Scribit Samuel Mimram dies 22/03/2007 hora 18:10:
> * Package name: why
That's great! I had begun to play a bit with why, but having it as an
official Debian package will make it easier. As I'm beginning to do some
packaging, if you ever need it, I'd gladly help (packaging a new
upstream, tria
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 05:27:35PM -0300, Rodrigo Tavares wrote:
> I created one package for architeture i686, in control
> file.
>
> # dpkg -i pacote-1.1.6.i686.deb
> dpkg: error processing pacote-1.1.6.i686.deb
> (--install):
> package architecture (i686) does not match system
> (i386)
> Errors
Am I right in thinking that normal d-i installations ensure that at
least one primary mirror is selected (or at least strongly advise that
one primary should exist)?
No
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Which I learned by this example and which makes me wonder whether
> there is absolutely no way out to enforce overriding CFLAGS.
It is possible, but really a bad idea. See "override" in make. I
really recommend you don't use it.
> This makes no rea
Hello,
I created one package for architeture i686, in control
file.
Se the below commands:
uname -m
i686
# dpkg -s libc6-i686
Package: libc6-i686
Status: install ok installed
Priority: extra
Section: libs
Installed-Size: 2476
Maintainer: GNU Libc Maintainers
Architecture: i386
When I try to i
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007, [iso-8859-1] Loïc Minier wrote:
Actually, the CFLAGS passed to the top-level $(MAKE) are overriding
everything.
Which I learned by this example and which makes me wonder whether
there is absolutely no way out to enforce overriding CFLAGS.
I suggest you either try to set -
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 10:47:00 +0200
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Parse sources.list. Many people have multiple suites in there and you
> will want to add multiple entries then.
apt-cache policy already covers that output and it is easier to parse -
the code offered by Ben Hutc
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the vegastrike suite of packages. The data
package is pretty big weighing in at ~150MB making it one of the larger
packages in Debian. It has a pretty good user base, and upstream is still
active. However, development is quite slow now-a-
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the chromium package. The game is dead upstrem,
but clearly still has a large set of users. It has recently been discovered
that some of the music is non-free and some of the sounds are
non-distributable. The issues are discussed in #385
Re: Stefano Zacchiroli 2007-04-02 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I share the feeling of "niceness" of the personal touch, but this isn't
> a technical reason, and the point of uniforming a timezone so that it's
> easier to compare dates among different changelog is definitely a valid
> one.
If we want to (
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 03:11:23PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I share the feeling of "niceness" of the personal touch, but this isn't
> a technical reason, and the point of uniforming a timezone so that it's
> easier to compare dates among different changelog is definitely a valid
> one.
I
Heya,
>> I fear that the IDE bus is not really hotplug friendly and that we
>> simply have no way to discover this automatically (hence the need of
>> a tool to ask for a rescan of the IDE bus by the kernel). But I'm
>> neither an hardware expert nor a kernel specialist, so I may be wrong.
>>
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 19:27:17 +
> Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On ti, 2007-04-03 at 16:28 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
>> With regards to Debian Policy, you need to read section 10.7.
>
> That's why I'm changing the existing method (w
Hi
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 02:21:48 -0500
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One of your ballots (msg00250) did pass the gpg check -- but
> you must have voted with the same ballot, since devotee says:
>Failure: The signature on the message, though valid, has been seen
>be
hi Lex,
Lex Hider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Hi,
> I've been discussing with some #fluendo people about their codecs not being
> compatible with etch (requires glibc 2.4+).
>
> Can anyone give a brief answer to why etch will be shipping the glibc at 2.3.
> I couldn't provide an explanation as
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I try to package a project that needs to add some include
> pathes to the existing default CFLAGS and thus I tried
> to patch a Makefile in one subdir to
> CFLAGS=$(CFLAGS) -I$(INCLUDEDIR)
> but I had to learn that the CFLAGS variable that i
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I fear that the IDE bus is not really hotplug friendly and that we
> simply have no way to discover this automatically (hence the need of
> a tool to ask for a rescan of the IDE bus by the kernel). But I'm
> neither an hardware expert nor a kernel spec
On Sun, 1 Apr 2007 22:02:18 +0200, Michal Čihař <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Maybe I read RFC 3156 wrong, but I think it says exactly what I
> sent:
> 6.1. RFC 1847 Encapsulation
>In [2], it is stated that the data is first signed as a
>multipart/signature body, and then encrypted to fo
18 matches
Mail list logo
