I get the same thing as well.
Lots of my machines hang on pulling package lists sometimes, and they
hang for sure on package updates.
Tom
On Wed, Sep
05, 2007 at 08:41:51PM
-0500,
John Goerzen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 35.9.37.225, in http.us.debian.org, and ftp.us.debian.org, has been
> unreachable
Hi,
35.9.37.225, in http.us.debian.org, and ftp.us.debian.org, has been
unreachable on port 80 from all the networks I have access to for days.
This is ftp.egr.msu.edu.
It is also still listed at http://www.debian.org/mirror/list
It is listed "bad" at http://mirror.debian.org/status.html
Can
On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 22:51:30 +0200
Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On a related note, I'm thinking that *all* packages using ./configure
> > should be using:
> > DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE := $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)
> > DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE := $(shell dpkg-archite
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bastian Kleineidam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: libhx
Version : 1.10.0
Upstream Author : Jan Engelhardt
* URL : http://freshmeat.net/projects/libhx/
* License : GPL2,
Hi,
> On a related note, I'm thinking that *all* packages using ./configure
> should be using:
> DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE := $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)
> DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE := $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE)
> ...
> ./configure --host=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE) --build=$(DEB
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 11:34:05AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> The manpages-es maintainer's e-mail bounces. Does anyone know how to
> contact Rubén Porras Campo?
I spoke with Rubén and told him about the mail troubles. I think
he can be reached at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for now. He said he'll be
makin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Giuseppe Iuculano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: qmailadmin
Version : 1.2.11
Upstream Author : Ken Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/qmailadmin/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 05:33:40PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Just a quick note to say that after some discussion in #debian-devel
> involving Daniel, Patrick, and Michael, and fostered by various DDs
> (azeem, buxy, Ganneff, myself), a solution to resolve this situation was
> achieved.
>
Can
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 19:31:48 +0200
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It has been suggested in bug #411520 that cdbs should be set up so that
> it preserves CFLAGS set in the environment. But I haven't found any
> clear specification about how debian/rules, being a makefile, should
>
It has been suggested in bug #411520 that cdbs should be set up so that
it preserves CFLAGS set in the environment. But I haven't found any
clear specification about how debian/rules, being a makefile, should
deal with environment variables.
The best I could find is Policy 10.1 which states th
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 06:45:18PM +0200, arno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le mercredi 05 septembre 2007, à 17:50:35 +0200, Mike a écrit :
> >
> > Actually, it *does* allow global extensions, but applications embedding
> > libxul or using xulrunner have to initialize the extensions manager by
>
Le mercredi 05 septembre 2007, à 17:50:35 +0200, Mike a écrit :
>
> Actually, it *does* allow global extensions, but applications embedding
> libxul or using xulrunner have to initialize the extensions manager by
> themselves in order to get these extensions enabled. This is something that
> is,
Hi,
> That's one of the (too many) things I've got on my todo list - get
> myself trained as a proper Debian developer. For the moment, I just
> have some scripts (mostly inherited, I've only had time to clean them
> up so far) that do the packaging mostly right; the scripts know more
> about Debi
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 05:11:51PM +0200, arno renevier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: arno renevier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: xulrunner-l10n
> Version : 1.8.1-1
> Upstream Author : Mozilla Project and Mozilla Localization
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: arno renevier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: xulrunner-l10n
Version : 1.8.1-1
Upstream Author : Mozilla Project and Mozilla Localization Projects
* URL : http://www.mozilla.org/projects/l10n/
* License : GPL, LGPL, a
Just a quick note to say that after some discussion in #debian-devel
involving Daniel, Patrick, and Michael, and fostered by various DDs
(azeem, buxy, Ganneff, myself), a solution to resolve this situation was
achieved.
In particular, development will return to the pkg-virtualbox Alioth
project (P
05-09-2007, Gabor Gombas:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 08:26:41PM +, Oleg Verych: gmane reading wrote:
>
>> I.e *i don't care* about entering passwords on middle ground, without
>> knowing, WTF this installer may do with them, not having comfortable
>> environment for that _important_ action.
>>
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 04:43:09PM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> Zitat von "Roberto C. Sánchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >Dynamic linking is what the security team likes since it means that you
> >only update the code once for the whole system. However, in the event
> >that there is an update whic
Steffen:
>> So, the Debian community would have someone (and sadly only one) who can
>> inspect your source and fix issues that arise. The benefit I see for Opera
>> is
>> a further decreased footprint.
Bernd:
> if opera would be come open-source, I'd be willing to co-maintain and
> check packag
Zitat von "Roberto C. Sánchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Dynamic linking is what the security team likes since it means that you
only update the code once for the whole system. However, in the event
that there is an update which makes the library non-binary compatible,
then there is another problem.
