On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 07:22:50 +0100 (CET)
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Neil Williams wrote:
>
> > Description : GPE image gallery and viewer, with slideshow support
> > A small application for viewing images in GPE. Intended to show
> > small and medium sized
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 17:29, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Roll a custom kernel that either statically links the modules, or
> loads them in your preferred order?
I don't see how this helps me bring up the network at the right time. I guess
you are suggesting this in addition to shuffling around i
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Neil Williams wrote:
Description : GPE image gallery and viewer, with slideshow support
A small application for viewing images in GPE. Intended to show
small and medium sized images and is able to display a slide
show and to perform several simple operations with the im
Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Also those package (and they are plenty others), could be tagged
> not-for-us. This would spare some build daemon time, and would ease to
> see which packages have really failed to build or not.
[...]
>openafs_1.4.2-4
As the OpenAFS co-mainta
Hi,
I just prepared a NMU for toolbar-fancy [1], a package maintained by
Ryuichi Arafune. Now, I usually check the QA page for maintainers for
which I do NMUs. Now, Ryuichi's QA page [2] shows he has been quite
inactive in the project - His latest upload AFAICT was in 2006-03-30
for imagemagick [3
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gpe-gallery
Version : 0.97
Upstream Author : Damien Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://gpe.linuxtogo.org/projects/gpe-gallery.shtml
* License : GPL
Programming Lan
Joey Hess wrote:
> I checked the log, the current muti dvd doesn't seem to have any desktop
> packages on it, not even gnome-desktop-environment.
Wrong log as it turns out. The gnome task is there, in full, as are
almost all other tasks, except for a few of the last language tasks. The
kde task di
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 03:43:55PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > I'm sure they're, so can't we go for a new multiarch containing hppa
> > and ia64 only or even i386, hppa and ia64 ?
> Hmm, keeping i386 on it is an interesting idea. Or it could have alpha,
> hppa, and ia64, for the big/old/weird/64 b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/20/06 18:16, Warren Turkal wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 December 2006 02:59, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> Just rearrange the initscripts so that mdadm is ran _after_ aoetools.
>
> If it were only that easy, I would do that. However, there is much more
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 02:59, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Just rearrange the initscripts so that mdadm is ran _after_ aoetools.
If it were only that easy, I would do that. However, there is much more to it.
For instance, the mdadm and lvm and evms run in the initramfs. Also the
ethernet card
Le mercredi 20 décembre 2006 à 16:27 -0500, Joey Hess a écrit :
> Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > It's somewhat a shame not to have gnome-office, or at least gimp,
> > inkscape and gnumeric, which are by many points superior to other
> > alternatives.
>
> We do have gimp in the desktop task. I'm willi
Torsten Werner a écrit :
> HI Aurelien,
>
> On 12/20/06, Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Rejected: cpufire-applet_1.2-2_arm.changes: not signed by authorised uploader
>
> did you manage to build cpufire-applet on arm? Can I help with
> uploading the package?
Yes, this package buil
Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
> [...]
>>> - I've requested rescheduling the package on ARM as it should now build
>>> successfully, but I haven't seen any reply on this one.
>>>
>> If you have written to [EMAIL PROTECTED], this is the right place. I
>> wish you good luck, as it is roughly an alias
[...]
>
> > - I've requested rescheduling the package on ARM as it should now build
> > successfully, but I haven't seen any reply on this one.
> >
>
> If you have written to [EMAIL PROTECTED], this is the right place. I
> wish you good luck, as it is roughly an alias to /dev/null.
>
[...]
Hm
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> It's somewhat a shame not to have gnome-office, or at least gimp,
> inkscape and gnumeric, which are by many points superior to other
> alternatives.
We do have gimp in the desktop task. I'm willing to consider gnumeric
and inkscape. Actually I wouldn't really mind revisi
Le mercredi 20 décembre 2006 à 16:03 -0500, Joey Hess a écrit :
> > Not having "gnome" on a single CD is understandable given how much we've
> > bloated this metapackage.
>
> Actually, we don't even include the gnome metapackage in the full
> gnome-desktop task. gnome-office, gdm-themes and gnome-
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Are you talking of gnome-core or gnome-desktop-environment? gnome-core
> is indeed really basic, but g-d-e already includes a complete desktop.
gnome-desktop-environment is the sole key package in the gnome-desktop
task, and nearly the only one from that task that current
Le mercredi 20 décembre 2006 à 14:21 -0500, Joey Hess a écrit :
> Gustavo Franco wrote:
> > Unfortunately, even the GNOME desktop environment doesn't fit on the
> > CD#1.
