Quoting Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Actually, policy is usually the last thing that you want to
> do, in the general case. Policy is usually stable (well, not quite as
> stable as it has been this year, but work seems to be easing up a
> trifle, so expect a policy release in
21-09-2007, Bruce Sass:
> On Thu September 20 2007 09:25:23 pm Oleg Verych (Gmane) wrote:
>> 19-09-2007, Bruce Sass:
>> > I'm hoping the dpkg "triggers" functionality Ian Jackson has been
>> > working on will help solve that wart though.
>>
>> How exactly?
>
> Exactly? I don't know. I haven't follo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: xmms-pulse
Version : 0.9.3
Upstream Author : Lennart Poettering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://0pointer.de/lennart/projects/xmms-pulse/
* License : GPL v2
Programmin
On Sep 22, Peter Eckersley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This means, in practice, that many sites will be able to track Debian
> users by their User-Agent, even if (say) the user is blocking cookies or
> limiting them to a single session and is changing IP address regularly.
This is highly debateab
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 06:03:05PM -0700, Peter Eckersley wrote:
>
> What do people think of picking a single User-Agent string for all
> versions of all of Debian's Gecko-based browsers?
>
It would be sort of pointless unless we could find a way to all browse
from the same IP address.
Regards,
Consider for a moment a typical User-Agent string sent by a Debian web browser:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070802 Iceape/1.1.4
(Debian-1.1.4-1)
Unfortunately, the fact that this information identifies a specific
package and version of that package means that Debi
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 06:33:51PM -0700, Mike Markley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 11:46:18PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Both dkim-milter and libdkim builds libdkim-dev, and libdkim0 and libdkim2
> > conflict too, even though the names aren't
* Manoj Srivastava [Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:51:03 -0500]:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:08:12 +0300, Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > At the very least, lintian should stop warning about Homepage:, right?
> > (Sorry if it already doesn't warn, I haven't had time to upgrade and
> > the machine
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:08:12 +0300, Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> pe, 2007-09-21 kello 16:44 +0200, Adeodato Simó kirjoitti:
>> * Christian Perrier [Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:02:56 +0200]:
>>
>> > Again, please comment,
>>
>> Personally, I think the change that should really go first is
pe, 2007-09-21 kello 16:44 +0200, Adeodato Simó kirjoitti:
> * Christian Perrier [Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:02:56 +0200]:
>
> > Again, please comment,
>
> Personally, I think the change that should really go first is lintian/linda
> (emitting a warning for packages that put the homepage in the descript
Le vendredi 21 septembre 2007 à 20:49 +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld a écrit :
> Whats so bad about this? FOSS is much about choice, isn't it? Why
> shouldn't the user have the choice to select from different tools? In my
> humble opinion it does not make so much sense to pack those tools
> together jus
Mike Hommey schrieb:
> What are we going to see next ? Yet another package because someone else
> will feel none of gitpkg or git-buildpackage fit his needs ?
Whats so bad about this? FOSS is much about choice, isn't it? Why
shouldn't the user have the choice to select from different tools? In my
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 04:53:34PM +0930, Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 07:42:52AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 10:49:26AM +0930, Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Package: wnpp
> > >
> > > * Package name: gitpkg
> > > Description :
* Christian Perrier [Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:02:56 +0200]:
> Again, please comment,
Personally, I think the change that should really go first is lintian/linda
(emitting a warning for packages that put the homepage in the description),
since that's what will make most packages change, and will give t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Deepak Tripathi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name : libconvert-pem-perl
Version : 0.07
Upstream Author : Benjamin Trott, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
http://search.cpan.org/~btrott/Convert-PEM-0.07/
* Elimar Riesebieter [Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:06:21 +0200]:
> It looks like it can be used to strip uri's out of MUA to view i.e.
> inet pages similar to urlview?
I don't know, so you'd have to ask upstream, but personally I doubt it.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó da
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Homepage thing, I would much rather see a working design, supported by
> apt and p.d.o, make any changes or tweaks as are needed; and _then_ we
p.d.o already supports it. "apt-cache show" obviouly displays the field.
The work left concerns higher-l
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Patrick Schoenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: innotop
Version : 1.4.3
Upstream Author : Baron Schwartz
* URL : http://innotop.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : A mysql a
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:02:56 +0200, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Quoting Lars Wirzenius ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>> I'd start with amending the Developers' Reference, then having a test
>> added to lintian and linda, and after that announcing it on
>> debian-devel-announce. Then next
Hi,
While in the process of working on a new fvwm package, I
noticed that the Menu policy has changed some of the old titles to new
ones. For example, WindowManagers => "Window Managers", Modules =>
"FVWM Module" (which is incorrect; the correct way to address the wm
is Fvwm).
Hi,
IANADD but...
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Then file a bug against *apt* packages and p.d.o to have them support
> displaying info from that field, before or after the d-d-a
> announcement.
you wrote what I thought when I read this proposal. After all it makes
sense to first add support for th
Hi all,
On Fri, 21 Sep, 2007 at 07:35:47AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Package: liquidlnf
> Priority: Normal
> Version: 2.9.1-2
>
> Please stop using sitetruth.com in your debian/watch -- I think it would
> be preferable to just disable the watch file until uscan gets https
> support, if it does
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 07:42:52AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 10:49:26AM +0930, Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> >
> > * Package name: gitpkg
> > Description : helper scripts for maintaining packages with git
> >
> > This packages provides som
23 matches
Mail list logo