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 02:49:25PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Sep 2007, Patrick Winnertz wrote:
> > This was no good work which was quicked hacked together.
> I'm sorry, but when I upload a new upstream release of Django, I don't
> check every new file.
> It's all good that you do
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 11:39:42AM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Michael Meskes wrote:
> > I have no idea what Daniel really did on the package.
> I did about 90% of the inital packaging.
Which just left the last 90% of the packaging, I guess.
> Patrick uploaded removed me from changelog in the
Hi,
> So, the Debian community would have someone (and sadly only one) who can
> inspect your source and fix issues that arise. The benefit I see for Opera is
> a further decreased footprint.
>
>
if opera would be come open-source, I'd be willing to co-maintain and
check packages - it would b
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Games Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: es-shooter
Version : 1.0a
Upstream Author : HIZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://hizuoka.web.fc2.com/game/ES/ES_d.zip
* License : http://www5.atwiki.jp/yaruhara/page
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 03:16:07PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 05 September 2007 13:23:46 Edward Welbourne wrote:
>
> > I'm confused. Pierre appears to be saying "static is bad", Bruce
> > "closed must be static". We have both static and shared packages, so
> > you can take y
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Games Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: projectl
Version : 1.001
Upstream Author : HIZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://hizuoka.web.fc2.com/game/projectL/index_en.html
* License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, e
Le mercredi 05 septembre 2007 à 22:15 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu a écrit :
> * The creation of new alternative name:
> - ttf-japanese-mincho.ttf
> - ttf-japanese-gothic.ttf
> 3. The application that specifies a specific Japanese font package
> dependency
> replaces its dependency to t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Games Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: tatan
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : HIZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://hizuoka.web.fc2.com/game/tatan/index_en.html
* License : http://www5.atwiki.jp/yaruhara/pa
Hi all.
We, the Japanese font packages maintainers and their
collaborators (Japanese Task Force: JTF), propose
following action items to ease the task of the default
font selection for applications under the Debian system.
* The creation of new virtual package name:
- ttf-japanese-mincho
Dear Edward,
many thanks for joining in.
On Wednesday 05 September 2007 13:23:46 Edward Welbourne wrote:
> > Opera could offer an apt repository for the .deb
>
> We already do :-)
> Here's the line from my /etc/apt/sources.list:
>
> deb http://deb.opera.com/opera/ testing non-free
I was pointed
On Wed, 05 Sep 2007, Patrick Winnertz wrote:
> This was no good work which was quicked hacked together.
I'm sorry, but when I upload a new upstream release of Django, I don't
check every new file.
It's all good that you do it, but it's not necessarily a requirement
and I find it hard to blame da
Patrick Winnertz wrote:
> The upload after the debconf shows me that you doesn't really check what
> you do there.
This package was done and uploaded by Phillip, not me.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: ht
Patrick Winnertz wrote:
> I add it to the svn you removed it and when i ask you why you do it, you
> told me that the tarballs doesn't belong into svn. you never mention any
> other place where to put the tarball.
>
> The only thing you mentioned were debian/rules upstream to build it, so
> t
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 02:01:39PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> My point is, that it is, of course, a serious error, but not a critical
> one. It may have not been put well enough in words by me.
I cannot speak for our ftp admins here, but I definitely would call this
very critical if I was one
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 02:08:47PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Michael Meskes wrote:
> > Are we talking about the same upstream here?
>
> i did answer to this question to michael in private (nda reasons).
You're kidding right? This has to be a joke. Please tell me it is. Or is
there another em
Am Mittwoch, 5. September 2007 14:01:39 schrieb Daniel Baumann:
> Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > NO. There is absolutely no reason to *knowingly* upload a non-free
> > tarball, even named ".dfsg".
>
> For the records: I did *not* knowingly see that one.
Yes. bt a simply "find . -type f | sort > /tmp/new
Le mercredi 05 septembre 2007 à 14:08 +0200, Daniel Baumann a écrit :
> Michael Meskes wrote:
> > Are we talking about the same upstream here?
>
> i did answer to this question to michael in private (nda reasons).
If there are restrictions on the package name, this definitely looks
like something
Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Are we talking about the same upstream here?
>
> i did answer to this question to michael in private (nda reasons).
Please post this explanation to -private.
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Public key a
Am Mittwoch, 5. September 2007 12:54:23 schrieb Daniel Baumann:
> tarballs can be produced with the invokation of 'debian/rules upstream'.
>
> it is debatable if the upstream tarball has to be inside the svn, rather
> than the alioth webspace (which I recommended you to do instead). other
> teams,
Michael Meskes wrote:
> Are we talking about the same upstream here?
i did answer to this question to michael in private (nda reasons).
