Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > My mail client is a script, ~/bin/mail-handler; which, I
> > think, is not permissible in reportbug-ng. In other words, the
> > user can not configure the reporter; they can ask the author to
> > add in some stan
* Adeodato Simó [Mon, 23 Jul 2007 00:05:59 +0200]:
> xdg-email does not deal with clients directly; it just constructs a
> mailto: URL from its arguments and options (or a mailto: url can be
> given directly if that's easier for the caller), and opens it with the
> appropriate command depending on
* Bastian Venthur [Sun, 22 Jul 2007 23:50:49 +0200]:
> I'll have to investigate which mail clients xdg-email supports and
> whether it supports at least the to-, subject- and body for all of them.
> If this is the case, I should make it the default and leave the other
> ones as an option.
xdg-ema
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 23:07:08 +0200, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> This reminds me: do you know about /usr/bin/xdg-email (from package
>> xdg-utils)? I don't know if reportbug must get a MUA configured before
>> being able to send reports; if so, xdg-email wou
* Manoj Srivastava [Sun, 22 Jul 2007 16:32:23 -0400]:
> something as heavy weight as xdg-utils
The number of Depends of xdg-utils is zero, Installed-Size 260.
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Bastian Venthur [Sun, 22 Jul 2007 10:34:06 +0200]:
>
>> That's not true. As I already told you, all you have to do is to send me
>> a valid call of your mail client where the composer opens with to-,
>> subject- and body prefilled.
>
> This reminds me: do you know about /
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> My mail client is a script, ~/bin/mail-handler; which, I think,
> is not permissible in reportbug-ng. In other words, the user can not
> configure the reporter; they can ask the author to add in some standard
> mail clients; but not the non-standard ones.
It
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 23:07:08 +0200, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> * Bastian Venthur [Sun, 22 Jul 2007 10:34:06 +0200]:
>> That's not true. As I already told you, all you have to do is to send
>> me a valid call of your mail client where the composer opens with
>> to-, subject- and bod
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 04:42:48PM +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> While you're at it, can you please also add reportbug-ng to the list of
> tools helping the user to provide bug reports?
I'd rather suggest to add a paragraph discouraging users from using rng
at this point, until it meets the deve
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 10:34:06 +0200, Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 10:50:15 +0200, Bastian Venthur
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>> Or, if you prefer a GUI application with out of the box support for
>>> most mail clients, try reportbug-
* Bastian Venthur [Sun, 22 Jul 2007 10:34:06 +0200]:
> That's not true. As I already told you, all you have to do is to send me
> a valid call of your mail client where the composer opens with to-,
> subject- and body prefilled.
This reminds me: do you know about /usr/bin/xdg-email (from package
I find it easy enough to do:
$ sudo apt-get update
$ apt-src -bi install $package
apt-src will then "install" the source of the package into the current
working directory, then "b"uild it, and then "i"nstall the resulting
binaries.
Thanks for the tip. This is actually very comfortable and wor
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007, Ondrej Certik wrote:
The actual discussion came up when we talked about whether the current
GR on non-DDs with upload permissions is good or bad for Debian. And we
agreed that Debian lacks a lot of packages just because the poor
package maintainer (tm) didn't find a sponso
Am Sonntag, den 22.07.2007, 21:01 +0200 schrieb Ondrej Certik:
[..]
> I think it would also help, if
> there was some official repository for unnoficial packages, so that I
> (as non-DD) could just upload my package to mentors (which I can now)
> and then just add the "deb" line (not just "deb-src
The actual discussion came up when we talked about whether the current
GR on non-DDs with upload permissions is good or bad for Debian. And we
agreed that Debian lacks a lot of packages just because the poor package
maintainer (tm) didn't find a sponsor in time.
Yes, that is the most difficult p
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 07:37:13PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> [...]
> Thanks for your work! But basically you do work that already
> had been done by mentors.debian.net. Ok not everyone is
> using this service but it would be good if they would.
Ah, you get beaten in the race quite often! ;-)
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 07:37:13PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi,
> * Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-22 19:26]:
> > (Cross posted to debian-devel, debian-mentors)
> > Dear Debian developers,
> >
> > I have written a few crude and rudimentary scripts to find an
> > approximate list of p
Hi,
* Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-22 19:26]:
> (Cross posted to debian-devel, debian-mentors)
> Dear Debian developers,
>
> I have written a few crude and rudimentary scripts to find an
> approximate list of packages which have been or have _not_ been
> sponsored despite an RFS to d
(Cross posted to debian-devel, debian-mentors)
Dear Debian developers,
I have written a few crude and rudimentary scripts to find an
approximate list of packages which have been or have _not_ been
sponsored despite an RFS to debian-mentors.
