Work-needing packages report for May 11, 2007

2007-05-10 Thread wnpp
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the last week. Total number of orphaned packages: 385 (new: 5) Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 88 (new: 1) Total number of packages requeste

RFP Linux-Debian Chat Messenger Retroshare (serverless IM)

2007-05-10 Thread Conny Kramer
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Hello can you package it into the debian distro? Thanks Original-Nachricht Datum: Thu, 10 May 2007 20:51:01 +0200 Von: "Conny Kramer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],

Re: where to find linux-kbuild-2.6.21?

2007-05-10 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Ludovic Rousseau said: > Le 10.05.2007, à 00:25:32, Stephen Gran a écrit: > > > > I have always just asked them on IRC on #debian-kernel. > > Have you done this time again? > If not, could you? (I do not use IRC.) I have now. --

Please remove 'progsreiserfs' from the Archive

2007-05-10 Thread José Luis Tallón
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal After a full release cycle, it is high time we did. Having nobody actually using 'progsreiserfs' ---the installations reported by popcon are certainly due to mistaken installations looking for 'reiserfsprogs'---, and given that upstream dissapeared

Re: Announce: DebianArt.org

2007-05-10 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 09 May 2007, Gustavo Franco wrote: >> I don't think that it will be accepeted as art.debian.org though, not >> ugly enough yet. > What does that mean ? Usually the web services on debian.org hosts provide access to quite ugly pages. See -www fo

Re: where to find linux-kbuild-2.6.21?

2007-05-10 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
Le 10.05.2007, à 00:25:32, Stephen Gran a écrit: > This one time, at band camp, Ludovic Rousseau said: > > linux-image-2.6.21 is not yet available in unstable but is available > > from the snapshot server as described in [1]. > > > > I imagine that linux 2.6.21 is not the priority of the kernel te

Re: packages newer in Ubuntu than in Debian

2007-05-10 Thread Bart Martens
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 19:47 +0200, Amir Tabatabaei wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 08:01 +0200, Bart Martens wrote: > > Should be better now. If you still see false positives, then I'm very > > interested. > > There is no gaim in unstable any more, but its renamed to pidgin. At this mome

Re: packages newer in Ubuntu than in Debian (reduced false positives)

2007-05-10 Thread Bart Martens
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 18:07 +1000, Paul Wise wrote: > On 5/10/07, Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Should be better now. > > http://people.debian.org/~bartm/borg/outdated.html > > Excellent. For even more usefulness points, this could be integrated > into qa.d.o/developer.php - perha

Re: packages newer in Ubuntu than in Debian (reduced false positives)

2007-05-10 Thread Bart Martens
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 09:51 +0200, "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" wrote: > Hi, > > There's at least one false positive left. See "picard" package. > > Regards, Adam. I verified whether "picard" [0] would be a false positive on this list [1]. It has no version in Unstable and it has no version in the N

Re: packages newer in Ubuntu than in Debian

2007-05-10 Thread Amir Tabatabaei
Hi, On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 08:01 +0200, Bart Martens wrote: > Should be better now. If you still see false positives, then I'm very > interested. There is no gaim in unstable any more, but its renamed to pidgin. Regards, Amir PS: Sorry for the PM. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Fixing up SELinux reference policy for Debian

2007-05-10 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Thu, 10 May 2007 09:13:40 -0500, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I am attaching the local.te file below for comment; some of > this should probably go into the refpolicy package, and, eventually, > upstream. Would be nice to actually append the file. m

Fixing up SELinux reference policy for Debian

2007-05-10 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi folks, I have started in earnest to try and get the current reference policy to the point where I can create a headless build virtual machine running strict policy in enforcing mode. At this point, I have a local.te file that enables me to log in, either as root or as myself, moun

Re: DELIVERY REPORTS ABOUT YOUR E-MAIL

2007-05-10 Thread luigilamonaca
- The following is an automated response - to your message generated on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Grazie per averci dedicato un po' del Vostro prezioso tempo. La nostra redazione leggerà e pubblicherà i comunicati pervenuti dopo averli vagliati. V'informiamo che Radio Città Commu

Re: Bourne shell assistance needed for Bug #422909

2007-05-10 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Junichi Uekawa [Thu, 10 May 2007 09:00:27 +0900]: > I think you are looking for > set -o pipefail > in bash. Note this is bash-specific. If the script is set -e, Frans' solution is the most straightforward way. Cheers, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.c

Re: packages newer in Ubuntu than in Debian (reduced false positives)

2007-05-10 Thread Paul Wise
On 5/10/07, Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Should be better now. http://people.debian.org/~bartm/borg/outdated.html Excellent. For even more usefulness points, this could be integrated into qa.d.o/developer.php - perhaps as extra columns in the watch area that would be initially hidde

Re: packages newer in Ubuntu than in Debian (reduced false positives)

2007-05-10 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bart Martens a écrit : > On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 08:14 +0200, Bart Martens wrote: >> On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 23:16 -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote: >>> [Bart Martens] I've thought about adding an column for the versions in experimental, but that is

Re: Announce: DebianArt.org

2007-05-10 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Wed, 09 May 2007, Gustavo Franco wrote: > I don't think that it will be accepeted as art.debian.org though, not > ugly enough yet. What does that mean ? The service is pretty new, it's quite usual to start its life as art.debian.net. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Premier livre français sur Deb