Hi,
* RalfGesellensetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-03 23:47]:
> Did the domain expire?
>
> demudi.org is full of dead links now.
http://www.agnula.info/ seems to be the new domain.
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de
JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
Forget about tha
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: NIIBE Yutaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: treil
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Daiki Ueno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.unixuser.org/~ueno/software/treil/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Ruby
Descri
On Monday 08 January 2007 20:57, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also sprach Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.01.08.0007 +0100]:
> > Is there any technical reason why busybox could not have such
> > functionality? If not I'll file a bug report (and I'll write the
> > code if I
On Tuesday 09 January 2007 00:36, "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Are there any platforms other than i386, AMD64, and IA64 that support the
> > partition type number?
>
> Not sure. Is there not some magic number associated with different
> partition types? I don't mean like y
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 09:50:31PM -0800, Will Lowe wrote:
> Oh, and ... archive.debian.org doesn't seem to be rsync-enabled. Is
> there anyplace that has woody and *does* support rsync?
ftp.nl.debian.org::debian-archive
(archive.d.o does support rsync, but its host restricted, aiui)
Cheers,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: NIIBE Yutaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: wfo
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Tanaka Akira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.a-k-r.org/wfo/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description : wfo
wfo
Am Montag, den 08.01.2007, 21:50 -0800 schrieb Will Lowe:
> Oh, and ... archive.debian.org doesn't seem to be rsync-enabled. Is
> there anyplace that has woody and *does* support rsync?
http://www.debian.org/distrib/archive.html
mentions several rsync sites.
Regards
Thomas
--
To UN
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: NIIBE Yutaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libescape-ruby
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Tanaka Akira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.a-k-r.org/escape/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description
Package: libperlmenu-perl
Priority: extra
Section: perl
Installed-Size: 220
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Architecture: all
Version: 4.0-4
Replaces: perlmenu
Depends: perl (>= 5.6.0-16), libcurses-perl
Conflicts: perlmenu
Filename: pool/main/libp/libperlmenu-perl/libperlmenu-perl
Oh, and ... archive.debian.org doesn't seem to be rsync-enabled. Is
there anyplace that has woody and *does* support rsync?
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 09:48:13PM -0800, Will Lowe wrote:
> It looks like Woody has moved to the archives:
>
> http://archive.debian.org/dists/woody/
>
> ... I didn't s
It looks like Woody has moved to the archives:
http://archive.debian.org/dists/woody/
... I didn't see an announcment about it to any of the usual lists,
but perhaps I missed it. FYI, there probably still are companies
(like mine :) running large numbers of Woody boxes for legacy
applications wh
Alexey Feldgendler wrote:
>
> cp -avx --preserve=all 1/* 2 # rsync will do as well
Of course, 1/* misses any dot-files in 1.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As a lot of gnome 2.16 currently in experimental has been uploaded for
> amd64, there's a lot of it not built for x86 yet.
>
> I heard several times people claim experimental was autobuilt, but are
> there any x86 autobuilder set up for experimental ?
Ther
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
* Package name: pdk
Version : 0.9.3
Upstream Author : Darrin Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://componentizedlinux.org/
* License : GPL
Description : Componentized Linux Platform Development Kit (PDK)
Gre
Russel Coker spoke:
: >The rescue mode of the installer needs a step
: >to activate MD devices. Currently, only the plain
: >disk partitions are visible; that's no help.
:
: Sounds like a reasonable request. Filed a bug report?
:
: Note that it has to be an optional measure.
I wil
> in the KDE Team we use: Maintainer , Uploaders responsible for the packages>. The list beeing [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ditto for D-I packages...
That policy could also progressively be adopted by the fonts packaging
team but I don't consider that team solid enough to really
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 03:26:21AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
:
: [Claus Fischer]
: > 9. cdrecord's miserable state is well known
: >
: >Like the majority of other Linux users, I wonder when
: > $ burn_my_iso_to_cd /dev/cdrom
: >will work as expected.
