On ti, 2007-03-06 at 15:31 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > mdk2 is a tool designed to crash 802.11 wireless network.
...
> What's the non-black hat purpose of this tool?
The Debian Oracle is glad you asked! This is an important fashion
question: what headware should one ask when using each Debian
> irrelevant... the problem is really in the difference between:
if that is a problem at all since zdumps are the same for 2007 on sarge
and sid...
--
Yaroslav Halchenko
Research Assistant, Psychology Department, Rutgers-Newark
Student Ph.D. @ CS Dept. NJIT
Office: (973) 353-5440x263 | FWD: 8282
irrelevant... the problem is really in the difference between:
,-
| $> ssh $sarge TZ=US/Eastern date -d '"+168 hours"'
| Wed Mar 14 00:35:51 EDT 2007
| *$> ssh $sid TZ=US/Eastern date -d '"+168 hours"'
| Wed Mar 14 00:35:56 EDT 2007
|
| *$> ss
> Which time zone is "HST"?
> $ TZ=EST5EDT date
> Tue Mar 6 21:49:44 EST 2007
> $ TZ=EST5EDT date -d '+168 hours'
> Tue Mar 13 22:49:40 EDT 2007
> Looks OK to me. (If you say +N days that ends up at the same time of
> day local time.)
also as Luca Filipozzi pointed out to me sarge has proper tab
Ron Johnson writes:
> Hawaii ('Pacific/Honolulu)
IIRC Hawaii does not observe DST (DST makes even less sense in the tropics
than it does here).
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/06/07 20:51, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 21:19 -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>> Dear All,
>>
>> Please correct me (I hope someone will correct me) but sarge is not new
>> DST rules ready like [1] discusses or am I missing smth
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > If there are specific things about the BTS which you do not like, file
> > wishlist bugs or clarify existing wishlist bugs for them.
>
> Hi Don,
>
> Where to send the bug: debbugs or bugs.debian.org ?
Check both, send to either; I'll reassign/clone
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 21:19 -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Please correct me (I hope someone will correct me) but sarge is not new
> DST rules ready like [1] discusses or am I missing smth?
>
> up to date sarge box I have
>
> ,--
> | zaza[0] ~>date
I feel silly ;-)
that box was missing proposed-updates (had just security updates).
even so - the picture is the same - no DST update seems to be taking
place in the US states (eg TZ=US/Pacific)
,
| zaza[0] ~>date -d "+7 days"
| Tue Mar 13 16:28:29 HST 2007
| *zaza[0] ~>date
| Tue Mar 6 16:2
> If there are specific things about the BTS which you do not like, file
> wishlist bugs or clarify existing wishlist bugs for them.
Hi Don,
Where to send the bug: debbugs or bugs.debian.org ?
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
http://charles.plessy.org
Wako, Saitama, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Dear All,
Please correct me (I hope someone will correct me) but sarge is not new
DST rules ready like [1] discusses or am I missing smth?
up to date sarge box I have
,--
| zaza[0] ~>date
| Tue Mar 6 16:12:26 HST 2007
| *zaza[0] ~>date -d "+7 days"
| Tue Mar 13 16:1
> "Milan" == Milan P Stanic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 11:02:35AM +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
>> Some daemons _need_ to be started from /etc/rcS.d (udev for
>> example). Another good example is portmap for nfs. If you're mounting nfs
>> volumes over IPsec then, r
Bernd Zeimetz a écrit :
> Heya,
>
> actually I'm looking more for somebody who has an actual use-case for
> those plugins and is willing to test them with a recent version of gimp,
> I didn't even think about finishing the packages yet. The code is
> unmaintained for years, and the refocus under g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/06/07 14:58, Adam Cecile wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Adam Cecile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: mdk2
> Version : 0.0.0+v33
> Upstream Author : Pedro Larbig "ASPj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL
Benjamin Seidenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would suggest adding a word about the interface - is it a GUI or
> console program?
FLTK is a GUI toolkit.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Adam Cecile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: mdk2
Version : 0.0.0+v33
Upstream Author : Pedro Larbig "ASPj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://homepages.tu-darmstadt.de/~p_larbig/wlan/
* License : GPL, needs to be conf
On Tuesday 06 March 2007, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
AARGH! did it again, sorry all,
(me goes of to configure an outgoing filter to prevent doing this again)
--
Cheers, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
pgpC9lnG7XQuv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
Cheers, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
am-utils_6.1.5-3_nl.po
Description: application/gettext
pgpMZditTaZon.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi!
