On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 02:11:24PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > > Option 4)
> > > * Set "Architecture: any"
> > > * Have fancy script to fail in s390.
> > > * Ask ftp-master for removal of package for s390
> > > * Make entry in quinn-diff not to build on s390
> > This is an acceptable solution
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 05:59:07PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
...
> > Option 3)
> > * Set "Architecture: alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel
> > powerpc sparc"
> > * Ask ftp-master for removal of package for s390
> > * Make entry in quinn-diff not to build on s390
>
> This
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 06:32:09PM -0300, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> If you need help, I can test and/or help fixing bugs. I have the
> hardware and I'm eager to stop using ubunu's packages for this.
I have just updated http://www.wooyd.org/debian/ipw3945-daemon/
with the new version of the package,
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 10:20:47AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > > Anyone have suggestion?
> > One possibility is to list the package as Architecture: any, but construct
> > your debian/rules file such that the package fails to build if the
> > architecture is s390.
> That may be a good solution i
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 03:04:54PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 11:17:57PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 02:00:32PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > Package: gsynaptics
> > > Version: 0.9.7-1
> > > Severity: serious
>
> > > gsynaptics lists s3
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Arjan Oosting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: haskell-filepath
Version : 0.10
Upstream Author : Neil Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
http://www-users.cs.york.ac.uk/~ndm/proj
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 06:53:20PM -0500, Paul Ford, O'Neil wrote:
> Hello Debian OS,
Hi Paul,
Debian is the uviveral os and a Free software Community. Welcome!
>
> I live in Everett, 25 miles North of Seattle and am looking for a
> Debian Gnome to provide me with a hard copy of Debian to operate
Hello Debian OS,
I live in Everett, 25 miles North of Seattle and am looking for a Debian Gnome
to provide me with a hard copy of Debian to operate on two boxes:
1.) Dell Inspiron [2001]
1.0 Ghrz Processor
256 Meg RAM
4 Gig Hardrive
2.) PC
700 Mghrz Processor
256 Meg RAM
10 Gig Hardrive
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 7, 2006 12:31 pm, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>
>> So? It's up to the adminstrator to configure the packages after
>> installation.
>>
>> The default of 0.0.0.0:80 may work as expected in some cases, but the
>> p
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 11:17:57PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 02:00:32PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Package: gsynaptics
> > Version: 0.9.7-1
> > Severity: serious
> > gsynaptics lists s390 as supported (Architecture: any) but
> > xserver-xorg-input-synaptics is not ava
Le mercredi 08 novembre 2006 à 12:35 +1100, Brian May a écrit :
> Back on topic, is Samba included in the default installation?
A graphical SMB client is included as part of the desktop task.
--
Josselin Mouette/\./\
"Do you have any more insane proposals for me?"
signature.as
Le jeudi 09 novembre 2006 à 01:58 +0100, Magnus Holmgren a écrit :
> 1. Prayer is geared towards large-scale, perhaps even *very* large-scale
> installations. It offers speed and low resource usage at the expense of
> flexibility. Most admins probably will want to use an Apache-based package,
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Jaldhar H. Vyas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: karchiver
Version : 3.4.2
Upstream Author : Eric Coquelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://perso.orange.fr/coquelle/karchiver/
* License : GPL
Description : wor
Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [Goswin von Brederlow]
>> Do they fail when you use sudo instead of fakeroot or when you run the
>> complete build process as root?
>
> The usual reason a package fails with sudo is that it assumes the
> $(PWD) macro will be available, pointing to the
On Fri November 10 2006 02:36, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 12:01:10AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Firstly, should we be pointing to the SuS instead of POSIX
> > (there is work going on a new version of the SUS), since it is
> > open, and readily avail
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 11:17:57PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 02:00:32PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Package: gsynaptics
> > Version: 0.9.7-1
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > gsynaptics lists s390 as supported (Architecture: any) but
> > xserver-xorg-input-synaptics is not
Hi,
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 09:33:13 -0800, Zack Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I'd like to see this say something about what may be assumed of the
> standard shell utilities, as well as the shell itself, and in
> particular I'd like to see coreutils bug #339085 addressed [please
> see the bug l
Your message dated Fri, 10 Nov 2006 16:47:27 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line not in Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re
Hi!
