Re: spam from bugs.debian.org

2007-04-24 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 06:04, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: > Of late, I have been seeing a lot of spam from bugs.debian.org . I > never got this many spam emails from BTS. Has something changed? How > does everyone deal with this (I mean other than filtering)? Yes, both the admins of the BTS a

spam from bugs.debian.org

2007-04-24 Thread Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
Of late, I have been seeing a lot of spam from bugs.debian.org . I never got this many spam emails from BTS. Has something changed? How does everyone deal with this (I mean other than filtering)? hth raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/ http://malayamaarutham.

Bug#54138: Immense, gains, in germany.

2007-04-24 Thread Brice otto
kicked -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Feature request for GnuPG crypted Debian packages

2007-04-24 Thread Pierre THIERRY
Scribit Michelle Konzack dies 24/04/2007 hora 16:40: > I would suggest to add a new header like "Crypted: " and then > crypt the data.tar.gz (in the Debian package). I think you're targetting the wrong layer of the system. If many packages contain so much sensitive data, it would be easier to encr

Re: Mandatory -dbg packages for libraries?

2007-04-24 Thread Pierre THIERRY
Scribit Daniel Jacobowitz dies 23/04/2007 hora 16:19: > Another possible way to change glibc would be to have libc6-dbg > contain full debug symbols, libc6-dev contain -g1 symbols only, and > have the -dbg divert the -dev. Why not do that for every library? Curiously, Pierre -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug#370592: RFA: tikiwiki -- groupware and content management system

2007-04-24 Thread Daniel Baumann
Marcus Better wrote: > I am looking for someone to take over maintenance of Tikiwiki. In case a non-DD maintainer wants to take over tikiwiki, I can keep sponsoring the package if desired. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I

Re: Mandatory -dbg packages for libraries?

2007-04-24 Thread Russ Allbery
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2007, Josselin Mouette wrote: >> Apport sends complete core dumps, which is a very bad idea. The dumps >> can be huge (for desktop applications they often grow beyond 200MB) and >> they can contain gazillions of sensitive information. > B

Re: Mandatory -dbg packages for libraries?

2007-04-24 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 14:40 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2007, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > Apport sends complete core dumps, which is a very bad idea. The dumps > > can be huge (for desktop applications they often grow beyond 200MB) and > > they can contain gazillions of sensitive in

Re: Disable ipv4 fragmentation

2007-04-24 Thread Steve Langasek
None of the lists you've sent this to are appropriate forums for this question; redirecting to debian-user. On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 05:39:53PM +, J HU wrote: > Dear experts, > I'm working with sockets in a debian with a version of kernel 2.6.x, and > I'd like to disable the fragmentation of

ITP: popstation -- A tool to convert PSX iso to EPB

2007-04-24 Thread Gaëtan
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist license :GPL V2 This tool allow you to convert your Sony PSX iso/bin files to Sony PSP eboot. The generated EBP file with popstation must be run at least under 3.02OE firmware (without compression) or under 3.03OE firmware (with compression). Homepage: http://www

Disable ipv4 fragmentation

2007-04-24 Thread J HU
Dear experts, I'm working with sockets in a debian with a version of kernel 2.6.x, and I'd like to disable the fragmentation of the ipv4 introduce. I have read that there was the option of modified the file /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_always_defrag but it doesn't exist. So I'm totally lost and I need

Re: Proposal for a new CDD sub-project: Debian4Business

2007-04-24 Thread Luis Matos
Ter, 2007-04-24 às 16:44 +0200, Michelle Konzack escreveu: > Hello Arjan and *, > > Am 2007-04-18 15:24:36, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > > I would like to start a new sub-project called Debian4Business or perhaps > > Debian-Office.I have a slight preference for the first name, but this is > >

Re: Proposal for a new CDD sub-project: Debian4Business

2007-04-24 Thread Luis Matos
Ter, 2007-04-24 às 16:44 +0200, Michelle Konzack escreveu: > Hello Arjan and *, > > Am 2007-04-18 15:24:36, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > > I would like to start a new sub-project called Debian4Business or perhaps > > Debian-Office.I have a slight preference for the first name, but this is > >

Re: Mandatory -dbg packages for libraries?

