=D4=CB=C5?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--DAE9258B67C42C40"
X-Spam: Not detected
DAE9258B67C42C40
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=FA=C4=D2=C1=D7=D3=D4=D7=D5=CA=D4=C5!=ED=D9 =CF=C2=D2=C
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael C. Schultheiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ledger-smb
Version : 1.1.7
Upstream Author : LedgerSMB Core Team
* URL : http://www.ledgersmb.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : A w
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Florent Bayle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: cd5
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Yann Droneaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://projects.meuh.org/cd5/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : Comput
Blogger could not process your message at this time.
Error code: 9.3D734C
Original message:
From: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Date: None
Subject: None
None
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: hannah
Version : 0.2.a
Upstream Author : Stephen Branley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/hannah/
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang: C++
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 10:21:35PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > > > * should packages disable inetd config entries on removal and in
> > > > preparation for upgrade, and then reenable the entries af
also sprach [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.01.14.1242 +0100]:
> http://www.safety4all.de/newsletter-abmelden.htm
Based on judgement, I decided this wasn't spammer harvesting and
have unsubscribed the address.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`.
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 10:21:35PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > * should packages disable inetd config entries on removal and in
> > > preparation for upgrade, and then reenable the entries after upgrade
> > > is complete?
> > No, they shouldn't
===
safety4all.de - Sicherheit für Ihr Zuhause!
===
Herzlich willkommen zum Newsletter von www.safety4all.de.
Ihre Anmeldung wurde registriert, und Sie erhalten zukünftig unseren
kostenlosen Newsletter mit Informati
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi,
Am Sa den 13. Jan 2007 um 1:18 schrieb Roger Leigh:
> > c) update-inetd should default to creating none unless explicitly told
> >to. This has the advantage of staying secure if a dau admin install a
> >package accidentally.
>
> This wou
On Jan 13, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think this has a rather simple solution (for lenny?).
It does not, since there are multiple inet superserver daemons with
incompatible configuration file formats.
Now that I finally have been allowed to split update-inetd from netbase
11 matches
Mail list logo