Now the poor guy ain't.
I didn't turn the TV off.
I feel so very guilty.
There won't be school no more.
a million, more or less.
and there won't be no more tests.
Like history and math.
I'm sure my heart will break.
There won't be school no more.
but the joke was lost on me.
My friends all s
Le Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 09:47:56AM -0600, Carlo Segre a écrit :
>
> Hi Charles:
>
> The program is itself called sixpack. There was an ITP some time ago
> (2002-2003) for another program called sixpack but the wnpp bug was RFP
> and it was closed due to 2 years of inactivity. What would you p
Hi Charles:
The program is itself called sixpack. There was an ITP some time ago
(2002-2003) for another program called sixpack but the wnpp bug was RFP
and it was closed due to 2 years of inactivity. What would you propose
for your sixpack binary?
Cheers,
Carlo
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Ch
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 02:00:32PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Package: gsynaptics
> Version: 0.9.7-1
> Severity: serious
>
> gsynaptics lists s390 as supported (Architecture: any) but
> xserver-xorg-input-synaptics is not available. This leads to
> uninstallable binary packages.
I see. But xs
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006, Holger Levsen wrote:
> I filled this as #397716 and have received no reply yet
(One reason is that the pkg-gnome-maintainers list wasn't subscribed to
the PTS.)
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
Is anyone interested in apt-file? I have a proposed NMU that fixes
severity important bug #397381 and I am looking for a sponsor.
There is also a more detailed patch that closes another four bugs and
(I think) makes apt-file pattern matching much less broken. See the
patch attached to bug #3823
Sex, 2006-11-10 às 13:52 +0100, Josselin Mouette escreveu:
> Le vendredi 10 novembre 2006 à 12:16 +0100, Holger Levsen a écrit :
> > last weekend I did a etch default debian install, in which gnome is the
> > default desktop environment. update-manager is installed as a part of it,
> > and
> > a
severity 397716 serious
thanks
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: #397716 - please provide a debian-icon on the default desktop
install, not an ubuntu one
Date: Friday 10 November 2006 13:52
From: Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Le vendredi 10 novembre 2006 à 12:16 +0100, Holger Levsen a écrit :
> last weekend I did a etch default debian install, in which gnome is the
> default desktop environment. update-manager is installed as a part of it, and
> accessable over the Desktop/Administration/update-manager menu. The icon
sa-exim was [1]orphaned on February 12. Four days later, Anand Kumria
announced his ITA, but he never completed the adoption and hasn't responded
to several mails about the issue. He doesn't seem to be MIA though; he has
uploaded at least one [2]package pretty recently. That was before I mailed
[Goswin von Brederlow]
> Do they fail when you use sudo instead of fakeroot or when you run the
> complete build process as root?
The usual reason a package fails with sudo is that it assumes the
$(PWD) macro will be available, pointing to the current working
directory. sudo does not preserve th
Le Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 05:10:40PM -0600, Carlo Segre a écrit :
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Carlo Segre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: sixpack
Hi,
I am preparing a package for "EMBOSS", the European Molecular Biology
Open Source Software suite, which is focused
Hi,
I filled this as #397716 and have received no reply yet, thats why I bring it
up here. Besides the issue brought up in the report it also brings up another
interesting question: is there a way to detect if a buildd is building for
debian or ubuntu? I can make up a rules file for manual buil
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 12:01:10AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Firstly, should we be pointing to the SuS instead of POSIX
> (there is work going on a new version of the SUS), since it is open,
> and readily available on th 'net, and people can readily see it (as
> opposed t
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 08:14:23PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >Reportbug installs who do not have exim installed correctly should be
> >using reportbug's built-in SMTP handling abilities and either relaying
> >to their upstream smtp serv
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 10:11:45AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Real or fake makes no difference. Anything that test id or file
>> permissions will (hopefully) behave the same with fakeroot.
>
> Wrong; otherwise there wouldn't be packages who
34 matches
Mail list logo
