Re: Need help with MySQL upgrade tests on 2.4 kernel

On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 02:44:33AM +0200, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote: > El sáb, 07-04-2007 a las 12:54 -0700, Steve Langasek escribió: > > On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 03:39:11PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 12:28:13PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > > Isn't this on

Re: Need help with MySQL upgrade tests on 2.4 kernel

El sáb, 07-04-2007 a las 12:54 -0700, Steve Langasek escribió: > On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 03:39:11PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 12:28:13PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > Isn't this only reported against the version in sid, which is not included > > > in etch? > >

Re: merkel.debian.org down?

Hi, On Sat Apr 07, 2007 at 17:29:48 -0400, Bryan Donlan wrote: > Hi, > > Is there any news on the merkel.debian.org downtime? This also stalls > apt-listbugs for a while on every package upgrade attempt. I tried > searching the list archives for d-d and d-d-a, but saw nothing about > it. Yes, m

merkel.debian.org down?

Hi, Is there any news on the merkel.debian.org downtime? This also stalls apt-listbugs for a while on every package upgrade attempt. I tried searching the list archives for d-d and d-d-a, but saw nothing about it. Thanks, Bryan Donlan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subje

Re: Poll: Anybody using debpool?

On Friday 06 April 2007 14:11, Free Ekanayaka wrote: > |--==> Andreas Fester writes: > AF> "me too" ;) > > Count me in as well :) Great! > >>I'd like to suggest, then, that a project be started on Alioth, let's > >>say "saving-debpool" or "debpool-2g". Or anything that is better. :-) > > I

Re: Need help with MySQL upgrade tests on 2.4 kernel

On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 03:39:11PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 12:28:13PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Isn't this only reported against the version in sid, which is not included > > in etch? > > Etch is the last Debian release that supports upgrades from 2.4 kernel

Re: Need help with MySQL upgrade tests on 2.4 kernel

On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 12:28:13PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Isn't this only reported against the version in sid, which is not included > in etch? > > Etch is the last Debian release that supports upgrades from 2.4 kernels. > Lenny will not run on a 2.4 kernel. Perhaps the users should just

Re: Need help with MySQL upgrade tests on 2.4 kernel

On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 04:06:32PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote: > Two users reported that a sarge->etch upgrade with a running 2.4 kernel > does not work because /usr/sbin/mysqld from the mysql-server-5.0 package > hangs and postinst never finishes. > I've just tried to reproduce it myself but

Re: Need help with MySQL upgrade tests on 2.4 kernel

On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 04:06:32PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote: > Two users reported that a sarge->etch upgrade with a running 2.4 kernel > does not work because /usr/sbin/mysqld from the mysql-server-5.0 package > hangs and postinst never finishes. > > I've just tried to reproduce it myself bu

Bug#418184: ITP: geotiff -- the GeoTIFF library

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Debian GIS Project * Package name: geotiff Version : 1.2.3 Upstream Author : Frank Warmerdam et al. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://geotiff.maptools.org/ * License : MIT/X like Programming Lang: C Description :

Re: MySql broken on older 486 and other cpuid less CPUs. Does this qualify as RC?

On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 07:46:35PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > Thanks, I added those conflicts (along with a few others) in x11-common > 1:7.1.0-18. Unfortunately, it didn't make it to etch r0 :/ Sounds good. I remember a while ago having a problem upgrading a newer machine, and the package f

Re: MySql broken on older 486 and other cpuid less CPUs. Does this qualify as RC?

On Sat, Apr 7, 2007 at 13:31:00 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 01:24:06AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > Do you know the exact name of the old package that caused this problem? > > I believe they were: > > communicator-smotif-477 > navigator-smotif-477 > > Both from

Re: MySql broken on older 486 and other cpuid less CPUs. Does this qualify as RC?

On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 01:24:06AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > Do you know the exact name of the old package that caused this problem? I believe they were: communicator-smotif-477 navigator-smotif-477 Both from woody (3.0) non-free. Certainly both include /usr/X11R6/bin in them. -- Len Soren

Предложение перевозок

Грузоперевозки и доставка товаров. Неформальное объединение частных наёмников "gruzodav" Осуществляем оперативное предоставление автотранспорта для осуществления грузоперевозок по Санкт-Петербургу и области. Позвонив к нам Вы сможете получить исчерпывающую инфор

Re: hunting for Linux developer

Alle 14:05, sabato 7 aprile 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: > Hi everyone, > > *Wanted* Linux Developer I guess debian-jobs@lists.debian.org is more appropriate for this. Thanks. -- Luca Brivio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Need help with MySQL upgrade tests on 2.4 kernel

Hello Two users reported that a sarge->etch upgrade with a running 2.4 kernel does not work because /usr/sbin/mysqld from the mysql-server-5.0 package hangs and postinst never finishes. I've just tried to reproduce it myself but kernel 2.4 dislikes my SATA controller and I cannot get it to boot.

hunting for Linux developer

Hi everyone, *Wanted* Linux Developer Linux developer wanted in Unique United Oy. The project involves software development for Nokia Internet tablet (like Nokia 770 and Nokia 800) device. Programming competencies of interest: - Linux (Debian) programming - GTK - MAEMO platform - porting a

Re: RFO: duplicity

On Sat, Apr 7, 2007 at 13:49:20 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > Can you please file an ITA about this into the BTS? Or if you cannot ^^^ That would be RFA. > maintain it for the time being, even an "O:"? > > This way, this mail will not be

Re: RFO: duplicity

On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 07:50:28PM +0200, Martin Wuertele wrote: > Hi! > > Since I hardly use it myself and I currently have less time for debian > due to job change duplicity is up for adoption. > > I have some patches that need a bit of adjustment closing most of the > open bugs but I currently