On Thursday 02 November 2006 08:55, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: rt73
> Upstream author : Paul Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Version : 1.0.3.6
> * URL :
> http://www.ralinktech.
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 11:53:32PM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> > Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I can also note why bazaar wont build as root: its test suite
> > > includes a test for the ability to handle read only directories
> > > correctly. As root, anything is writable
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006 23:53:32 -0600, Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > I can also note why bazaar wont build as root: its test suite
>> > includes a test for the ability to handle read only directories
>> > correctly. As root, anything is w
> Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I can also note why bazaar wont build as root: its test suite
> > includes a test for the ability to handle read only directories
> > correctly. As root, anything is writable, so this test fails.
[Goswin von Brederlow]
> That test should add a test
[Norbert Preining]
> | The SSH keys are not synchronized between alioth.debian.org and
> | svn.debian.org.
>
> so this seems to be outdated.
Correct - svn.debian.org _is_ alioth.debian.org, as of last Friday.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
If this is David Downey or you know David Downey, please call John
Hacker at (904) 759-2765 or (800) 499-2502 ASAP. Thanks so much for
your time. We miss you, and just want to see what's up and how
you're doing. Might have something right up your alley, but none the
less would love to sa
On Thursday 02 November 2006 02:56, Blars Blarson wrote:
> Rather than that, I would like to see non-versioned close messages
> depriciated, other than ones that are explicitly so. No change would
> be needed for the majority of cases, only the rare "not a bug" close
> message would need to be dif
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 05:56:16PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >a) for mails to -close or to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to prevent a
> >spammer/malicious
> > person from closing all the bugs or mangling with the BTS in such a way
> > that wo
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>a) for mails to -close or to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to prevent a spammer/malicious
> person from closing all the bugs or mangling with the BTS in such a way
> that would take us some effort to recover
Rather than that, I would like to see n
Mattia Dongili wrote:
> Yes, p4-clockmod is mostly useless for power saving but it helps
> reducing the processor temperature. And this is the only driver working
> for my p4 desktop.
>
Odd. I was unable to measure any temperature reduction either.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
Bruce Sass wrote:
> I don't think that disqualifies it as a solution, it just means there
> would be a transition period while users learn that it is a required
> part of messages sent to the BTS.
Yes it does. People other than Debian developers mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Heck, people who are not e
On Wed November 1 2006 16:20, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> When I have suggested that (sending signed messages to the BTS to be
> accepted for processing) it was
>
> a) for mails to -close or to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to prevent a
> spammer/malicious person from closing all the bugs or mangl
On Thu, 02 Nov 2006, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> a) for mails to -close or to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to prevent a
>spammer/malicious person from closing all the bugs or mangling
>with the BTS in such a way that would take us some effort to
>recover
There's no reason to restrict
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: rt73
Upstream author : Paul Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Version : 1.0.3.6
* URL :
http://www.ralinktech.com/drivers/Linux/RT73_Linux_STA_Drv1.0.3.6.tar.gz
* License : GPL
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 11:51:16PM -0700, Bruce Sass wrote:
> > Decreasing the score at which we ignore messages is trivial, but it
> > means increasing the number of false positives. [And because
> > backscatter is bad, these will be messages which just "disappear",
> > unless some (massochistic)
On Wed, 01 Nov 2006 20:57:15 +0100
Jan Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Jan Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: dns-flood-detector
[...]
> Description : DNS Flood Detector was developed to detect abusive usage
> levels on high tra
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 07:00:03PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: mach
[..]
> Description : make a chroot of a rpm-based distribution
This sounds like rpmstrap?
> Included at this moment is th
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: mach
Version : 0.9.0.2
Upstream Authors : Thomas Vander Stichele,
Ville Skyttä,
Jeff Pitman,
Rudi Chiarito,
Ma
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jan Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: dns-flood-detector
Version : 1.12
Upstream Author : Dennis Opacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.adotout.com/
* License : GPL 2
Programming Lang: C
Description
Hi,
It has recently come to my attention that nfs-utils (which is priority
standard) cannot depend on ucf, since ucf is of priority optional.
I can only see four solutions for this:
a) Ignore the problem for etch, figure out what do to afterwards.
b) Downgrade nfs-utils' priority (but I don't
If a -dev package is architecture independent -- for example contains
only a symlink from the .so to the .so.X file and possibly a .pc file
-- what's the best dependency on the libfooX package, keeping in mind
binnmuability?
Depends: libfooX (>= ${source:Version}), libfooX (<< ${source:Version}.1
* martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> also sprach Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.10.31.2103 +0100]:
> > > How are certificate files not intended to be modified? If they
> > > expire? If they are incomplete?
> >
> > If they expire then they should be updated by the package.
>
> T
also sprach Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.10.31.2103 +0100]:
> > How are certificate files not intended to be modified? If they
> > expire? If they are incomplete?
>
> If they expire then they should be updated by the package.
The problem with ca-certificate is that it follows policies
OCA9QzM9QzE9RDI9QzU9Q0EhISE/PQA=?=
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 12:45:24 -0060
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="koi8-r";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Expres
PUNDID1EMD1DMT1EMj1ENSA9RDI9QzE9REEsPz0=?=
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 11:37:19 -0120
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="koi8-r";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlo
Your message dated Wed, 1 Nov 2006 13:13:40 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388569: printing working again
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
QT1DND1DNT1EQj1EOCw/PQA=?=
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 12:17:10 -0420
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="koi8-r";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2
PUM3PUNDPUMxPURCPUM1PUNFPz0=?=
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 12:13:40 -0060
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="koi8-r";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > How come it never outputs p4_clockmod? I use that happily on several
> > different machines.
> >
>
> I can confirm I've tried it on a machine. The performance impact was
> substantial (at least if I allowed it to go t
Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 23:16 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 08:02:22AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> > While I fully agree with you on all points, I think that this should be
>> > discussed post-etch with the general question o
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 10:07:24AM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> > Peter Palfrader wrote:
> >
> >> How come it never outputs p4_clockmod? I use that happily on several
> >> different machines.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > I can confirm I've tried it on a machine. The per
Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Peter Palfrader wrote:
>
>> How come it never outputs p4_clockmod? I use that happily on several
>> different machines.
>>
>>
>
> I can confirm I've tried it on a machine. The performance impact was
> substantial (at least if I allowed it to go to its lowest
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 23:16 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 08:02:22AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > While I fully agree with you on all points, I think that this should be
> > discussed post-etch with the general question of "in which environment
> > are packages supposed
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Oleksandr Moskalenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: bashdb
Version : 3.1.0.6
Upstream Author : R. Bernstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://bashdb.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Bash
Descri
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request assistance with maintaining the cdw package. It has a bad
thread implementation as far as I can tell; thus when writing the CD
with one thread and checking the progress from an other it segfaults.
Upstream finished its development, but I would like to see i
[Martin F Krafft]
> I consider this a bug, and even release-critical, and would say that
> ca-certificates should use ucf to maintain the certificates in
> /etc/ssl/certs. Arguments against that are to keep /etc small, but
> at 444k I don't see ca-certificates being a culprit.
>
> Comments?
I wou
36 matches
Mail list logo
