Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > IMPROVE QA - THE LINTIAN PROGRAM
>
> > know how to comply with standard sh scripts, this is great oppurtunity
> > to make lintian to warn them. Simple typical constructs would not be
> > hard to add - substle
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: teamspeak-server
Version : 2.0.20.1
Upstream Author : TeamSpeak Systems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.goteamspeak.com/
* License : non-free, with Debian
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Xfce Maintainers
* Package name: xfce4-cpu-freq-plugin
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : Thomas Schreck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/panel-plugins/xfce4-cpufreq-plugin
* License :
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 05:59:46PM +, Darren Salt wrote:
> I demand that Gabor Gombas may or may not have written...
>
> [snip]
> > So again I propose that instead of listing features, policy should just
> > say "maintainer scripts must work with bash, dash [and probably a 3rd
> > alternative]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: kvm
Version : 0.0.2
Upstream Author : Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://kvm.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Program
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Patrick Donker]
Is this a bug or is there a Grand Plan^© behind the way Deb did it?
Will it ever work?
It is ment to be fixed in initscripts version 2.86.ds1-16. Is it not
working for you, or are you using an older version?
I'm using 2.86.ds1-2
--
T
[Patrick Donker]
> Is this a bug or is there a Grand Plan^© behind the way Deb did it?
> Will it ever work?
It is ment to be fixed in initscripts version 2.86.ds1-16. Is it not
working for you, or are you using an older version?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I go to:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=maint&data=bam%40debian.org&archive=no&version=&dist=unstable
> The first bug listed in the "Outstanding section" is bug
> #347813. However, this bug has been closed.
> I suspect that this is
I demand that Gabor Gombas may or may not have written...
[snip]
> So again I propose that instead of listing features, policy should just
> say "maintainer scripts must work with bash, dash [and probably a 3rd
> alternative]".
busybox?
--
| Darren Salt| linux or ds at | nr. As
On dom, 2006-11-12 at 14:02 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> tla is wrong. The name of the protocol is arch; and tla and
> baz are competing implementations of the standard.
Agreed, will fix this.
> I suggest that we specify tow headers: and SCM specific
> header, XS-Vcs- wher
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 03:50:46AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > On Sun, 12 Nov 2006, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > When using "bts show package" or going to
> > > "http://bugs.debian.org/package"; we get that behaviour, and I find
> > > both of them annoying.
Hello all,
First of all, sorry for the x-post, I have no idea which list is the
right one for this question.
After not getting to work mounting a net device during bootup using the
_netdev option I did some Googling on the subject. Result was that
Debian apparently doesnt support the _netdev o
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 03:50:46AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Nov 2006, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > When using "bts show package" or going to
> > "http://bugs.debian.org/package"; we get that behaviour, and I find
> > both of them annoying.
>
> I switched the default to appending dist=unt
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 09:06:05AM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 07:11:43AM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
> > Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > IMPROVE QA
>
> > All discussion about "policy has problems" is really due to lack of
> > quality assurance work
Hi, Emmanuel
dudki sounds interesting!
Emmanuel Bouthenot wrote:
> Dudki! is a process maintenance daemon that checks whether
> certain processes are running (based on pidfiles) and, if
> needed, tries to restart them. It supports a self-test
> commandline invocation which can be used in a cr
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Philippe Cloutier wrote:
> > See #363967. I heard some doubts about panthera's ability to handle
> > more stuff, so maybe you can offer help.
>
> thanks you for your trust in me, this makes me very happy.
Daniel, don't take this personally, don't be unhappy. I know your TO
On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 14:02 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I suggest that we specify tow headers: and SCM specific
> header, XS-Vcs- where name is one keyword from a specified list
> (bzr, cvs, svn, darcs, git, hf, or arch), and XS-VCS-Browse, which is
> a plain old HTTP URL.
Yes, thi
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 07:11:43AM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> IMPROVE QA
> All discussion about "policy has problems" is really due to lack of
> quality assurance work that prevents non-sh-compliant scripts to
> enter into the packaging in the first
18 matches
Mail list logo