The program generates bad output if the RFS mailer has n
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> The last sentence makes no sense, because WM's do not depend on the
> "Menu System". They only Recommends or Suggests "menu". So you can
> not drop anything.
I'm talking about droping the 'Debian menu' here, not droping
dependencices on 'the menu syst
Am 2007-07-15 22:57:10, schrieb Daniel Leidert:
> Am Samstag, den 14.07.2007, 12:44 -0400 schrieb Joey Hess:
> > Until there is one, I don't see any reason why I should accept patches
> > adding menu files to my packages.
>
> The .desktop format is not only about the menu item itself. It also
> co
Am 2007-07-14 10:55:00, schrieb Bernhard R. Link:
> * Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070713 23:44]:
> > IMO the Debian menu should be entirely deprecated unless something
> > serious is done about it. Currently:
> > * It is utterly and absolutely ugly. 32x32 XPM icons are not
> >
Hi Don,
Am 2007-07-16 04:12:02, schrieb Don Armstrong:
> So it seems like we should do the following:
>
> 1. Make changes to the menu system to use .desktop files in preference
> to .menu files when they exist
>
> 2. Generate .desktop files from .menu files using the menu system when
> .desktop
Hello Neil,
Am 2007-07-15 14:11:55, schrieb Neil Williams:
> If all Gnome packages silently drop debian/menu in the next upload, is
> that actually going to be a problem for anyone?
Since WE (me, colegous and friends) do not use any GNOME/KDE Apps,
where will be no lost for us.
But maybe the KDE
Am 2007-07-13 23:43:56, schrieb Josselin Mouette:
> Le vendredi 13 juillet 2007 à 16:54 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit :
> > I've gotten some bug reports lately asking for desktop files to be added
> > to packages like xgalaga and kobodeluxe, and saw some others in the BTS.
> > All of these packages, of
Hello Joey,
Am 2007-07-13 18:02:18, schrieb Joey Hess:
> Bastian Venthur wrote:
> You should be able to do this on your own system by editing
> /etc/menu-methods/translate_menus.
>
> But.. The Appications menu can already have up to 23 submenus, and already
> grows beyond 10 on many typical syste
Am 2007-07-13 23:49:29, schrieb Josselin Mouette:
> Le vendredi 13 juillet 2007 à 17:30 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit :
> > There are probably enhancements that would let it create _better_
> > .desktop files. For example, ones with translations..
>
> Ah, right. I forgot translations. Another good reas
Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-22 13:17]:
>> Is Andrew Lau ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) known to be MIA?
>
> mia-query says no
I already checked that, but I thought I had better make a better check
before contacting the MIA team.
Thanks,
Roger
--
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007, Nico Golde wrote:
> mia-query says no
Hello,
mia-query only lists summaries of email exchanges with the person in
question. That means that when it says "no", it only says "I am not
aware of him being MIA". So I've marked him inactive right now but I
will have to contact him
Hallo Roger,
* Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-22 13:17]:
> Is Andrew Lau ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) known to be MIA?
mia-query says no
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted
Hi folks,
Is Andrew Lau ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) known to be MIA?
The packages he maintains and co-maintains are listed below. Most are
GNOME packages he has not apparently uploaded. Some are already
comaintained by others. The two of most concern are cinepaint and
cupsys-pt, which are not comainta
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: moe
Version : 0.9
Upstream Author : Antonio Diaz Diaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.gnu.org/software/moe/moe.html
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Descri
GARDUL VIU-MINUNE!!!
Creste rapid (1.20-1.80 m/an)!!!
E incredibil de nepretentios!!! (atât în privinta solului cât si a îngrijirii)
E incredibil de ieftin!!!
Capacitate de umbrire excelenta!
Capacitate antipraf de un grad înalt!
Este o planta foioasa, de culoare verde viu, cu frunze mici lucioase,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Arnaud Cornet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: metasm
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Yoann GUILLOT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://metasm.cr0.org/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description : cross
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 10:50:15 +0200, Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Or, if you prefer a GUI application with out of the box support for
>> most mail clients, try reportbug-ng.
>
> My major problem with reportbug-ng was that is is very hard to
> con
35 matches
Mail list logo
