Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> With more than 600 issues, it's a bit early to make it a release
> goal IMHO. Though making maintainers aware by upgrading the lintian
> check to a warning and discussion on debian-devel about which
> exceptions are warranted (and possible mass bug filing) w
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 05:15:51PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > It looks like you have not read all the thread, other's have made some
> > good points as to why it's good. Just in case I'm going to voice my opinion
> > here again and see if I can convicen you (and other's listening) :)
>
I'm not sure if I really want to get into the bz2-vs-gz argument again
but there is a question here that's easy to answer:
Romain Francoise writes ("On bz2 compression in debs"):
> 2) Doesn't the disappearance of 'data.tar.gz' warrant a bump of the
> binary version number, from 2.0 to, say, 3
Hi interested parties,
> On 26-Apr-2007 15:24.21 (BST), Stephan Suerken wrote:
> > Generally speaking about packaging, my intend was to drop "uae" in
> > favour of "e-uae" in post-etch, and I would also like a practical
> > setup to allow group-maintaining (considering the time restrictions
>
Juan Céspedes wrote:
> On 8/24/07, David Claughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Amaya wrote:
>> >
>> > if which invoke-rc.d >/dev/null 2>&1; then
>> > invoke-rc.d package
>> > else
>> > /etc/init.d/package
>> > fi
>>
>> I don't want to be a pest (given I'm no
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> From http://blog.orebokech.com/2007/08/debian-packages-without-md5sums.html:
> "Random testing of my local Debian mirror shows that 644 binary packages out
> of 20774 (3.1%) are missing the DEBIAN/md5sums control file."
As of today my c
On 24/08/07, suren M wrote:
> through the Debian developers corner also. I would like to how exactly to
> start, rather if there is some beginners documentation or something like
> that.
http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/ is the document. Also, you can
help out in translation into your (our) l
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 03:16:28PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> I fail to see any reason to HAVE a md5sums file.
>
> It looks like you have not read all the thread, other's have made some
> good points as to why it's good. Just
On 8/24/07, David Claughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Amaya wrote:
> >
> > if which invoke-rc.d >/dev/null 2>&1; then
> > invoke-rc.d package
> > else
> > /etc/init.d/package
> > fi
>
> I don't want to be a pest (given I'm not a developer or maintainer), but
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 03:16:28PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> I fail to see any reason to HAVE a md5sums file.
It looks like you have not read all the thread, other's have made some
good points as to why it's good. Just in case I'm going to voice my opinion
here again and see if I can co
Amaya wrote:
In most cases the fix should be simple, replace this:
/etc/init.d/package
with this:
if which invoke-rc.d >/dev/null 2>&1; then
invoke-rc.d package
else
/etc/init.d/package
fi
Hi,
I don't want to be a pest (given I'm not
Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So my questions are:
>
> 1) If deb(5) is authoritative, am I right in thinking that bz2
> compression is a policy violation at the moment?
Yes and no. deb(5) is authorative but out of sync with the
implementation imho.
> 2) Doesn't the disappe
Am Freitag, 24. August 2007 13:07:02 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Finn-Arne Johansen wrote:
> > What about when we sit and work on a package to fix something, eg.
> > during a gathering, and want to test if the fix work ?
>
> I'm not sure whether I understand the problem? Is there
Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> [ fully quoting my original request, for the sake of context
>> preservation ]
>
> Thanks for initiating the discussion! :-)
>
>> On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 09:04:13AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Patrick Winnertz wrote:
Mh... I think this was from debian-edu ;-) ^^
reply to it in order to get this answer into the correct ML.
Ups, sorry
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
hello !
I am Suren, third year ,Electrical engineering from India . I am an active
member of GLUG-T - GNU/Linux User group Trichy. I have good linux experience
as an user and web admin for the past one year.
I would like to learn more and be an active developer for Debian. I went
through the Debian
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 11:28:13AM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Due to upstream bugs and/or packaging mistakes some Debian packages like
> > Abiword [1] or Wireshark [2] are currently unintentionally built without
> > any compiler optimization [3].
> >
> > This results in pr
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Finn-Arne Johansen wrote:
What about when we sit and work on a package to fix something, eg.
during a gathering, and want to test if the fix work ?
I'm not sure whether I understand the problem? Is there any
difference between work in gatherings and otherwise? Do you
thi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Todd Troxell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: flvtool2
Version : 1.0.6
Upstream Author : Norman Timmler
* URL : http://www.inlet-media.de/flvtool2
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description : a manipulat
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Due to upstream bugs and/or packaging mistakes some Debian packages like
> Abiword [1] or Wireshark [2] are currently unintentionally built without
> any compiler optimization [3].
>
> This results in programs being both significantely bigger and
> significantely slower than
20 matches
Mail list logo