:
: Hmmm.
:
: $ wodim fi
#include
* Marco d'Itri [Mon, Jan 08 2007, 05:34:47PM]:
> On Jan 08, Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > My impression is that it always takes the X string part from cdromX and
> > appends it to cdrw, resulting in no "cdrw" symlink if "cdrom" has no
> > writting capabilities. If I am ri
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: pdk
Version : 0.9.3
Upstream Author : Darrin Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://componentizedlinux.org/
* License : GPL
Description : Componentized Linux P
On Jan 08, Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My impression is that it always takes the X string part from cdromX and
> appends it to cdrw, resulting in no "cdrw" symlink if "cdrom" has no
> writting capabilities. If I am right then... uhm, it sucks and should be
> changed ASAP. A setup lik
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 09:42:11AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Pierre Habouzit dijo [Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 11:58:49AM +0100]:
> > > Uh? Why? Your maintainer field seems to address this issue. In our
> > > scheme that's would be more a problem, but if the mailing list is
> > > responsive it's enough.
On Mon, 08 Jan 2007, Marcus Better wrote:
> Christoph Berg wrote:
> > Note that you can subscribe additional packages to any maintainer
> > view. The GIS team does that:
>
> Is there a way to subscribe a mailing list to receive bug reports also,
> without having the mailing list in the Maintainer
> Christoph Berg wrote:
>> Note that you can subscribe additional packages to any maintainer
>> view. The GIS team does that:
>
> Is there a way to subscribe a mailing list to receive bug reports also,
> without having the mailing list in the Maintainer field?
>
> Marcus
On the PTS you can subscri
Hello,
On Mon, 08 Jan 2007, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am Mo den 8. Jan 2007 um 5:15 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> [flame]
>
> is it really necessary to start flames in this list? Kevin Mark did
> answer completely objective. To bring him down with this kind of answer
> is absolute below the
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: deepak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: O: libperlmenu-perl -- short description This package is now orphaned
by
Deepak Tripathi
Message-ID: <[EMAIL
Pierre Habouzit dijo [Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 11:58:49AM +0100]:
> > Uh? Why? Your maintainer field seems to address this issue. In our
> > scheme that's would be more a problem, but if the mailing list is
> > responsive it's enough. Think for example at the debian-release mailing
> > list: it's a lis
Russell Coker dijo [Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 10:07:12AM +1100]:
> > Other than the partition type, there's no way to do this, and
> > setting the partition type is not always desirable.
>
> It's not always possible on other architectures. What do you do on a
> platform
> that supports the BSD disk
Christoph Berg wrote:
> Note that you can subscribe additional packages to any maintainer
> view. The GIS team does that:
Is there a way to subscribe a mailing list to receive bug reports also,
without having the mailing list in the Maintainer field?
Marcus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
#include
* Marco d'Itri [Mon, Jan 08 2007, 02:21:12PM]:
> On Jan 08, Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Also note that it seems like there is currently nothing to create that
> > symlink. It seems like kernel passes only names like /dev/cdrwX where X
> > is steadily increasing. Only /d
Re: Pierre Habouzit 2007-01-08 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > The perl team, on the other hand, uses the different scheme:
> > Maintainer: "main responsible person for the package"
> > Uploaders: the team mailing list, + members who actually care for the
> > package (who have touched it in the past,
Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 7 Jan 2007 08:40:17 -0700, "Wesley J. Landaker"
>>
>>Months; I've had to switch 10's of clients to use ftp.debian.org instead
>>since I've been getting intermittant problems like this with
>>ftp.us.debian.org since ~ October last year.
>
> That's
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 10:07:12AM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
>
> It's not always possible on other architectures. What do you do on a
> platform
> that supports the BSD disk label and has no type number?
