[ Off-Topic, sorry ]
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 11:43:51AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> If it's not renamed, we can't legally ship it. What, IYO, should be
> done to ship the existing program currently known as Firefox?
FoxFire or FoxInFire, maybe ;)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 08:36:14AM +0300, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-10-15 at 16:09 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > Ok. If I have not managed to scare you off yet, then I hope you would
> > like to get the packages and help us find bugs. Here is what you do:
> [...]
>
> Also:
>
Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * sean finney
>
> | is this even remotely acceptable? i had the impressions that packages
> | must not assume the inner workings of dpkg. but, i can't back this up
> | with anything in policy from what i can tell, hence the posting of
> | this quest
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: teamspeak-client
Version : 2.0.32
Upstream Author : TeamSpeak Systems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.goteamspeak.com/
* License : non-free
Description
On Sun, 2006-10-15 at 16:09 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> Ok. If I have not managed to scare you off yet, then I hope you would
> like to get the packages and help us find bugs. Here is what you do:
[...]
Also:
* The project web page is at
http://pkg-cyrus-sasl2.alioth.debian.
Argh. I forget to set Mail-Followup-To properly on the last message.
Please don't reply to every single package's address.
Regards,
-Roberto
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 01:18:02AM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> Greetings all,
>
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http:/
Greetings all,
As part of the transition to the new cyrus-sasl packages I have built
all the package which expressed some sort of dependency on any of the
cyrus-sasl2 packages. These were built in a clean Sid pbuilder. I have
created a chart that show each source package name, whether the
depend
Hola, no se si me recuerdas ... espero noticias tuyas
saludos,
bye
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 00:25:28 +0200, Federico Di Gregorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Il giorno dom, 15/10/2006 alle 11.41 -0500, Manoj Srivastava ha
> scritto:
>>
>> If taking a stand on principle is childish, thank god I do not
>> agree with your camp.
> Don't generalize my words trying to ha
"Sam Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It is unfortunate because of the user confusion that it will
> cause. IMO, the firefox package should not be renamed to iceweasel.
If it's not renamed, we can't legally ship it. What, IYO, should be
done to ship the existing program currently known as Fi
Hi,
> > It will be a fork in the following senses:
> >
> > * no inclusion of trademarked Mozilla artowrk
> > * backporting of security fixes to declared stable version
>
> Wouldn't it be easier to just do the usual .dfsg-dance with the original
> upstream tarball? I still fail to see why we ne
> I have been reading about Dunc Tank. I did it because I'm seeing lots
> of messages of disgusting, lots of packages have been orphaned, and
> blog entries that have a kind of upset, too.
>
> I would be glad if you give me your opinions about Dunc Tank, or
> whatever is causing problems. I think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/15/06 14:28, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 01:10:33PM -0400, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ron Johnson wrote:
>>> Why *shouldn't* KDE, GNOME, Firefox/Iceweasel, Tbird, and anything
>>> that requires Mesa/OpenGL, and all o
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 00:22:53 +0200, Lech Karol Pawłaszek wrote:
> On Monday 16 October 2006 00:07, Jacobo Tarrio wrote:
>> El domingo, 15 de octubre de 2006 a las 22:06:21 +0200, Bastian Venthur
>> escribía:
>> > I've read on several blogs that IceWeasel will be based on a fork of
>> > FireFox and
Does anyone know the cause of the following? I haven't filed a bug report as
I'm not sure which package to file it against. It appears that a grub config
file problem may be preventing package removal.
Please CC me on replies.
Removing linux-image-2.6.17-2-686 ...
Purging configuration files
Il giorno dom, 15/10/2006 alle 11.41 -0500, Manoj Srivastava ha scritto:
>
> If taking a stand on principle is childish, thank god I do not
> agree with your camp.
Don't generalize my words trying to have me say what I didn't say. It is
a old and well-establsihed practice [sophists wher
On Monday 16 October 2006 00:07, Jacobo Tarrio wrote:
> El domingo, 15 de octubre de 2006 a las 22:06:21 +0200, Bastian Venthur
escribía:
> > I've read on several blogs that IceWeasel will be based on a fork of
> > FireFox and not just on vanilla FireFox. Is this true and if yes, why?
>
> AIUI, i
El domingo, 15 de octubre de 2006 a las 22:06:21 +0200, Bastian Venthur
escribía:
> I've read on several blogs that IceWeasel will be based on a fork of
> FireFox and not just on vanilla FireFox. Is this true and if yes, why?
