The message was not delivered due to the following reason:
Your message was not delivered because the destination computer was
unreachable within the allowed queue period. The amount of time
a message is queued before it is returned depends on local configura-
tion parameters.
Most likely there i
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 09:58:48PM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> I issued:
> # ifup eth0
> manually on both boxes but nothing happened.
This probably means that ifup thought the interface was already up --
ie there was an "eth0" entry in /etc/network/ifstate. This is supposed to
be cleare
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mario Iseli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ccollect
Version : 0.5.1
Upstream Author : Nico Schottelius
* URL : http://linux.schottelius.org/ccollect/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: shell
Description : Tiny
On Sunday 17 December 2006 13:58, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Two or three weeks ago I installed the current latest Debian/Testing on
> two different servers. Last week I had to reboot both and noticed that
> none of them appeared back in the network again. I checked them locally
> and noticed that on
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 06:07:18PM -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
> The version I'm building is libtorrent-0.11.0 so I don't think I should
> call the binary libtorrent10.
Why not? The version of a library and its soname have seldomly
anything to do with each other (and if so, it may be a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: lastfmproxy
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Vidar Madsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://vidar.gimp.org/lastfmproxy/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Descri
Jose Luis Rivas Contreras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >Package: rtorrent
> >Version: 0.4.1-1a0.mrvn.1
> >Severity: wishlist
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >I would like to see some features like DHT in rtorrent to make it
> >more competitive with other clients. For an overview see
> >[...]
>
> This bug probab
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 05:32:36PM -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
> Should be named something like `fdisk-gnu` or `fdiskgnu`, the binary too
> for avoid problems with the `fdisk` binary that already exists.
Well, binaries shipped in the packages are already renamed to avoid
conflicts ag
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm maintaining libtorrent package, this source builds 2 binaries,
libtorrent-rakshasa (is libtorrent9 last version in debian archive) and
libtorrent-rakshasa-dev (is libtorrent9 last version in debian archive),
I get this warning from lintian when I b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ron Johnson escribió:
> On 12/17/06 09:43, Julien Louis wrote:
>> Package: wnpp
>> Severity: wishlist
>> Owner: Julien Louis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> * Package name: fdisk
>> Version : 0.9.1
>> Upstream Author : Leslie P. Polzer <[EMAI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/17/06 09:43, Julien Louis wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Julien Louis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: fdisk
> Version : 0.9.1
> Upstream Author : Leslie P. Polzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL
Hello,
I have just created a tracker on wotomae in order to show the progress
of this task:
http://wotomae.debian.net/tracker/emacsen
Regards,
Arnaud Fontaine
pgpse02fcAS8R.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
Two or three weeks ago I installed the current latest Debian/Testing on
two different servers. Last week I had to reboot both and noticed that
none of them appeared back in the network again. I checked them locally
and noticed that on both boxes the network interface was not brought up.
I issu
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006, David Weinehall wrote:
> Some entries seem to list newer Debian-versions than upstream
> versions... Some watch-files out of sync?
The list of GNOME versions is built from the 2.16 tarball repository,
but Debian might have cherry-picked some newer upstream releases, such
Nikita V Youshchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1. Upstream does not provide a manual page for the binary. Packager
> decided to add binary-without-manpage to lintian override file, and Tag:
> no-manual-for-binary to linda override file.
Please don't do this. The lintian tag can be used by ot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>Package: rtorrent
>Version: 0.4.1-1a0.mrvn.1
>Severity: wishlist
>
>Hi,
>
>I would like to see some features like DHT in rtorrent to make it more
>competitive with other clients. For an overview see
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_BitTor
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Louis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: fdisk
Version : 0.9.1
Upstream Author : Leslie P. Polzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.gnu.org/software/fdisk/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 04:52:04PM +0100, Frederic Peters wrote:
> Luk Claes wrote:
>
> > Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > I've noticed (and I'm not the only one) that the package database as
> > > access by madison on merkel is no longer up-to-date. Does anyone know
> > > why? Could someone rectify t
Luk Claes wrote:
> Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > I've noticed (and I'm not the only one) that the package database as
> > access by madison on merkel is no longer up-to-date. Does anyone know
> > why? Could someone rectify this situation, please?
>
> The updates have not been reactivated since the m
On Sunday 17 December 2006 10:29, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
> You ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >> Probably we should accurately specify suffixes of packages,
> >> e.g. make them libssh-0 and libssh2-0 to avoid libssh2 package
> >> which is actually libssh with soname bumped to 2. Source packages
>
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 11:44:27AM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> Make sure you compile it with --with-libgcrypt, so that it really is
> LGPL. If it's linked to OpenSSL, then a GPLed application using this
> library probably needs to add a license exception before we can
> distribute it.
Ehm, never
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 11:03:51PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Garcia Ballester wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> I'm looking for a sponsor for the libssh package :
>
> * Package name: libssh
> Version : 0.2rc
> Upstream Author : "Aris Adamantiadis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : h
You ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> Probably we should accurately specify suffixes of packages,
>> e.g. make them libssh-0 and libssh2-0 to avoid libssh2 package
>> which is actually libssh with soname bumped to 2. Source packages
>> libssh and libssh2 are ok.
JGB> Do you mean libssh-SONAME a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mikhail Gusarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libssh2
Version : 0.14
Upstream Author : Sara Golemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://libssh2.org/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : SSH2 clien
Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> (2) binary-without-manpage/no-manual-for-binary should not be added, so
> linda/lintian complains remind that manual page should be written one day,
Lintian overrides are intended for false positives. Unsing them to
suppress reports of valid packaging problems is c
You ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> I have to raise the problem that two projects 'libssh' and 'libssh2'
>> (http://libssh2.org/) are existing (and I will ITP libssh2 soon).
>>
>> This may easily lead to the clash of names.
JGB> I'm aware of this problem, but is there any solution other than
On Sunday 17 December 2006 05:54, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
> You ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> JGB> Hi everybody, I'm looking for a sponsor for the libssh package :
> JGB> * Package name: libssh
>
> I have to raise the problem that two projects 'libssh' and 'libssh2'
> (http://libssh2.org/) ar
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 09:50:18PM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 10:54:20PM +, Paul Cager wrote:
> > I'm packaging AFNIX which provides four or five executables and a bunch
> > of shared objects that the executables use. Since the SOs are not likely
28 matches
Mail list logo
