> > - automatic installation of recommends like aptitude
>
> I want to check how this will affect d-i. The Recommends tree is still
> fairly hairy/unrefined and can result in a lot of crud being pulled in.
> (See #388290. Though having them installed by default would certianly
> add pressure to fi
* From: Justin Emmanuel
* Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 10:55:01 +0100
Hallo, Justin. Hope, you are still here.
> I am brand new to this mailing list, I joined it because I had an idea
> that I would like to have considered. Moving apt to a relational
> database, for several reasons.
>
> Based on a rela
I've been using Gmail and thought you might like to try it out. Here's
an invitation to create an account.
---
DebianTux23 has invited you to open a free Gmail account.
To accept this invitation and register for your account, v
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 09:54:16AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 07 Jun 2007, Michael Vogt wrote:
> > I plan to do an apt 0.7.2 upload for sid this weekend. It's a big merge
> > of the version in debian/experimental and the version in Ubuntu.
>
> Big thanks and kudos for your w
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 06:21:03AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 11:36:57AM +0100, Luis Matos wrote:
> > Sex, 2007-06-08 às 09:58 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine escreveu:
> > > On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 09:24:48AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jun 07, 20
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 04:58:04PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070523 11:00]:
> > Could someone make a page with GPLv2-only software, I'd be curious what
> > would be affected. Maybe the easiest way would be to dump and format a
> > page on the Wiki so that it
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: cultivation
Version : 7
Upstream Author : Jason Rohrer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://cultivation.sourceforge.net/
* License : Public domain
Programming Lang: C++
De
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 06:21:03AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > How is what you describe different from what cron-apt already does?
>
> That's precisely why I asked for details about this feature :-)
>
> Anyhow, what I'm missing from cron-a
[Andreas Tille]
> While I like your idea in principle I wonder whether it is
> really reasonable to put this information into a conffile.
Not sure about that. My main point is that the content of
/etc/debian_version should be changed independently of the changes
done to base-files, and thus be s
On 08-Jun-07, 03:35 (CDT), Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When that is said, I believe it is a good idea to split the Debian
> version into its own package like RedHat do it, to make sure the
> version can be updated without updating all the other files in
> base-files. This wou
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 09:33:26AM +, Peter Makholm wrote:
> But I have no idea where these information come from. According to
> /etc/debian_version I'm running'lenny/sid'.
This was discussed previously in the thread...
> Hmmm, lsb_release seems to parse 'apt-cache policy' and hardcodes the
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 06:32:03AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> Well, if you run stable (without third-party sources), that is all you
> will get along with the occasionaly point release. Of course, if you
> are keeping up with security updates, then point releases won't normally
> affect yo
Sex, 2007-06-08 às 06:21 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez escreveu:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 11:36:57AM +0100, Luis Matos wrote:
> > Sex, 2007-06-08 às 09:58 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine escreveu:
> > > On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 09:24:48AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 1
Sex, 2007-06-08 às 13:01 +0200, Gabor Gombas escreveu:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 11:36:57AM +0100, Luis Matos wrote:
>
> > i have 2 servers that i only login for apt-get update && apt-get upgrade
> > -y, they are running sarge (yet) and only install security upgrades.
> >
> > These 2 server will
> How is what you describe different from what cron-apt already does?
I'd suggest looking at the source of unnattended-upgrades. It checks if
the package to be upgraded would trigger a conffile-changed question. If
it does not, the upgrade is done, since it won't need manual
intervention. If it wo
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 11:36:57AM +0100, Luis Matos wrote:
> i have 2 servers that i only login for apt-get update && apt-get upgrade
> -y, they are running sarge (yet) and only install security upgrades.
>
> These 2 server will not be put in danger by making the update && upgrade
> in an autono
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 12:26:50PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 06:21:03AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > How is what you describe different from what cron-apt already does?
>
> That's precisely why I asked for details about this feature :-)
>
> Anyhow, what I'
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 06:21:03AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> How is what you describe different from what cron-apt already does?
That's precisely why I asked for details about this feature :-)
Anyhow, what I'm missing from cron-apt is the ability to perform
automatic upgrades only for st
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 11:36:57AM +0100, Luis Matos wrote:
> Sex, 2007-06-08 às 09:58 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine escreveu:
> > On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 09:24:48AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 12:59:38AM +0200, Michael Vogt wrote:
> > > > The big new stuff is:
>
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Everybody can change this to something else. Isn't it better
> to implement a
>/usr/bin/debian-release
> that contains an option to get the real version number that
> is hard coded anywhere if /etc/debian_version was changed?
Why not just use lsb_r
Sex, 2007-06-08 às 09:58 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine escreveu:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 09:24:48AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 12:59:38AM +0200, Michael Vogt wrote:
> > > The big new stuff is:
> > > - support for unattended installing security upgrades (via the
>
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> This is what a patch Loïc proposed to gnome-vfs does through a hook
> system, but I don't like to add such complex things that have an impact
> on a dozen packages to workaround a bug in a single package.
What do you find complex? The "hook system"
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ rpm -qf /etc/redhat-release
redhat-release-5Client-5.0.0.9
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ rpm -ql redhat-release
/etc/issue
/etc/issue.net
/etc/pki/rpm-gpg
/etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora
/etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 08:58:08PM +0100, Jonny Lamb wrote:
> thought this was some kind of joke at first. The short description at
> least surely should be something like "Strategy game similar to Pipe
> Mania and Pipe Dream" (I am pretending it is a strategy game), or
> something along those lin
[Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña]
> Bastille uses it to distinguish releases. There seems to be others:
Using /etc/debian_version is not a good idea. I know this because I
tried to let popularity-contest collect its content to see what
version of Debian were in use. Here is the list of values fr
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 09:24:48AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 12:59:38AM +0200, Michael Vogt wrote:
> > The big new stuff is:
> > - support for unattended installing security upgrades (via the
> > unattended-upgrades package and the apt cronjob)
>
> This sounds ju
Le jeudi 07 juin 2007 à 17:38 +0200, Andreas Barth a écrit :
> Why don't you check for updates on another file as well, and just touch
> this?
In which case it is enough to check for updates
in /usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules. I have already provided a gstreamer
patch that checks it, but it seems t
Le jeudi 07 juin 2007 à 20:44 +0200, Pierre Habouzit a écrit :
> symbol visibility support in gcc is not that old, and many upstream
> don't use it (yet).
libtool has supported -export-symbols since 1998 and
-export-symbols-regex since 1999.
> For them there is many many many private symbols in
28 matches
Mail list logo
