martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can't believe DNS (or SMTP for that matter) hasn't moved along in
> decades... at least not since people started to understand that data
> redundancy (not caching!) is a bad thing.
Yeah, both DNS and SMTP basically froze in stone a while back, and e
Robert Edmonds wrote:
> This package provides the source code for the tg3dfsg kernel
> module. Kernel source or headers are required to compile this module.
>
> This driver complies with GR 2006-004 and should support all Tigon3
> hardware except for 5701a0 chipsets. I intend to upload it shou
Package: wnpp
Owner: "Robert S. Edmonds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: tg3dfsg
Version : 3.81
Upstream Author : Various
* URL : http://people.debian.org/~edmonds/tg3dfsg/
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang: C
Description : firmwa
*** Final results for competition of September 2007 ***
http://kodakchallenge.110mb.com/forum/index.php?topic=1177.0
*** October Competition Topic *** {Movement and action}
http://kodakchallenge.110mb.com/forum/index.php?topic=1183.0
If you would like to join us follow this link:
http://kodakc
also sprach Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.10.0024 +0100]:
> The only thing RFC 821 cares about is what hostnames you use in
> MAIL FROM and RCPT TO. If you can ensure that your mail setup
> uses the canonical name rather than the alias in the RHS of
> addresses in MAIL FROM, that will
Hello martin,
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also sprach Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.09.2026 +0100]:
>> how about sending mails from master.debian.org with either
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] :)
>
> I couldn't sign those messages.
Give mutt a new sen
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 02:10:37AM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: normal
>
> [Please add me to your CC list.]
>
> I request an adopter for the "kbd" package.
>
> Actually it was never my intention to maintain "kbd", but its
> maintainer was the group "Console utilities
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
[Please add me to your CC list.]
I request an adopter for the "kbd" package.
Actually it was never my intention to maintain "kbd", but its
maintainer was the group "Console utilities maintainers" and it seems
currently I am the only member of this group... :)
Here
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> also sprach Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.09.2243 +0100]:
>> Note, though, that STD-10 is a Standard whereas RFC 2821 is still
>> only a Proposed Standard. IIRC, formally the obsolete only fully
>> applies once RFC 2821 reaches the same le
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 11:15:38PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 03:41:21PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > Given the great abundance of revision control systems already packaged
> > for Debian, what is the point of adding another?
>
> I don't see the relevance
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 03:41:21PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> Given the great abundance of revision control systems already packaged
> for Debian, what is the point of adding another?
I don't see the relevance of this argument, really, but if you really think
it's a problem: What if someon
also sprach Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.09.2243 +0100]:
> Note, though, that STD-10 is a Standard whereas RFC 2821 is still
> only a Proposed Standard. IIRC, formally the obsolete only fully
> applies once RFC 2821 reaches the same level in the standards
> process.
Does that mean I
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> RFC 2821 obsoletes STD-10, and says:
> 3.6 Domains
>Only resolvable, fully-qualified, domain names (FQDNs) are permitted
>when domain names are used in SMTP. In other words, names that can
>be resolved to MX RRs or A RRs (as discussed in
На Tue, 9 Oct 2007 15:53:36 -0400
"Roberto C. Sánchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> записано:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 09:24:14PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 21:29:38 +0400
> > Alexander Gerasiov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Package: wnpp
> > > Severity: wishlist
> > > Owne
Thanks, Ian, for your reply. I don't quite agree with it though.
also sprach Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.09.2102 +0100]:
> The prevailing IETF standard for mail transmission over the Internet
> is STD-10 (RFC821), which says:
RFC 2821 obsoletes STD-10, and says:
3.6 Domains
Only
martin f krafft writes ("seeking: Ian Jackson"):
> In the mean time, I'd be grateful if Ian gave me a means to
> communicate with him. Or if someone would offer to relay a message
> to him.
A few people have drawn my attention to this thread, thanks. For
future reference, my db.debian.org entry o
also sprach Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.09.2026 +0100]:
> how about sending mails from master.debian.org with either
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] :)
I couldn't sign those messages. But I could temporarily set mutt's
$envelope_from_address. Thanks for the hint.