>
> True, but enough does fit to have a basically useable gnome desktop.
Are you talking of gnome-core or gnome-desktop-enviro
Gustavo Franco wrote:
> Do you know what's broken in Xfce cd? Is it tasksel related? I hope not.
Missing task file, it should be fixed in the next build.
> Sounds great, could you give me a link with the log or check it in the
> next build please?
I checked the log, the current muti dvd doesn't
Mirco Bauer a écrit :
> Hi Aurelien,
>
> I can give some details about the Mono related packages that failed to
> build before but worked for you. I reply inline.
>
> On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 17:39 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> * Packages that now build fine:
>>blam_1.8.3-2 (for 40 days)
Oops
Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
> --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>> =20
>> Rejected: gcc-h8300-hms_4.1.1-3_arm.changes: not signed by authorised upl=
> oader
>> =20
>> =20
>> =3D=3D=3D
>> =2
On 12/20/06, Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 05:04:28PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
(...)
>>In case it's not obvious, the 3 arches picked for these discs are
>>simply the most common end-user systems out there. There is scope for
>>producing more multi-arch disc
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 05:04:28PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
>
>Let me thanks the debian-desktop, debian-installer and tasksel team
>too. Without them, that stuff would be useless.
Yup, of course. :-)
>I would like to clarify that debian-desktop (alioth, svn, mailing
>list) is now a unit compo
Hi Aurelien,
I can give some details about the Mono related packages that failed to
build before but worked for you. I reply inline.
On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 17:39 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> * Packages that now build fine:
>blam_1.8.3-2 (for 40 days)
blam failed because of a runtime bug (whi
On 12/20/06, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gustavo Franco wrote:
> Unfortunately, even the GNOME desktop environment doesn't fit on the
> CD#1.
True, but enough does fit to have a basically useable gnome desktop.
Right, but we need to make it clear for the users and the first line
of th
Gustavo Franco wrote:
> Unfortunately, even the GNOME desktop environment doesn't fit on the
> CD#1.
True, but enough does fit to have a basically useable gnome desktop.
> You will need broadband connection to fetch some more packages
> or use the full DVD#1 for your architecture. The bonus is th
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 12:32:25PM -0600, Bill Gatliff wrote:
>
> Could you try those packages on hedges? (You can get developer access
> from Wookey if you need it). Hedges has 512MB real and 1.5GB swap. And
> unlike leisner, the netwinders, or nslu2s, it's expandable if needed.
No use, thi
I hope its not too inappropriate to post this message on this group, I
am not a developer but I subscribed to this group a long time ago just
to keep in touch with what was happening with Debian
I just want to say thank you so much for this fantastic system :
Etch/Testing It works so fine on my
On 12/20/06, Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(...)
Gnome vs. KDE vs. XFCE
==
The KDE and XFCE variants of CD#1 are now being produced to give more
choice to people for initial installation. By default, CD#1 has always
meant to be enough to install a fully-functioni
Bill:
A very basic reason is that some packages require 1GB of RAM to build
in finite time and there are no arm and m68k buildd with that amount of
RAM.
Could you try those packages on hedges? (You can get developer access
from Wookey if you need it). Hedges has 512MB real and 1.5GB swa
Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
> * Packages that failed to build because the build daemon netwinder is
> fucked for weeks wrt to /usr/lib/libtasn1.so.3.0.6
>cpufire-applet_1.2-2
>gnome-session_2.14.3-4
The situation is actually worse than what I expected. This build daemon
seems to loose fil
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006, Bill Gatliff wrote:
> For the faster arches, i.e. the ARM9 machines and above, I'm thinking
> that we should stick with real hardware so there's no question that the
> binaries will run properly.
Pardon me sir, but can that claim that binaries built on so-called
"real h
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 05:05:21PM +, Wookey wrote:
> On 2006-12-20 17:39 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > For those who don't know, I have setup 8 emulated ARM build daemons and
> > started to upload packages. To know why and for more information, see
> > [1].
>
> Very impressive
Wookey a écrit :
> On 2006-12-20 17:39 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> For those who don't know, I have setup 8 emulated ARM build daemons and
>> started to upload packages. To know why and for more information, see
>> [1].