* Matthias Julius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070306 19:16]:
> Although this clutters up /etc they could be saved as *.dpkg-last or
> so. New packages' conffiles can be saved as *.dpkg-new just like dpkg
> currently does if one chooses not to install the new file. Before a
> new version is install
Steve Greenland wrote:
On 05-Mar-07, 15:12 (CST), Simon Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The packages are not DFSG-compliant: they contain the whole of the
software, with nothing removed, but the non-free stuff (missing in the
official .debs) is not re-distributable.
None of which is a prob
On Tue, 06 Mar 2007, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> And if your point is that the current BTS UI sucks, then well, yes I
> believe it, and it seems one of our DPL candidates thinks the same
As I've indicated to the DPL candidate who has mentioned this, and
I'll say again:
If there are specific things a
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 11:02:35AM +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
> > "Milan" == Milan P Stanic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Some daemons _need_ to be started from /etc/rcS.d (udev for
> example). Another good example is portmap for nfs. If you're mounting nfs
> volumes over IPsec then, racoo
Heya,
actually I'm looking more for somebody who has an actual use-case for
those plugins and is willing to test them with a recent version of gimp,
I didn't even think about finishing the packages yet. The code is
unmaintained for years, and the refocus under gimp 2 is more or less a
hack... I do
Joop Stakenborg wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Joop Stakenborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: fldigi
> Version : 1.30
> Upstream Author : David H. Freese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.w1hkj.com/Fldigi.html
> * License :
This question is better placed on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So, I am crossposting it there
Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> since I'm not only a geek but also a photographer and GIMP user I've
> decided to have a look at wnpp bug #398765 [1] and package the plugin
> [2]. While pack
sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 19:23 +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
>>
>> The implementation was not really difficult, the patch file
>> itself is 200 lines alltogether.
>
> not bad :) i have to admit i haven't looked at the patch.
>
>> > would be to see the difference
Quoting "cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So saying translators do it purely, or even mainly, for themselves is doing
> debian translators in general a disservice IMHO
Dang, everyone is looking for stuff to criticize something today...
But fine.. There ARE exeptions to any rul
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:46:40PM +0100, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
>> Quoting Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> > I'm not convinced at all that *funding* a manager would do any good to
>> > the project.
>>
>> If we already had a _good_ project manager in ou
Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 05:35:43PM +, Jon Dowland wrote:
>
> wow, I'm really amazed. For the KDE and Gnome teams (and I'm sure
> others did it as well) there was mails requesting help to triage bugs
> and so on (from january 2006). Reading this t
On 05-Mar-07, 15:12 (CST), Simon Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The packages are not DFSG-compliant: they contain the whole of the
> software, with nothing removed, but the non-free stuff (missing in the
> official .debs) is not re-distributable.
None of which is a problem for the copyright h
> > if not, then probably this patch indeed could be safely
> > deapplied I guess ;-)
> It might be better to do:
> --- channels.c~ 2007-03-04 21:01:58.0 +
> +++ channels.c2007-03-06 01:34:03.0 +
> @@ -2807,8 +2807,10 @@
> debug2
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 09:06:42AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> So to generalise, it seems that there is the choice between seeing
> repetitive work done imperfectly by beginners, or never done by
> experienced people who are busy doing something else. Definitely the way
> the contributors are su
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:46:40PM +0100, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> Quoting Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > I'm not convinced at all that *funding* a manager would do any good to
> > the project.
>
> If we already had a _good_ project manager in our ranks, don't you think
> they/he/s
On Tuesday 06 March 2007, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 08:05:08PM +0100, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
wrote:
> > --
> > Cheers, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
>
> I think you meant to send this to debian-l10n-nl, rather than -devel :)
indeed
* me smaks his own head
--
Cheers, cob
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 08:05:08PM +0100, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
>
> --
> Cheers, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
I think you meant to send this to debian-l10n-nl, rather than -devel :)
--
Home is where you have to wash the dishes.
-- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22
--
To UNSUB
35 matches
Mail list logo
