On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 10:57:51AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Is their a developer-accessible mirror (on a non-restricted host) of
> the archive maintenance which are in production, including (most of)
> the configuration?
> There used to be a mirror on merkel.debian.org, but it's no longer
> c
Hello, hello, who's your lady friend?
Stologirl Eolise Sbperm Laover Sxucks GNIGANTCOCK For Jcizz
There are certain moments when we might wish the future were built by men of
the past.Lawyers are like rhinoceroses: thick skinned, short-sighted, and
always ready to charge.
The beginning is the
On 1/28/07, Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10914 March 1977, Gustavo Franco wrote:
>> If you are applying for travel sponsorship, make sure you have entered
>> your full travel details and costs.
> Could you confirm that my form has enough information? I felt the lack
> of feedback o
On 10914 March 1977, Gustavo Franco wrote:
>> If you are applying for travel sponsorship, make sure you have entered
>> your full travel details and costs.
> Could you confirm that my form has enough information? I felt the lack
> of feedback on this matter, since there was no required/optional
> f
(...)
Reminder: DebConf7 Registration
---
(...)
If you are applying for travel sponsorship, make sure you have entered
your full travel details and costs.
Hi Moray,
Could you confirm that my form has enough information? I felt the lack
of feedback on this matter, si
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
> If we do go to source-only uploads, could this problem be avoided by
> having arm and other slow arches wait until at least one other arch
> successfully builds the package?
I think that would be a good idea anyway, even if we do not go to
source-
Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Joey Hess
>
> | > (b) source only uploads are in my experience very often badly tested
> | > if they're even tested at all. For a long time after Ubuntu
> | > switched to source only uploads, it was really obvious that a
> | > large number of them hadn't
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 09:42:19PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Joey Hess
>
> | > (b) source only uploads are in my experience very often badly tested
> | > if they're even tested at all. For a long time after Ubuntu
> | > switched to source only uploads, it was really obvious th
Forwarded with agreement by Joerg:
- Forwarded message from Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: (forw) Mails sent to @packages.(qa.)debian.org go to a
blackhole?
Organizat
* Joey Hess
| > (b) source only uploads are in my experience very often badly tested
| > if they're even tested at all. For a long time after Ubuntu
| > switched to source only uploads, it was really obvious that a
| > large number of them hadn't even been test built, never mind
Divulgação de sites via email e listas. Venda de mala direta listas de e-mails,
software mala direta programa para spam, programa para mala direta programa
para
enviar email. Programa de mala direta opt in emails:
Visite agora:
http://www.divulgaemails.com
Mala-direta mala direta via email, ma
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 01:13:00PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 02:13:37PM +, Ross Burton wrote:
> > If you have any particular pet features that have been removed in GNOME
> > and you can make a valid case for their re-inclusion, then file a bug.
>
> I'm afraid the
Hi,
asciidoc is currently in a bad shape and pretty outdated, as I use
asciidoc regulary I'm very interested in having a new and good
maintained asciidoc package. Unfortunatly there are bugs like #376523
which are really annoying and easy to fix. The maintainer also seems to
be very inactive, acc
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> As part of this process, I send initial mails to
> @packages.debian.org and @packages.qa.debian.org to
> warn maintainers about my NMU intent.
[...]
> However, during that last campaign, many maintainers mentioned me that
> they indeed did *not*
Divulgação de sites via email e listas. Venda de mala direta listas de e-mails,
software mala direta programa para spam, programa para mala direta programa
para
enviar email. Programa de mala direta opt in emails:
Visite agora:
http://www.divulgaemails.com
Mala-direta mala direta via email, ma
> > However, during that last campaign, many maintainers mentioned me that
> > they indeed did *not* receive such notices.
>
> For my part, this was long ago and because you didn't Cc:
> @packages.qa.debian.org back then (IIRC).
Yes. During the first campaign (back in October and November), I w
Divulgação de sites via email e listas. Venda de mala direta listas de e-mails,
software mala direta programa para spam, programa para mala direta programa
para
enviar email. Programa de mala direta opt in emails:
Visite agora:
http://www.divulgaemails.com
Mala-direta mala direta via email, ma
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 03:44:39AM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, James Troup wrote:
>
> >Summary
>
> Credit where credit is due. This is exactly the kind of informative
> explanation I have been looking for and I hope we'll see a lot of more of
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007, Christian Perrier wrote:
> However, during that last campaign, many maintainers mentioned me that
> they indeed did *not* receive such notices.
For my part, this was long ago and because you didn't Cc:
@packages.qa.debian.org back then (IIRC).
> For instance, yesterday, a
Hi!
The xmlrpc-c library has not seen an upload since March 2004:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/x/xmlrpc-c.html
There have been, however, several new upstream versions available,
which has already been reported in the BTS since July, 2005:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=317979
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 12:12:16PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 12:00:58PM +0600, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is checklib stopped? Pages say sth like 'Last update: Sun, 08 Oct 2006
> > 17:26:18'.
> >
> > Has checklib been relocated to another place or just aban
Quoting martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> also sprach Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.01.28.1157 +]:
> > However, during that last campaign, many maintainers mentioned me
> > that they indeed did *not* receive such notices.
>
> see #377282
Well, this i snot exactly what I me
also sprach Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.01.28.1157 +]:
> However, during that last campaign, many maintainers mentioned me
> that they indeed did *not* receive such notices.
see #377282
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. kra
Fellow developers,
Some of you probably have seen that I'm currently running a mini
"campaign" to fix longstanding l10n bug reports, mostly for debconf
stuff.
As part of this process, I send initial mails to
@packages.debian.org and @packages.qa.debian.org to
warn maintainers about my NMU intent.
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 12:00:58PM +0600, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is checklib stopped? Pages say sth like 'Last update: Sun, 08 Oct 2006
> 17:26:18'.
>
> Has checklib been relocated to another place or just abandoned?
actually, thanks to Ganneff and Lufthansa machines, we should be ab
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ diff -x *.bzr* -x *pyc -x *~ -x *.o -x *.so -wru
> /org/ftp.debian.org/dak/ debian-archive-kit/ | diffstat
> [...]
> 24 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 362 deletions(-)
Do you have any idea whether there are reason
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 28 Jan 2007, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Is their a developer-accessible mirror (on a non-restricted host) of
>> the archive maintenance which are in production, including (most of)
>> the configuration?
> dak is managed in a bzr repository:
> http
Hi,
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Is their a developer-accessible mirror (on a non-restricted host) of
> the archive maintenance which are in production, including (most of)
> the configuration?
dak is managed in a bzr repository:
http://ftp-master.debian.org/bzr/debian-archive-kit
Is their a developer-accessible mirror (on a non-restricted host) of
the archive maintenance which are in production, including (most of)
the configuration?
There used to be a mirror on merkel.debian.org, but it's no longer
current.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
29 matches
Mail list logo
