Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am Freitag 20 Juli 2007 17:47 schrieb Russ Allbery:
>> So in addition to having a --with-krb5 flag specifying the paths to the
>> libraries, I also need to add a --without-* flag for every Kerberos
>> implementation that I support which disables probin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
* Package name: qfsm
Version : 0.44
Upstream Author : Stefan Duffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://qfsm.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/20/07 17:52, Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
[snip]
>
> The major problem with the current system, is that it requires that
> the reporter has access to a mail server, if they want to use the more
> easier variant by using reportbug script. their other
On 7/21/07, Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
port 25 blocking may be circumvented using ssl(tls) access to smtp
server like one offered by gmail. Read the manpage of reportbug for its
command line options.
Many ISP now requests to use non-port 25 for outgoing mail. That may
be accomodated
On 2007-07-20, Carl Fürstenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know if there has been any discussions about some redesign of
> the system, to make it a bit more user friendly, but perhaps it's time
Please read up on the differences between 'user friendly' and 'beginner
friendly'
I am a user
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 12:52:43AM +0200, Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
> When I'm locking at the BTS, I sometimes get the feeling it was either
> designed a long time ago, or that it was designed by real hardcore
> developers. Not that it isn't effective, as when you have learned the
> whole system
When I'm locking at the BTS, I sometimes get the feeling it was either
designed a long time ago, or that it was designed by real hardcore
developers. Not that it isn't effective, as when you have learned the
whole system, you can query it pretty fast, but the threshold is
pretty steep.
I don't kn
On 20/07/07 at 10:22 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 02:13:26AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > Full build logs are available at
> > http://people.debian.org/~sesse/enriched-chroot/ -- look at the bottom to
> > find the differences. Note that these builds were ma
On 19/07/07 at 18:07 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Nico Golde wrote:
> > Do we need package descriptions anybody can understand even
> > without knowing anything about the topic or what?
>
> Compare the description for pssh as posted with the descriptions for
> what I assume are similar tools, cluste
>> This require some work from sender's side, how is using plain MUA<->ML
>> interaction. For things like Gmane or reportbug anti-spam rules are
>> customizable and known at least.
>
> While defending against spam is being long enough on user's side [0],
> why not to apply this little addition to s
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 06:50:03PM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> Could it be, that you are now filtering to strict? I could swear, that
> when I looked at the list yesterday I saw fillets-ng which had a new lib
> according to the log...
It seems fillets-ng was never completely built in the se
Am Freitag 20 Juli 2007 17:47 schrieb Russ Allbery:
> So in addition to having a --with-krb5 flag specifying the paths to the
> libraries, I also need to add a --without-* flag for every Kerberos
> implementation that I support which disables probing for that
> implementation? That's kind of lame,
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 11:37:23PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 19 juillet 2007 à 09:02 -0700, Andrew Pollock a écrit :
> > Description : Parallel versions of the OpenSSH tools
>
> > These tools are good for controlling large collections of nodes, where
> > faster
> > alterna
Hi!
* Steinar H. Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070720 10:22]:
[..]
> Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>ht
Could it be, that you are now filtering to strict? I could swear, that
when I looked at the list yesterday I saw fillets-ng which had a new lib
according to the log...
You still
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: softflowd
Version : 0.9.8
Upstream Author : Damien Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> et.al.
* URL : http://www.mindrot.org/projects/softflowd
* License : BSD
Description : Flow-based network traffic analyser
Quoti
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libperl6-junction-perl
Version : 1.3
Upstream Author : Carl Franks
* URL : http://www.cpan.org/
* License : Perl (GPL/Artistic)
Programming Lang: Per
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I really don't think that declaring the majority of packages in Debian
>> buggy in this fashion is viable, particularly when nearly all packages
>> in Debian will not benefit from this. My guess is that
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I don't know of any Kerberos software, among dozens of packages, that
>> works this way. This simply isn't how multiple Kerberos
>> implementations have ever been handled; they all just check for Heimda
Gabor Gombas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ideally everything should use libgssapi2 (or some other mechglue
> implementation) and nothing should build directly aginst the
> Kerberos-specific GSSAPI implementations.