AIUI, it will be vanilla Firefox minus logo, minus "Firefox" name, pl
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:33:48PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> I'm now working on producing something that looks like a gcc test case.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=393275
I'll now upload a new version of tagcoll2 that builds with -O1 on Alpha,
working around the problem.
The
* sean finney
| is this even remotely acceptable? i had the impressions that packages
| must not assume the inner workings of dpkg. but, i can't back this up
| with anything in policy from what i can tell, hence the posting of
| this question.
Before responding, please read the bug report (390
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 10:06:21PM +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've read on several blogs that IceWeasel will be based on a fork of
>> FireFox and not just on vanilla FireFox. Is this true and if yes, why?
>>
>> I hope this will not result in a flamewar, I
Hello ,
Learn how to make 1.5 - 3.5k per day from home.
800.513.3876
Call me at my number if you can return calls.
Thanks Alot,
Tod Cusack
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 10:06:21PM +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've read on several blogs that IceWeasel will be based on a fork of
> FireFox and not just on vanilla FireFox. Is this true and if yes, why?
>
> I hope this will not result in a flamewar, I'm just interested in the
> reas
Greetings fellow Debian users and developers,
The Debian Cyrus SASL Team is working at a breakneck pace to try and get
the new upstream version ready in time for Etch. For that to happen, we
need the help of brave souls to test these packages. Here are some
reasons why you might want to help us
Hi,
I've read on several blogs that IceWeasel will be based on a fork of
FireFox and not just on vanilla FireFox. Is this true and if yes, why?
I hope this will not result in a flamewar, I'm just interested in the
reasons if an why we prefer the fork over the original source as base
for our IceWe
Hello,
Package: malsync
Description: Allows a PalmOS PDA to synchronize to a MAL server
MalSync is a command line tool that allows Palm Pilots to synchronize
to the AvantGo (http://www.avantgo.com/) or Puma Technologies
(http://www.pumatech.com/is_desktop_main.html) servers or any other
Mobile
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 01:10:33PM -0400, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Why *shouldn't* KDE, GNOME, Firefox/Iceweasel, Tbird, and anything
> > that requires Mesa/OpenGL, and all of Charles Plessy's scientific
> > packages be marked do_not_build on 68k/Coldfire & ARM
Hi *,
I have been reading about Dunc Tank. I did it because I'm seeing lots
of messages of disgusting, lots of packages have been orphaned, and
blog entries that have a kind of upset, too.
I would be glad if you give me your opinions about Dunc Tank, or
whatever is causing problems. I think Du
Sam Hocevar a écrit :
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006, Fabrice Lorrain wrote:
Checking for newer versions at packages.debian.org...
Your version of wmaker (0.92.0-6) is newer than that in Debian! Do you
still want to file a report [y|N|q|?]?
Just packages.debian.org that's not up to date.
Thanks
Miriam Ruiz a écrit :
--- Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 02:56:56AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
The following packages are also available:
- sdcc
If you're serious about all this, I might be interested in sdcc.
I am really serious about that. I am
Some extra info:
The GDB stack trace of that abort call:
http://paste.debian.net/14928
shows what looks like a gcc problem. (note that I use -gstabs+ instead
of -g to get the code linked in a bearable time, but gdb can usually
cope with that)
Rebuilding with -O0 shows no problems, and the test
hey all,
i recently saw that apache2.2-common's prerm script has the following
block of text:
= = = = =
# YAY, MORE EVILNESS
rm -f /var/lib/dpkg/info/apache2-common.postrm
= = = = =
and the following from the changelog:
= = = = =
apache2 (2.2.3-2) unstable; urgency=low
* rm -f /var/lib/dpkg/
--- Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 02:56:56AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> The following packages are also available:
> - sdcc
If you're serious about all this, I might be interested in sdcc.
Miry
__
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 06:38:16AM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> >
> > But now, I can stop! There will be people doing my work! And they will
> > win money! They will do my translations on debian installation manual,
> > on the debconf templates, they are going to close my RC bugs and other
Ron Johnson wrote:
> Why *shouldn't* KDE, GNOME, Firefox/Iceweasel, Tbird, and anything
> that requires Mesa/OpenGL, and all of Charles Plessy's scientific
> packages be marked do_not_build on 68k/Coldfire & ARM?
Well, just for example, I know of people who run firefox on arm.
--
see shy jo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My work is in Catalan translations, not Spanish, and I was talking
ironically. I really think Debian project is more important than all
this. The time will show anyone on its place.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8D
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:27:14 +0200, Federico Di Gregorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Il giorno dom, 15/10/2006 alle 13.18 +0200, Josselin Mouette ha
> scritto:
>> Are you willing to maintain these packages or what?