>
> Are there any platforms other than i386, AMD64, and IA64 that support the
> partiti
On Jan 08, Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also note that it seems like there is currently nothing to create that
> symlink. It seems like kernel passes only names like /dev/cdrwX where X
> is steadily increasing. Only /dev/cdrom seems to be useable as a
> constant filename but for many
#include
* Peter Samuelson [Mon, Jan 08 2007, 03:26:21AM]:
>
> [Claus Fischer]
> > 9. cdrecord's miserable state is well known
> >
> >Like the majority of other Linux users, I wonder when
> > $ burn_my_iso_to_cd /dev/cdrom
> >will work as expected.
>
> Hmmm.
>
> $ wodim filenam
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 11:24:50AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 09:03:03AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > - it's difficult to keep track of who is caring for that package (hint:
> > QA, MIA, ...)
>
> Uh? Why? Your maintainer field seems to address this issue. In
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 09:03:03AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I'm a member of the pkg-ruby-extras team. In this team, we use the
> following scheme for the Maintainer and Uploaders fields:
> Maintainer: "main responsible person for the package" (ie best contact
> point)
> Uploaders: the t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 10:15:13AM +0100, Martin Wuertele wrote:
> * Klaus Ethgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-08 10:09]:
>
> > is it really necessary to start flames in this list? Kevin Mark did
> > answer completely objective.
>
> He didn't answer
also sprach Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.01.08.0007 +0100]:
> Is there any technical reason why busybox could not have such
> functionality? If not I'll file a bug report (and I'll write the
> code if I ever have spare time).
Why busybox and not just mdassemble, which is a stripped ver
Le lundi 08 janvier 2007 à 06:47 +, Debian Installer a écrit :
> Rejected: gtk+2.0_2.10.6-5_arm.changes: not signed by authorised uploader
Do I understand that the Great and Almighty Arm Buildd Maintainer that
no one shall override with "rogue" autobuilders is also willing to take
care of expe
* Klaus Ethgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-08 10:09]:
> is it really necessary to start flames in this list? Kevin Mark did
> answer completely objective.
He didn't answer the question in case you haven't noted.
yours Martin
--
http://martin.wuertele.net/ -- Debian -- OFTC -- SPI -- [EMAIL PRO
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 09:41:59AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Your mail to 'Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers' with the subject
>
> Re: Best scheme for teams and Maintainer/Uploaders fields ?
>
> Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
>
> The reason it is being h
[Claus Fischer]
> 9. cdrecord's miserable state is well known
>
>Like the majority of other Linux users, I wonder when
> $ burn_my_iso_to_cd /dev/cdrom
>will work as expected.
Hmmm.
$ wodim filename.iso
works for most situations. But:
1) You must be root, or a member of the '
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Am Mo den 8. Jan 2007 um 5:15 schrieb Steve Langasek:
[flame]
is it really necessary to start flames in this list? Kevin Mark did
answer completely objective. To bring him down with this kind of answer
is absolute below the level cultivated
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> in the KDE Team we use: Maintainer , Uploaders responsible for the packages>. The list beeing [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Java team uses the same method, but it has IMHO the huge drawback
that "uploaders" sometimes stop paying attention to a package wit
On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 09:03:03 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
[pkg-ruby]
> Maintainer: "main responsible person for the package" (ie best contact
> point)
> Uploaders: the team mailing list, + all the members of the team
> (auto-generated using a cdbs rule)
It's interesting that you bring thi
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 09:03:03AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm a member of the pkg-ruby-extras team. In this team, we use the
> following scheme for the Maintainer and Uploaders fields:
> Maintainer: "main responsible person for the package" (ie best contact
> point)
> Uploade
Hi,
I'm a member of the pkg-ruby-extras team. In this team, we use the
following scheme for the Maintainer and Uploaders fields:
Maintainer: "main responsible person for the package" (ie best contact
point)
Uploaders: the team mailing list, + all the members of the team
(auto-generated usi
47 matches
Mail list logo