Your statement is true for software that really doesn't care what GSS-API
mechanis
X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Owner: Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: jfreereport
Version : 0.9.1
Upstream Authors :
dkincade
Dave Waddell
ELassad
Gretchen Moran
Schoemer, Joerg
Michael D'
On Thursday 19 July 2007 15:08, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho wrote:
> Telaen is a web-based e-mail client written in PHP. It is fast, lean and
> simple, but also extremely powerful.
This seems a bit buzzworded to me: "extremely" powerful? Yet "fast", "lean"
and "simple"? A more factual description of
Tim Brown wrote:
> Description : Directory & file brute forcing, with a twist
>
> DirBuster is a multi threaded java application designed to brute force
> directories and files names on web/application servers. Often is the case
> now of what looks like a web server in a state of default in
Dear Sir,
We learned your information from internet and now writing to you for the
possibility of business cooperation.
KingTech Mould is a professional Mould maker, Designer and Molding factory
in China, which is certified and committed to the comprehensive ISO 9001
quality system standar
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 11:02:39AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Now, I'm willing to lead the way for Kerberos packages going forward, I
> guess, if I can figure out a good way to do that, but I don't know how
> that configure logic would even work or what those --with flags would look
> like. The
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> I find that "From other Branch bugs" label confusing, not to mention
> what an ordinary user would make of it. When, exactly, is a bug
> categorised as "From other Branch"? It's not just when the package
> has been removed, from what I've seen, I think.
On Friday 20 July 2007 12:19, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > It would be nice, I think, if the BTS would automatically notice
> > when a package has been removed from unstable and annotate the bugs
> > appropriately.
>
> It actually already does this; see
>
>
[this seemed to have been eaten; resending]
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Stefan Fritsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-18 18:31]:
> > is it really a good idea to close the bug reports while the packages
> > are still in stable? Shouldn't they be left open for reference until
> >
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 07:25:21AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> I just completed the translation of a few Hamradio packages and, wow,
> the hamradio jargon they use is about as intelligible as Sanskrit to
> me...:-). It even sometimes takes ages before one can *understand*
> that the package d
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> It would be nice, I think, if the BTS would automatically notice
> when a package has been removed from unstable and annotate the bugs
> appropriately.
It actually already does this; see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=exim;dist=unsta
hi
Mark Brown ha scritto:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 11:23:53AM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
>
>> The problem was due to a subtle change in zlib1g: in newer versions, the
>> compressed output has 0x02 instead of 0x00 at the 10th byte (that is in
>> the header). This change occurred somewhere between ve
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 18:31, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Bugs that affect the newer upstream versions could be cloned, of
> course.
Bugs that affect the newer upstream versions should already have been cloned
or filed against both packages from the beginning. That doesn't always
happen, of cours
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 21:47, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Stefan Fritsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-18 18:31]:
> > is it really a good idea to close the bug reports while the packages
> > are still in stable? Shouldn't they be left open for reference until
> > etch is at least oldstable?
>
> I
Steinar H. Gunderson schrieb:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 12:31:57AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>> Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>knetworkmanager
>>>kpowersave
>> These two are affected because of unsermake being installed and so the
>> build fails completely.
>
> Define "fails compl
On Friday 20 July 2007 00:31, Michael Biebl wrote:
> These two are affected because of unsermake being installed and so the
> build fails completely.
> unsermake though is scheduled/requested to be removed [1].
> So please, don't file bugs for these two packages or better, wait until
> unsermake ha
Hi Fabian,
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 09:52:03PM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> finally (and thanks to Lioc Minier a.o.) the new upstream version 1.0.0
> of the libquicktime library has made it into Debian unstable.
> The library involves an ABI change relative to its successor 0.9.7 and
> had its
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 02:13:26AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> Full build logs are available at
> http://people.debian.org/~sesse/enriched-chroot/ -- look at the bottom to
> find the differences. Note that these builds were made some time ago, so they
> might not be 100% up-to-date -- I wi
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> I would much prefer to see a new control field that explicitly lists
>>> the supported features. We're going to need that *anyway* for any
>>> feature that
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 12:31:57AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>knetworkmanager
>>kpowersave
> These two are affected because of unsermake being installed and so the
> build fails completely.
Define "fails completely". The build creates a .deb, it just
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> If the libraries have different names then there should be
>> --with/--without switches possible for configure.
>
> (I'm also upstream for several of these packages.)
>
> I don't know of any Kerberos s
39 matches
Mail list logo