> Sincerely no. I just felt extremely insulted by your (and other
> people) chil
Le dimanche 15 octobre 2006 à 16:27 +0200, Federico Di Gregorio a
écrit :
> that very people just quit. Why? because the vote didn't turned
> out as they wanted.
I find it extremely insulting that after weeks of discussions there are
still morons trying to reduce the outcome to something like "peo
Federico Di Gregorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You are wrong. The people who quit after the vote decided to quit
>> *before* the vote took place, whatever the outcome.
>
> Why they quit after, then? And especially, why they voted?
Maybe because they felt it was important for the future of th
Il giorno dom, 15/10/2006 alle 16.43 +0200, Julien BLACHE ha scritto:
> > childish attitude. During the last few months I've seen people talk
> > about principles and democracy and other moral stuff and now, after the
> > vote, that very people just quit. Why? because the vote didn't turned
> > out
Federico Di Gregorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> childish attitude. During the last few months I've seen people talk
> about principles and democracy and other moral stuff and now, after the
> vote, that very people just quit. Why? because the vote didn't turned
> out as they wanted. Because ther
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 02:56:56AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 11:21:45AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > >Hi all,
> > >
> > >As Debian^WDunc-tank experiments with funding, I have loosed motivation
> > >to spend so much time on my packages. I h
Il giorno dom, 15/10/2006 alle 13.18 +0200, Josselin Mouette ha scritto:
> Are you willing to maintain these packages or what?
Sincerely no. I just felt extremely insulted by your (and other people)
childish attitude. During the last few months I've seen people talk
about principles and democracy
Attention ,
Find out how to generate 1.5 - 3.5k per day from your house.
800.439.1088
Phone me at my number if you can return calls.
Thank you,
Daniel Davison
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 06:38:16AM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> >
> > But now, I can stop! There will be people doing my work! And they will
> > win money! They will do my translations on debian installation manual,
> > on the debconf templates, they are going to close my RC bugs and other
>
Good Morning ,
Find out how to make 1.5 - 3.5k a day from home.
800.671.9007
Call me at my number if you can return phone calls.
Goodbye,
Raymundo Grisham
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I maintain libgphoto2 and way back when I adopted the package it has
manual instructions and they were about creating a 'camera' group and
so on.
I added default hotplug (and now udev) support and created 'camera'
group in postinst. At the same time there was much work on 'project
utopia'
Fabrice Lorrain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> $ reportbug wmaker
[...]
> Getting status for wmaker...
> Checking for newer versions at packages.debian.org...
> Your version of wmaker (0.92.0-6) is newer than that in Debian! Do you
> still want to file a report [y|N|q|?]?
> H, how come ?
[...]
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006, Fabrice Lorrain wrote:
> Checking for newer versions at packages.debian.org...
> Your version of wmaker (0.92.0-6) is newer than that in Debian! Do you
> still want to file a report [y|N|q|?]?
Just packages.debian.org that's not up to date.
--
Sam.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
The results of *all 4 GR* show me that I don't share the goals of the
Well, I read the 4 GRs so that only one of them is connected to the
goal of the project which was stated as "building a free operating"
system and the other three GRs just decide ab
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 09:33:51AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > If an Amiga (using the unaccelerated fb driver?) is running as an X
> > Terminal for a powerful, modern box, the Amiga would need to process
> > the OpenGL commands, no?
>
> There are no amigas with unaccelerated FB driver I
Le dimanche 15 octobre 2006 à 11:38 +0200, Sam Hocevar a écrit :
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2006, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>
> > * libpng - nightmare of the security team. Upstream developers
> > seem to have recently understood some packaging issues, but with
> > their erratic behavio
Le dimanche 15 octobre 2006 à 10:44 +0200, Federico Di Gregorio a
écrit :
> Il giorno dom, 15/10/2006 alle 02.56 +0200, Josselin Mouette ha scritto:
> > I'm orphaning the following packages. I'm no longer interested in
> > maintaining them unless the project pays me for it.
>
> Ah ah ah. *Wath* *
Good Morning ,
Find out how to make 1.5 - 3.5k daily from home.
800.671.9007
Contact me at my number if you can return calls.
Thanks,
Mr Pilger
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006, Fabrice Lorrain wrote:
> $ reportbug wmaker
> *** Welcome to reportbug. Use ? for help at prompts. ***
> Detected character set: us-ascii
> Please change your locale if this is incorrect.
>
> Using 'Fabrice Lorrain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' as your from address.
