Le Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 03:16:53PM +0100, Jon Dowland a écrit :
>
> I personally agree. I don't bother munging my email address
> at all anymore, as I don't think it helps a great deal in
> the mid to long term, and it certainly detracts from the
> usefulness of an address. However if an upstream
On Sep 30, Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - the first version of the package will build-dep. on the gcc source,
> build the compiler and build the firmware.
> - all new versions of the package will build-depend on the old package
> and just copy the binary blob from it.
>
> Any object
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ... it was already clear that Ben's requests [for valid contact
> information of copyright holders] are pointless.
On the contrary, the request has a clearly- and often-stated point: to
reduce the risk accepted by the Debian project that a copyright
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 12:25:51AM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> What about the following plan:
>
> - the first version of the package will build-dep. on the gcc source,
> build the compiler and build the firmware.
> - all new versions of the package will build-depend on the old package
> and just
Hi,
> In this case the firmware image distributed as a blob in the source
> package can be built using the gcc-4.3-source package to create a
> crosscompiler (there is no requirement to have a single-step procedure).
What about the following plan:
- the first version of the package will build-de
On Sep 28, Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1) Ship a built copy of the code in the package's .diff.gz, and DTRT
> > at package creation time to move the .bin from debian/ to the right
> > place in the staging tree. The source code for the .bin is in
> > .orig.tar.gz, under a free licens
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:26:23PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Attached is a patch to dpkg which implements a check for a 'build-arch'
> target using 'make -f debian/rules -qn build-arch'.
Is there actually a defined semantic for make -qn ? The make info manual
states:
"It is an error to use m
[Piotr Roszatycki]
> 2007/9/26, Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > will that cause dfsg problems?
>
> Not at all. The packages was built with pbuilder. It still is not
> fully understandable, so I'll try explain:
I just downloaded the source package for libdatetime-timezone-perl, and
I
[Roger Leigh]
> But, can you detect it if you are already /inside/ the chroot?
> i.e. chroot(2) has been called at some point previously.
Yes. It's a consequence of two well-known properties of the chroot
call: (1) you can call chroot() even if you are already in a chroot, to
chroot yourself fur
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: xavante
Version: 1.3.1
Upstream Author: Javier Guerra, André Carregal, and Fábio Mascarenhas
URL: http://keplerproject.org/xavante/
L
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Vincent Fourmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libhiglayout-java
Version : 1.0a
Upstream Author : Daniel Michalik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.autel.cz/dmi/tutorial.html
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang:
FAILURE NOTICE
Your request received at September 29, 12:29:48 PM GMT
from e-mail address [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to be faxed to 15035986653
with a subject of
could not be delivered.
Reason for failure: Not a registered user
The originating address of your e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
is
Sam Leon wrote:
> My only complaint is that alot of website traffic analyzer programs pick
> up the debian iceweasel browser as "unknown browser" and "unknown
> operating system"
If they'd do their job right they'd look for the gecko engine and it's
version and not on the name of the browser.
Co
Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Roger Leigh wrote:
>> You can't reliably (or portably) check if you are in a chroot.
> Hmm, if you're root you probably can. Something like this (completely
> untested; probably doesn't even compile):
I agree that this method would work. But, can
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 09:18:12PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 23:04:00 +0200, Martin Uecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > There is some other thing I do not like about the way Debian packages
> > work. Every package I install can actually completely compromise my
> > s
On 9/29/07, Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, if you're root you probably can. Something like this (completely
> untested; probably doesn't even compile):
Yes, it works, and AFAIK it has always done. A shorter program to test it:
#include
#include
#include
#include
int
ma
16 matches
Mail list logo
