Roger Leigh wrote:
> You can't reliably (or portably) check if you are in a chroot.
Hmm, if you're root you probably can. Something like this (completely
untested; probably doesn't even compile):
DIR *d;
int fd;
struct stat s1, s2;
mkdir("temp", 0700);
d = opendir("/");
f
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 23:04:00 +0200, Martin Uecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> There is some other thing I do not like about the way Debian packages
> work. Every package I install can actually completely compromise my
> system, because the maintainer scripts are run as root.
You can, of
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-pynxt
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : David Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : https://ssl.natulte.net/nxos/devel
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang: Python
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 12:40:39AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 28 septembre 2007 à 13:49 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> > "You" don't distribute the package?
> > Ben Finney is not a Debian Developer. The views expressed by Ben Finney on
> > this mailing list are not representa
Hi,
> I'm working on infrastructure to aid generation of cross-compiler
> packages (a templating mechanism that generates the necessary Package
> stanzas in debian/control from another file that uses a descriptive
> language; "debian-xcontrol" would be the package you are looking for,
> however th
Le vendredi 28 septembre 2007 à 13:49 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> "You" don't distribute the package?
>
> Ben Finney is not a Debian Developer. The views expressed by Ben Finney on
> this mailing list are not representative of the views of the Debian Project
> or any of its members.
Oh, co
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ben Finney is not a Debian Developer. The views expressed by Ben
> Finney on this mailing list are not representative of the views of
> the Debian Project or any of its members.
With the caveat "not *necessarily* representative", we agree on that.
--
Andre Majorel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 2007-09-27 16:39 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> > I think [valid contact information for copyright holders at the
> > time of packaging] should be required, in order that Debian users
> > can have more confidence [0] in the copyright status of works in
>
Sam Leon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My only complaint is that alot of website traffic analyzer programs
> pick up the debian iceweasel browser as "unknown browser" and
> "unknown operating system"
That's a bug in those web sites, of course. They shouldn't even be
trying to sniff User-Agent to
Someone wrote:
> If you actually need to make this sort of response, could you do the
> rest of us a favor and not do so publicly?
Ya, you're right. Sorry.
My frustration got the better of me.
- Bruce
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 11:04:00PM +0200, Martin Uecker wrote:
>
> There is some other thing I do not like about the way Debian
> packages work. Every package I install can actually completely
> compromise my system, because the maintainer scripts are run
> as root. It would be nice if normal pack
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 09:05:59AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Martin Uecker wrote:
> > You are seriously stating that is as easy to hide a trojan in the
> > source code as in the binary?
>
> Consider the fact that we've already had such a case,[1] whereas we've
> not (to my
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 10:13:39PM +0200, Andre Majorel wrote:
> On 2007-09-27 16:39 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> > Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I don't think there is any requirement to have any upstream contact
> > > information whatsoever in order to be able to distribute a pa
Hi,
David Anderson wrote:
But, if there is precedent, it might not be too painful to mimick
existing cross-compiler packages to build my own. I'll see what I can
do.
Please coordinate any such effort with [EMAIL PROTECTED] :-)
I'm working on infrastructure to aid generation of cross-compiler
On 9/28/07, Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Pro: feels like the Right Way, in a perfect world. Cons: opens the
> > floodgates of packaging cross-compilers, likely requires
> > additions/modifications to packaging tools, and takes way more time
> > than I'm personally ready to put into pa
On 2007-09-27 16:39 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I don't think there is any requirement to have any upstream contact
> > information whatsoever in order to be able to distribute a package.
>
> This seems to be the point of disagreement. I think this
David Anderson writes ("Packaging a library that requires cross-compiled code"):
> 2) Package an arm7 cross-compiling gcc with just the right set of
> options, integrate that with the packaging tools, and then package
> with a Build-Depends on the cross-compiler.
>
> Pro: feels like the Right Way,
Ben Finney writes ("Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file"):
> I argue that the only fair place to draw the line is "valid RFC 2821
> email address". The alternative is to leave it to ongoing subjective
> judgement of unspecified Debian parties as to which addresses make
> sense or no
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Martin Uecker wrote:
> You are seriously stating that is as easy to hide a trojan in the
> source code as in the binary?
Consider the fact that we've already had such a case,[1] whereas we've
not (to my knowledge) distributed a trojaned binary. I'm not sure
which is easier to
On 9/27/07, Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think this is the way to go unless you get some concrete objections.
> There is certainly precedent - see for instance the ia32-libs /
> amd64-libs packages (which are frowned upon for whole different
> reasons).
[replying here, but this
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Olivier Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi.
I intent to propose a generic Debian package for the following software.
We've made a local package already, on an old version of the program, which
suited our needs for the PicoForge platform (some details at
http
Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Julien BLACHE wrote:
>> Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I think we need a change in policy for handling cases where free
>>> software requires free software in order to compile which is, non the
>>> less, non buildable on the same pla
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julian Mehnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: net-dns-resolver-programmable-perl
Version : 0.003.1
Upstream Author : Julian Mehnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable/
* Licen
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julian Mehnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: mail-spf-perl
Version : 2.005
Upstream Author : Julian Mehnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mail-SPF/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Perl
Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I think we need a change in policy for handling cases where free
>> software requires free software in order to compile which is, non the
>> less, non buildable on the same platform.
>
> It exists already, it's called the cont
My only complaint is that alot of website traffic analyzer programs pick
up the debian iceweasel browser as "unknown browser" and "unknown
operating system"
Sam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sergei Golovan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: tklib
Version : 0.4.1
Upstream Author : Various people (every module has its own author(s))
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/tcllib/
* License : BSD
Programming
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ben Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: emusic-remote
Version : 1.0.0.1
Upstream Author : emusic.com
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/emusicremote/
* License : LGPL
Sorry i cant add ur link, i need atleast PR-3 link pages:
My link info are here - if any one interested please let me know:
Dear Webmaster,
I'm a webmaster of following travel related websites:
http://www.apartotels.com/
http://www.discountcityhotels.net/
http://www.discountcityhotels.com
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: miniupnpc
Version : 1.0-RC9
Upstream Author : Thomas Bernard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://miniupnp.free.fr/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C, C++
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: minissdpd
Version : 1.0-RC9
Upstream Author : Thomas Bernard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://miniupnp.free.fr/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C, C++
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: miniupnpd
Version : 1.0-RC9
Upstream Author : Thomas Bernard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C, C++
Description
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 06:31:58PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:28:47 +0200, Martin Uecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
[...]
> >> But recompiling from what? If you do not get the exact same source,
> >> you have no hope of getting the same result.
>
> > I had the impre
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Mike O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-contract
Version : 1.4-1
Upstreem Author : Terence Way <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.wayforward.net/pycontract/
* License : Python License, GPL-3, Artist
Xin chao! Toi muon Dat ve may Bay di ve Viet Nam vao khoang 30thang 12 nam 2007
va tro lai Nhat vao khoang 12 thang 1 nam 2008 thi phai Dat mua o dau ! thu tuc
nhu the nao , lien he voi ai ! va gia ve Khu hoi trong thoi diem do la nhu the
nao ! Rat mong duoc su Huong van va giup do!! Hien Toi da
Le vendredi 28 septembre 2007 à 13:17 +1000, Paul Wise a écrit :
> On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 23:26 -0300, Carlos Laviola wrote:
>
> > * Needs no additional packages - embedded versions of vamps and
> > dvdauthor are used, to be as fast as possible.
>
> Please notify the Debian security team so
36 matches
Mail list logo