> Getting status f
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006, Miguel Gea Milvaques wrote:
>
> But now, I can stop! There will be people doing my work! And they will
> win money! They will do my translations on debian installation manual,
> on the debconf templates, they are going to close my RC bugs and other
> non important bugs.
Y
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 11:38:33AM +0200, Miguel Gea Milvaques wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> I've been working to get Etch out more than I never did.
>
>
> But now, I can stop! There will be people doing my work! And they will
> win money! They will do my translations on debian installation manual,
> on th
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> * libpng - nightmare of the security team. Upstream developers
> seem to have recently understood some packaging issues, but with
> their erratic behavior and stupid things libpng-using
> applications do, it is likely to
$ reportbug wmaker
*** Welcome to reportbug. Use ? for help at prompts. ***
Detected character set: us-ascii
Please change your locale if this is incorrect.
Using 'Fabrice Lorrain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' as your from address.
Getting status for wmaker...
Checking for newer versions at packages.debi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/15/06 04:24, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 03:16:04AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
[snip]
> I don't think this is good. Basically a user should be able to choose if
> s/he would like to use Gnome or KDE. Wookeys proposal was
* Kevin Mark
| IIRC the buildds do not have a weight attached to each package to
| determine its order in the buildd queue. Would the introduction of a
| weight, where resource intensive packages get put on the bottom and are
| built at 'slow' periods help?
This will easily cause problems for
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 10/15/06 02:33, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> On 10/15/06 00:03, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
"Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 07:30:15PM +0200, Holg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi *,
I've been working to get Etch out more than I never did.
But now, I can stop! There will be people doing my work! And they will
win money! They will do my translations on debian installation manual,
on the debconf templates, they are going to
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 05:35:57PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > However there are some packages which are clearly not sensible on some
> > arches. Numerical analysis software in general on arm is a good
> > example of this class. Arm hardware is generally slow and more
> > seriously has no floatin
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 03:16:04AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Because it is perfectly fine to run kde on such a system. Anything
> > that can run gnome can run kde. Anything that can run X can run kde I
> > would even say. Kicking one alternative for something (like kde) but
> > not others (lik
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Come on!
I'm helping to this Orphan party!
The people are going to win in Debian can maintain this one too:
* libmatheval. As h5utils as been orphaned, and libmatheval has it as
reverse depends, It will be a good idea that the same person maintain
t
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:03:59AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> I think it should be in the porters control what packages to build for
> an arch with some guidelines what sort of packages can be removed
> without loosing release status. For example removing KDE would not be
> OK. Removal s
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 07:30:15PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Saturday 14 October 2006 12:51, Wookey wrote:
> > Nevertheless I think it is clear that we do need mechanisms to keep
> > the load and package set appropriate for slower arches. If we design
> > the mechanism properly I would hope
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 11:51:49AM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> On 2006-10-14 12:06 +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> > It doesn't make much sense to build all Desktop related packages for an arch
> > that is mainly used remotely or as an embedded device. I don't think that
> > anyone will run KDE on to
Hi,
> * libpng - nightmare of the security team. Upstream developers
> seem to have recently understood some packaging issues, but with
> their erratic behavior and stupid things libpng-using
> applications do, it is likely to break at each new upstream
> rele
Il giorno dom, 15/10/2006 alle 02.56 +0200, Josselin Mouette ha scritto:
> I'm orphaning the following packages. I'm no longer interested in
> maintaining them unless the project pays me for it.
Ah ah ah. *Wath* *a* *dork!* (Or did I miss a smiley?)
--
Federico Di Gregorio
Hi Josselin,
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 02:56:52AM +0200, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I'm orphaning the following packages. I'm no longer interested in
> maintaining them unless the project pays me for it.
>
> * h5utils
> * hdf5 - very useful tool for finding ICEs in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/15/06 02:33, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On 10/15/06 00:03, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>> "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 07:30:15PM +0200, Holger
Carlo Segre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
>> The interest with debtags is that it allows to change the policy for a
>> package without needing an upload or the intervention of the maintainer.
>> This way, the decision of not building could be taken by t
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 10/15/06 00:03, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 07:30:15PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> [snip]
>> I think it should be in the porters control what packages to
>> build for
Hi,
> I need documentation on what kind of state a bug can be in.
>
> pending: field looks like what I'm looking for, but it is not the same
> as what the index.db file has.
>
> pending -- 'open' bugs
> done -- 'done' bug
> forwarded -- 'forwarded' bugs
>
> Is this intentional and where is this
76 matches
Mail list logo