2007-04-24 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Dienstag 24 April 2007 14:12 schrieb Josselin Mouette: > Using a central server for symbol lookup like Ben proposed looks like a > better idea. It needs gdb to be adapted or wrapped to access them > correctly, though. You can't do offline debugging with a central server. Unless you are always-o

Bug#420793: ITP: junit4 -- JUnit regression test framework for Java

2007-04-24 Thread Florian Weimer
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: junit4 Version : 4.3.1 Upstream Author : Erich Gamma, Kent Beck * URL : http://www.junit.org/ * License : CPL Programming Lang: Java Description : JUnit regression

Re: Mandatory -dbg packages for libraries?

2007-04-24 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Le mardi 24 avril 2007 à 12:58 +0200, Reinhard Tartler a écrit : >> Ben Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > Installing debugging symbols for all binaries involved in a crash >> > seems... heavyweight. I would expect the user to want to get

Re: Mandatory -dbg packages for libraries?

2007-04-24 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 02:40:22PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2007, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > Apport sends complete core dumps, which is a very bad idea. The dumps > > can be huge (for desktop applications they often grow beyond 200MB) and > > they can contain gazillions of sensi

Re: Mandatory -dbg packages for libraries? (and API docs too)

2007-04-24 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 09:13:18AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 04:27:34PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > > On 23-Apr-07, 15:51 (CDT), Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I think that all libraries - without exception - must come with some > > > > >

Re: Proposal for a new CDD sub-project: Debian4Business

2007-04-24 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello Arjan and *, Am 2007-04-18 15:24:36, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > I would like to start a new sub-project called Debian4Business or perhaps > Debian-Office.I have a slight preference for the first name, but this is > discussable of course. I am open... > I have a small company, that pro

Feature request for GnuPG crypted Debian packages

2007-04-24 Thread Michelle Konzack
Package: dpkg Version: 1.10.28 Severity: wishlist => I am CC'ing this message to for discusion. <= Dear dpkg Developers and Maintainers, I am Debian GNU/Linux Consultant in Strasbourg/France and building my own Debian-CD's for installation at my customers. Those CD's contain beside th

Re: Proposal for a new CDD sub-project: Debian4Business

2007-04-24 Thread Matthew McGuire
Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 09:17:38AM -0400, Matthew McGuire a écrit : > >> a single tasksel system does sound nice, but it makes building the >> iso images for the installers impossible. If the user can select an >> essentially infinite number of tasks from the one interface

Re: Linux/Debian documentation suggestion

2007-04-24 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2007-04-17 20:25:34, schrieb Glenn Moeller-Holst: > Hi NG Mailinglist! > Purposes: > *When "I" is in the catalog "/var/log" - what commands can I use here? 1) What is "I"? 2) /vat/log is what it is. A log directory. > *Which commands is occluded by others at "/var/log"? ??? > *If I deinsta

Re: Bug#388701: Why Beryl has just four packages?

2007-04-24 Thread Alok G. Singh
On 24 Apr 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > What don't you put a personal server while we wait for them? or in > experimental? (a personal server would be better). If you just want a packaged beryl, the Beryl project have packaged it. deb http://debian.beryl-project.org etch main deb-src http://d

Re: Proposal for a new CDD sub-project: Debian4Business

2007-04-24 Thread Matthew McGuire
Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Joey Hess wrote: > >> Andreas Tille wrote: >>> Yes, you are right and I'm even doing this in the med-common package. >>> But I do not really regard this as a really nice solution if those >>> extra tasks are mixed with the default Debian tasks. >> >> Note

Re: Proposal for a new CDD sub-project: Debian4Business

2007-04-24 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 09:17:38AM -0400, Matthew McGuire a écrit : > a single tasksel system does sound nice, but it makes building the > iso images for the installers impossible. If the user can select an > essentially infinite number of tasks from the one interface then > the installer would re

Re: Mandatory -dbg packages for libraries?

