On 8/16/07, Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Should we hijack/adopt the package, or will its current maintainers
> stand up and get it back to life?
> - Is there somebody who wants to lead this?
> - Pkg-perl and/or Apache groups: Do you agree? :)
> - In any other case: Other takers?
I
Hi all,
First some background info. Gmailfs is basically using your
gmail account as a filesystem. I've been trying to use gmailfs on
ubuntu gutsy for the past 12 hrs. without success. Please note that
I'm cross-posting this both as the package is both in debian as well
as ubuntu. As Seb
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> - Should we hijack/adopt the package, or will its current
> maintainers stand up and get it back to life?
I also found myself looking at this package recently too; whether it's
under the perl group, debian-apache, or some other team, I'd be happy
to assi
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 09:32:30PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Of course, before any action, I'd like to hear Thom's or Andres' points
> of view.
You probably want to hear my input too. :-)
At Debconf5, I was more or less persuaded into taking the package (up to
the level where I actually had the
Hi all,
I'm sending this mail as an answer to #438168 - A user
(understandably) fed up by what seems to be lack of attention to a
package that is core to many people's work, libapache2-mod-perl2. I
send this mail with some fear, of course, as I do not really want to
adopt it - but... Well, the cir
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: openbios-sparc
Version : 1.0alpha2
Upstream Author : Stefan Reinauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Samuel Rydh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.openbios.org/
* Lic
Asheesh Laroia schrieb:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Asheesh Laroia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: libexempi2
> Version : x.y.z
> Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.example.org/
> * License : LGPL
> Pro
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Asheesh Laroia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libexempi2
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : A library
Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 07:55:36PM +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
>> 1. use an editor which can auto-detect the file encoding, e.g. vim
>> AND
>> 2. run poedit on a file which is in encoding A, while your locale is set
>> to use encoding B. (where neither
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: LI Daobing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: multiget
Version : 1.1.4
Upstream Author : liubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://multiget.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : grap
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christoph Goehre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: icedove-dispmua
Version : 1.3.2
Upstream Author : Christian Weiske <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://cweiske.de/misc_extensions.htm#dispMUA
* License : GPL
Programmi
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 07:55:36PM +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> First, a short explanation of the use case:
>
> 1. User runs poedit (aka potooledit) on a partially translated po file.
> 2. Poedit retrieves only the untranslated messages from the file (by
>filtering it through potool -fnt) an
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: LI Daobing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gviterm
Version : 0.1+r10
Upstream Author : yetist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/gviterm/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : gvim
I noticed that the Xorg (xorg-server) upstream changelog is starting to
get a bit large, ChangeLog.gz 341K.
How much sense would there be in using, say, bzip2 compression instead?
In this particular example that would reduce ChangeLog.bz2 to 251K, a
space saving of 26%.
A change like this woul
I have worked out the packaging of the current "ghostscript" Ubuntu
package with the Debian maintainer of Ghostscript, Masayuki Hatta. We
agreed especially on the name "ghostscript" because it is much easier
for search functions to find "ghostscript" than to find "gs".
"ghostscript" is obsolet
Hi,
Thanks for this good news.
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 12:09:05AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> recently ghostscript 8.60 was released [1] which is now available under
> the GPL.
> The features of ESP Ghostscript have been merged into Ghostscript GPL
> and the upstream of gs-esp
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: LI Daobing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: pdb2pqr
Version : 1.2.1
Upstream Author : jens_nielsen, sobolevnrm, todd_dolinsky
* URL : exec /usr/lib/autossh/autossh
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Descriptio
On Aug 12, Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > multi-gnome-terminal
> Already obsolete, IIRC ?
I wish, since it is a buggy POS which does not even support UTF-8 and
has been abandoned long ago by the upstream maintainers.
But it's the only terminal which I am really comfortable using sin
also sprach Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.08.10.1746 +0200]:
> Martin Krafft and I jointly gave a talk at Debconf about use of
> distributed version control systems for Debian packages (this is the
> quilt/dpatch/other dimension); I would be happy to help documenting
> that
Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> Native packages do get binNMUed; anna was recently binNMUed on several archs
> in response to the ldbl symbol skew, so there are now 1.27+b1 packages in
> the archive for alpha, powerpc, s390, and sparc. So no dash being added to
> the version number, as none is needed,
Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
> On 8/14/07, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 19:57:51 +0200
>> "Carl Fürstenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I knew that my list was incomplete, so if you want to regenerate the
>>> page, use following perl script:
>>>
>>> #!/usr/bin/p
Hi there!
I have posted a wishlist bug against gs-gpl concerning this issue just
yesterday:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=437848
Cheers,
Fabian
--
Dipl.-Phys. Fabian Greffrath
Lehrstuhl für Energieanlagen und Energieprozesstechnik
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Universitätsstraße
22 matches
Mail list logo