--
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 09:24:14PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 21:29:38 +0400
> Alexander Gerasiov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Alexander Gerasiov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > * Package name: eaccelerator
> > Version
On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 14:36 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> >> Anyway, I'm aware a lot of packages will probably break at the moment,
> >> which
> >> is why I'm using wishlist.
> >
> > I still believe that you should not file such bugs, I still fail to
> > see how it improves debian, as if we re
Hi,
On Tue Oct 09, 2007 at 19:36:49 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] expands to a greenend.org.uk address, and the mx for that
> domain refuses to accept my mail.
>
> : host
> mx-relay.chiark.greenend.org.uk[212.13.197.229] said: 550
> invalid MAIL-FROM: Error during DNS
I don't really think we need to have this discussion on
debian-devel. Sorry for not setting reply-to. I will not post more
than this one reply, which I hope sets things straight.
also sprach Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.09.2015 +0100]:
> RFC 1034 section 3.6.2:
>
> Domain names
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] expands to a greenend.org.uk address, and the mx for that
> domain refuses to accept my mail.
>
> : host
> mx-relay.chiark.greenend.org.uk[212.13.197.229] said: 550
> invalid MAIL-FROM: Error during DNS MX lookup for
> lap
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 08:15:58PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> ti, 2007-10-09 kello 18:33 +0200, Kurt Roeckx kirjoitti:
> > On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 01:44:47PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > > How to help listmasters against spam
> > >
> > >
> > >*
On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 21:29:38 +0400
Alexander Gerasiov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Alexander Gerasiov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: eaccelerator
> Version : 0.9.5.2
> Upstream Author : eaccelerator team http://eaccelerator.net/
On Tue, 09 Oct 2007, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> What should we do with spam send to the BTS that then gets forwarded
> to some list? I think this only happens with pseudo packages, and a
> few others like apt and glibc. Do we report it twice?
For BTS spam, if it's been removed from the bug log already,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] expands to a greenend.org.uk address, and the mx for that
domain refuses to accept my mail.
: host
mx-relay.chiark.greenend.org.uk[212.13.197.229] said: 550
invalid MAIL-FROM: Error during DNS MX lookup for
lapse.madduck.net: DNS alias found where canonical name wante
On Tue, October 9, 2007 18:33, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> I don't see such a button on the list archives. I only see it
> on the BTS.
Check out the top-right of this page:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/10/msg00318.html
Thijs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alexander Gerasiov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: eaccelerator
Version : 0.9.5.2
Upstream Author : eaccelerator team http://eaccelerator.net/wiki/Team
* URL : http://eaccelerator.net
* License : GPL
Programming Lang
ti, 2007-10-09 kello 18:33 +0200, Kurt Roeckx kirjoitti:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 01:44:47PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > How to help listmasters against spam
> >
> >
> >* If you notice a spam in the list archives, press the 'Report As
> > Spa
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 01:44:47PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> How to help listmasters against spam
>
>
>* If you notice a spam in the list archives, press the 'Report As
> Spam'-Button.
I don't see such a button on the list archives. I only s
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 06:12:33PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> This is a status update for the Debian Menu transition.
> 2) Some common mistakes to avoid:
>
> - Do not put menu entries _directly_ under Applications/Science,
> Applications/System and Applications/Network, but in one of
>
Dear developers,
This is a status update for the Debian Menu transition.
1) About 25% of menu files had been updated to the new menu section.
This is promising, but unfortunately, only about 25% of menu files
in removed/split sections have been updated, so there is still a lot of
packages to chan
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package name: dialign-t
Version : 0.2.2
Upstream Author : Amarendran R. Subramanian
URL : http://dialign-t.gobics.de/
License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : Segm
Sam Clegg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Perforce is an absolutely *excellent* VCS with the unfortunate
> > distinction of being proprietary. SubVersion can do most (but not all) of
> > what it does, albeit 10 times slower. Still, I've migrated all of my stuff
> > over to subversion, because, w
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 05:41 +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 03:41:21PM -0400, Roberto C. S?nchez wrote:
> >> Given the great abundance of revision control systems already packaged
> >> for Debian, what is the point of adding another? Especiall
On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 14:42 -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Seems to me that this depends on Perforce. D'oh.
> >
> > (I don't know anything about Perforce. Perhaps it's really dangerous
> > software. But perhaps it's just non-free.)
>
> Perf
36 matches
Mail list logo