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~da
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 11:39:42AM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Upstream is generally cooperative and understands the problems, hence I
> see this a bit more relaxed (for the next few days only, until it's
> sorted out). However, if ftp-master do disagree, I'll can re-upload
> 1.4.0, superseeding
Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> NO. There is absolutely no reason to *knowingly* upload a non-free
> tarball, even named ".dfsg".
For the records: I did *not* knowingly see that one.
> "Yay, Upstream understands the problem, lets upload non-free crap to main"
> does
> not work.
My point is, that it is,
Hi debian-devel,
> The web of trust gave me Mr Johan Herland as the only member of strong set
> and I took the freedom to place him on the CC line.
Johan forwarded you to me. For reference, dpkg -s, or the package's
control file, would have told you:
Maintainer: Opera Packaging Team <[EMAIL PR
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Bremner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: sketch
Version : 0.2.9
Upstream Author : Eugene Ressler
* URL : http://www.frontiernet.net/~eugene.ressler
* License : Unknown "Copyleft"
Programming Lang: C
Descripti
On 11133 March 1977, Michael Meskes wrote:
Not rating the act of adding/removing maintainers in an upload, just one
thing:
> But he not just added himself, he also changed some packaging stuff and
> upgraded to a new upstream version. This seems to be done in a hurry as
> he missed some licensing
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 09:24:18PM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> > Description : backtracking LR parser
> >
> > Kelbt generates backtracking LALR(1) parsers. Standard LALR(1) parser
>
> If it is a parser _generator_, mention this in de short description as
> well.
absolutely correct, will
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: policyd-spf-fs
Version : 0+svn21
Upstream Author : Matthias Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.freestone.net/software/policyd-spf-fs/
* License : LGPL 2.1 and/
Patrick Winnertz wrote:
> I started to check in the dfsg- tarball and you remove it again from the
> svn... who should a team work on a package if they doesn't use the same
> tarball at all?
tarballs can be produced with the invokation of 'debian/rules upstream'.
it is debatable if the upstream
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 07:56:21AM +, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Format: 1.7
>Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 20:54:40 +
>Source: librpcsecgss
>Binary: librpcsecgss-dev librpcsecgss3
>Architecture: source i386
>Version: 0.14-2etch1
>Distribution: sta
Am Mittwoch, 5. September 2007 11:39:42 schrieb Daniel Baumann:
> I did about 90% of the inital packaging.
I removed one line from the changelog.. sorry for this. I'll readd it
within the next upload.
> Patrick uploaded removed me from changelog in the two last uploads
> (virtualbox 1.4.0svn4130-
Johan Herland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks for the email. I can assure you that there are many Debianers
> at Opera, although my personal preference is Gentoo. :)
>
> We're genuinely interested in making our product work as well as
> possible on Debian (and as many other distros as practi
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 08:26:41PM +, Oleg Verych: gmane reading wrote:
> I.e *i don't care* about entering passwords on middle ground, without
> knowing, WTF this installer may do with them, not having comfortable
> environment for that _important_ action.
>
> Thus i have silly, empty passwo
Michael Meskes wrote:
> I have no idea
> what Daniel really did on the package.
I did about 90% of the inital packaging.
Can be seen on http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-virtualbox/
> I cannot find him in the
> changelog file.
Patrick uploaded removed me from changelog in the two last uploads
(vir
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Games Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: val-and-rick
Version : 0.1a
Upstream Author : Kenta Cho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~cs8k-cyu/windows/vr0_1a.zip
* License : BSD
Programmi
Hi,
I might be running on incomplete information, but to me it seems that we
had a package hijack over night. Being an uploader and thus part of the
team I'm more than just interested in this and would like the parties to
speak up here and explain. Here's what I know so far:
Both, Patrick Winnert
On Tuesday 28 August 2007, Steffen Moeller wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 August 2007 06:46:47 Bruce Sass wrote:
> > On Mon August 27 2007 05:33:05 pm Romain Beauxis wrote:
> > > Le Tuesday 28 August 2007 00:17:40 Bruce Sass, vous avez écrit :
> > > > On Mon August 27 2007 04:05:24 pm Pierre Habouzit wrote
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 07:59:44PM +, Frank Küster wrote:
> We have a similar problem with TeX documentation. In my opinion, using menu
> categories for doc-base might have been a good start, but we should definitely
> extend that now.
>
> I'm currently in semi-VAC mode and don't have time to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 03:52:47PM -0400, Kevin Coffman wrote:
>Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 15:52:47 -0400
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>From: Kevin Coffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: nfsv4 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject
58 matches
Mail list logo
