified: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:32:01 GMT
ETag: "243c740-f49-43ebeb5c2e640"
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Content-Length: 3913
Content-Type: appli
2007-11-12T18:11:11+0100, "Steinar H. Gunderson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 05:10:08PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > $ lynx http://incoming.debian.org
> >
> > shows an awfully bad formated directory listing and the dak files as
> > well. Is that usual now?
>
> I don't
Hi Steinar,
* Steinar H. Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-12 18:15]:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 05:10:08PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > $ lynx http://incoming.debian.org
> >
> > shows an awfully bad formated directory listing and the dak files as
> > well. Is that usual now?
>
> I do
* Elimar Riesebieter [Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:10:08 +0100]:
> $ lynx http://incoming.debian.org
> shows an awfully bad formated directory listing
ftp-master now runs Apache 2 instead of 1, and the directory listing
formatting has changed in that version (a instead of ).
You'll have to live with tha
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 05:10:08PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> $ lynx http://incoming.debian.org
>
> shows an awfully bad formated directory listing and the dak files as
> well. Is that usual now?
I don't know about lynx, but in Firefox incoming.d.o looks like it has always
done.
/* Stein
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 the mental interface of
Joerg Jaspert told:
> Hi
>
> following my last mail on this topic[1] I now have good news for you:
> ries.debian.org AKA ftp-master.debian.org AKA "the main copy of the
> archive" AKA (lots of) "OH GOD, i can't live without uploading
> packages/getting
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ocaml-soundtouch
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : The Savonet Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://savonet.sourceforge.net/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Ocaml
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, Frans Pop wrote:
Andreas Tille wrote:
I'm wondering whether I did something wrong when filing a "New version
available" bug against a source package.
Other than completely messing up the pseudo-headers in your BR, no ;-)
Your report has:
Package: n
Severity: wishlist
Fil
Andreas Tille wrote:
> I'm wondering whether I did something wrong when filing a "New version
> available" bug against a source package.
Other than completely messing up the pseudo-headers in your BR, no ;-)
Your report has:
Package: n
Severity: wishlist
File: minc
Package "n" is obviously incor
Hi,
I'm wondering whether I did something wrong when filing a "New version
available" bug against a source package. The package in question is
called "minc" and is listed as source package at
http://packages.debian.org/source/minc
as well as former bugs are stored in BTS against this packag
30 matches
Mail list logo