2007-04-24 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 02:12:39PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le mardi 24 avril 2007 à 12:58 +0200, Reinhard Tartler a écrit : > > Ben Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Installing debugging symbols for all binaries involved in a crash > > > seems... heavyweight. I would expect

Re: Mandatory -dbg packages for libraries?

2007-04-24 Thread Loïc Minier
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Apport sends complete core dumps, which is a very bad idea. The dumps > can be huge (for desktop applications they often grow beyond 200MB) and > they can contain gazillions of sensitive information. But Apport is written already, and it's also the

Re: Mandatory -dbg packages for libraries?

2007-04-24 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 24 avril 2007 à 12:58 +0200, Reinhard Tartler a écrit : > Ben Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Installing debugging symbols for all binaries involved in a crash > > seems... heavyweight. I would expect the user to want to get on with > > his or her work at this point. > > > >

Re: patches.ubuntu.com and the Debian PTS derivatives

2007-04-24 Thread Scott James Remnant
On Sun, 2007-04-22 at 23:30 -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote: > On 4/2/07, Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As some of you may have noticed, the patches.ubuntu.com website and > > equivalent mailing of changes to the Debian PTS and ubuntu-patches > > mailing list has been offline, or

RFA: tikiwiki -- groupware and content management system

2007-04-24 Thread Marcus Better
retitle 370592 RFA: tikiwiki -- groupware and content management system thanks I am looking for someone to take over maintenance of Tikiwiki. The package works nicely and does not take much time to maintain. However I don't use it anymore, and also I'm a bit frustrated with the lack of progress

Re: Mandatory -dbg packages for libraries?

2007-04-24 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Ben Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Installing debugging symbols for all binaries involved in a crash > seems... heavyweight. I would expect the user to want to get on with > his or her work at this point. > > Wouldn't it be better - in terms of response rate - to take a > "minidump" (al

Re: UNSUSCRIBE

2007-04-24 Thread Luke Crooks
On 19/04/07, Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 07:24:53AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote: > On Tuesday 17 April 2007 20.51:16 Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote: > > man procmailrc > > On gmail? > gmail does support POP. Regards, -Roberto It does, because im using it

Re: Mandatory -dbg packages for libraries?

2007-04-24 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 10:37 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le dimanche 22 avril 2007 à 20:39 +0100, Neil Williams a écrit : > > I'd like to see all library source packages having a minimum of 4 > > binary packages required by Policy: the SONAME, the -dev, the -dbg and > > a -doc package. (Librar

Re: Making my gnome theme as default theme

2007-04-24 Thread Indraveni
After adding these lines also, i cound't see my gnome theme as default one. Any other ideas please. Thanks & Regards, Indraveni K, Project Engineer, CDAC - Chennai, INDIA. - Original Message From: Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: debian-devel@lists.debi

Bug#420691: ITP: audacious-plugins-ugly -- Unsupported plugins for audacious

2007-04-24 Thread Le_Vert
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: audacious-plugins-ugly Version : 1.3.0 Upstream Author : Audacious Dev Team * URL : http://audacious-media-player.org/Main_Page * License : GPL Programming Lang

Re: Mandatory -dbg packages for libraries? (and API docs too)

2007-04-24 Thread Neil Williams
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:32:46 -0400 Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Neil Williams wrote: > > I chose Debian as a development platform for my own reasons and my > > decision was "not deemed to be wise" in the eyes of some of my > > upstream colleagues. As the newbie to that particular team, I

Re: Mandatory -dbg packages for libraries? (and API docs too)

2007-04-24 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 04:27:34PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > On 23-Apr-07, 15:51 (CDT), Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I think that all libraries - without exception - must come with some > > > > API documentation and the docs should be as complete and as accurate > > > >