>
> Very impressive piece of work aurelien! We ought to discuss
Wookey wrote:
On 2006-12-20 17:39 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Hi,
For those who don't know, I have setup 8 emulated ARM build daemons and
started to upload packages. To know why and for more information, see
[1].
Very impressive piece of work aurelien! We ought to discuss if there
i
Wookey a écrit :
> On 2006-12-20 17:39 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> For those who don't know, I have setup 8 emulated ARM build daemons and
>> started to upload packages. To know why and for more information, see
>> [1].
>
> Very impressive piece of work aurelien! We ought to discuss
Luk Claes a écrit :
> How did Aurelien get wanna-build access for his buildd without
> explaining to the respective team how the buildd was maintained in the
> first place or did he not ask for it...
>
I have setup a wanna-build database (I am the one running the
wanna-build database for hurd-i
On 2006-12-20 17:39 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For those who don't know, I have setup 8 emulated ARM build daemons and
> started to upload packages. To know why and for more information, see
> [1].
Very impressive piece of work aurelien! We ought to discuss if there
is any significant
[this discussion is off-topic on -devel, please follow-up on -project]
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 05:51:55PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> How did Aurelien get wanna-build access for his buildd
He didn't, it's a rogue autobuilder. Which is the reason it got
blacklisted.
> or did he not ask for it...
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
I happened to have had access to the internet during my vacation, and
I happened to read a backlog on #debian-release that frightens me:
15:52 aj | "# unilateral action to run an emulated buildd -- all arm changes
sidelined until fixed."
15:52aba | oh, where?
15
Hi,
For those who don't know, I have setup 8 emulated ARM build daemons and
started to upload packages. To know why and for more information, see
[1].
These afternoon I saw on #debian-release:
15:52:11 aj | "# unilateral action to run an emulated buildd -- all arm
changes sidelined until fixe
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 05:03:35PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Aurelien mailed debian-arm, went to #debian-arm, had no response. He
> then warn about his intention [1] to run qemu-based autobuilders to fill
> the gap due to broken arm buildds. He did that on the open, and got ...
> zero answe
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 05:03:35PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> I happened to have had access to the internet during my vacation, and
> I happened to read a backlog on #debian-release that frightens me:
>
> [...]
>
> So, why :
> * does aurelien initiative causes troubles ?
especial
I happened to have had access to the internet during my vacation, and
I happened to read a backlog on #debian-release that frightens me:
15:52 aj | "# unilateral action to run an emulated buildd -- all arm
changes sidelined until fixed."
15:52aba | oh, where?
15:52 aj | cron.uncheck
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libwps
Version : no release yet
Upstream Author : Andrew Ziem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://libwps.sf.net
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description :
Le mercredi 20 décembre 2006 à 13:29 +, Sam Morris a écrit :
> > In all cases, as esound is buggy and unmaintained in Debian, it is
> > deactivated by default at least in all GNOME software. The default for
> > gstreamer, vlc, xine and others is to use direct ALSA output, which, as
> > you expl
Joachim Breitner schrieb am Mittwoch, den 20. Dezember 2006:
*snip*
> Interesting. It seems to be similar to keyjnote. Does it support
> clicking on internal links of the pdf document, or is it just rendering
> the pdf as ???dumb images??? on the screen?
It looks like that they are just rendered
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 13:55:03 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 20 décembre 2006 à 11:33 +, Sam Morris a écrit :
>> On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:15:47 +0300, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>> > Somehow I had libesd0 installed while I have alsa as well, and this
>> > prevents alsa from working prop
Le mercredi 20 décembre 2006 à 11:33 +, Sam Morris a écrit :
> On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:15:47 +0300, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> > Somehow I had libesd0 installed while I have alsa as well, and this
> > prevents alsa from working properly - I had to do alsaconf after each
> > reboot.
> > Shouldn't t
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:15:47 +0300, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> Somehow I had libesd0 installed while I have alsa as well, and this
> prevents alsa from working properly - I had to do alsaconf after each
> reboot.
> Shouldn't the libesd-alsa0 be automatically installed with alsa instead
> the libesd0?
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 02:26:14AM -0700, Warren Turkal wrote:
> DDs,
>
> I am looking for some info on this subject. I have looked at both the
> aoetools
> and open-iscsi for a solution to the following problem.
>
> I have a block device that is served over aoe. Basically, I would like to
> t
51 matches
Mail list logo
