> It is easier to turn on something that is already installed;
> we can add commented out lines to /etc/pam.d/login, for example, and
> tell people to just uncomment the commented lines in place.
Supported by shadow maintainers. If you think they're needed, they'll
be here (I doubt it
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: kidbasic
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Ian Paul Larsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://kidbasic.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 09:02:20PM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> BTW, if you have a look at the 'debian/copyright' file you will notice
> that debian-unofficial.org is allowed to distribute those packages,
> although the source code has been modified.
Personally, *I* think that still fails the
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 05:37:10AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Would you mind sharing the -39 or deb-src with us?
xv isn't distributable by me as I'm not the copyright holder. Whoever
controls where the original -26 source lives may not be OK either, but
that's not for me to say.
--
Marc Wilso
On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 01:04:50 +0200, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Oct 07, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The size of the .debs for targeted policy is 2185702 Bytes, and
>> adds seven packages to the standard install. No special
> While I like much the idea of having
On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 01:56:53 +0200, Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Am Samstag 07 Oktober 2006 00:35 schrieb Manoj Srivastava:
>> We are at a point where we can support a targeted SELinux policy,
>> at least in permissive mode. Everything seems to work for me; I
>> can fire up targe
Am Samstag 07 Oktober 2006 00:35 schrieb Manoj Srivastava:
> We are at a point where we can support a targeted SELinux
> policy, at least in permissive mode. Everything seems to work for
> me; I can fire up targeted SELinux UML's and only see a few harmless
> log messages.
What do those look
This one time, at band camp, Manoj Srivastava said:
> As per policy, I am raising a balloon about ths issue; I think
> if we ship vacation, finger, and sharutils, we can also ship
> mandatory acess controls in the standard distribution :)
I say go ahead, FWIW.
--
--
On Oct 07, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The size of the .debs for targeted policy is 2185702 Bytes,
> and adds seven packages to the standard install. No special
While I like much the idea of having solid and easy to deploy
selinux-related packages, I object to installin
Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am 2006-10-04 18:08:50, schrieb Alexey Feldgendler:
>
> > Why not just stop using apt-get? aptitude can do everything the
> > same as apt-get and even supports the same command line
> > parameters.
>
> And HOW do you install/remove packages if the TUI
Hi,
We are at a point where we can support a targeted SELinux
policy, at least in permissive mode. Everything seems to work for
me; I can fire up targeted SELinux UML's and only see a few harmless
log messages.
I brought this over on the debian-installer mailing list, and
sug
upstart is looking interesting and it might just as well replace
sysvinit for etch+1. Or at least be an alternative.
In order to enable this change, we're facing the "To continue type
in the phrase 'Yes, do as I say!'" problem because sysvinit is
marked essential.
Jeroen said this has been discus
Hi!
You might want to check my xv packages at
http://ftp-master.debian-unofficial.org/debian-archive/packages/xv/
They have the so-called 'jumbo patchset' applied and compile well with
gcc-4.0 (not tested with gcc-4.1 yet, but should compile, too).
The packages were compiled before the xorg tra
Bas Wijnen wrote:
> http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-beyond-pkging.en.html#s-mia-qa,
> and that mentions debian-devel should be asked before [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also, Cc:ing the guy or the bug number is nice.
--
·''`. If I can't dance to it, it's not my revolution
:
Quoting Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Gunnar Wolf dijo [Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 03:29:30PM -0500]:
Hi,
(...)
GAH!
Sorry... Please ignore this mail.
I felt I researched thoroughly on coin's status, didn't it? Well, yes,
but I didn't pay attention that there are two different source
packages:
Good Afternoon,
Luxury Gifts that have full manufacturer's warranty.
More than 14 companies and 200+ models to choose from.
Omega - Cartier - Fendi
Gucci - Louis Vuitton - Tiffany & Co.
http://geocities.com/Denver34_s616/
74 - 82% off retail & no Fedex charges.
Thank you,
Mason Labovitz
--
Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> libavcodec had several vulnerabilities and without doubt it'll have more in
> the next 30 months after Etch release. So it's absolutely necessary to
> link dynamically. (Many do already, e.g. xine-lib).
> I'll file RC bugs for any packages still emb
reassign 391359 qa.debian.org
thanks
On Friday, October 06, 2006 9:51 AM, Raúl Sánchez Siles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Package: general
> Severity: wishlist
>
> With aptitude changelog is quite easy to know the latest modifications
> of a package, but it quite often refers to new upstream re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 391359 www.debian.org
Bug#391359: general: packages.debian.org package view could have a link to see
the source changelog.
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `www.debian.org'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
You ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
MK> ...and if you have a computer on which aptitude do not want to
MK> run in the terminal? I have two Servers where this is the case.
Do aptitude checks terminal even for 'aptitude install' or 'aptitude
search'?
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
Package: general
Severity: wishlist
With aptitude changelog is quite easy to know the latest modifications
of a package, but it quite often refers to new upstream release.
In order to see the upstream release changes I have to either download
the source code or install the package and go to
/usr/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/05/06 23:25, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 10:57:28PM -0700, Jiri Klouda wrote:
>> I just wanted to ask when xv is going to be updated
>
> It isn't.
>
>> or do I need to compile from sources?
>
> You can use this to fetch the la
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 02:42:43AM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> And HOW do you install/remove packages if the TUI from aptitude crashs?
You file a bug at the appropriate severity against aptitude?
> I do not know how aptitude is working and whether it use ncurses or
> slang but it segfaults a
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 12:17:23PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> A trivial patch would be:
Patch applied (thanks Raphael!), together with an added entry for the
Monotone VCS (I'm kinda scared by the amount of VCS produced by the free
software community in recent years )
Cheers.
--
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 12:57:51AM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> I would like to know what happen with him?
I don't know anything about Stan, but AFAIK these sort of queries should be
sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], so they don't show up on google. It's not a nice
thing to have your name mentioned
Hello Evan,
I will subscribe to the list and support it.
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
Am 2006-10-02 16:49:14, schrieb Evan Prodromou:
> So, for those of you who want to see Creative Commons l
Am 2006-10-04 15:38:18, schrieb Rolf Kutz:
> apt-get is faster and uses less resources.
I have a IBM TP760ED (233Mhz, 128 MB) where aptitude
need arround 3 minutes to let me do anything...
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan Network
Deb
Am 2006-10-04 18:08:50, schrieb Alexey Feldgendler:
> Why not just stop using apt-get? aptitude can do everything the
> same as apt-get and even supports the same command line parameters.
And HOW do you install/remove packages if the TUI from aptitude crashs?
I do not know how aptitude is working
Am 2006-10-04 16:00:28, schrieb Mike Hommey:
> Interesting... here, it tends to be the contrary. apt-get wants to
> install a whole lot of packages on dist-upgrade, while aptitude is able
> to pull the minimum required.
Not here. Only the bare minimum.
[ '/etc/apt/apt.conf' ]---
Am 2006-10-03 16:26:46, schrieb Michal Cihar:
> deborphan looks simmilar to what you describe. Anyway if you use
> aptitude instead of apt-get it tracks all that automatically and you
> don't have to guess.
...and if you have a computer on which aptitude do not want to run
in the terminal? I hav
Hello,
I am developing applications using xdialog but version 2.2 has
several bugs (e.g. in "treeview" where it works only with level
0-3 but adding a 4th level will screw up the List) which are
solved in version 2.3 which is availlable since 3 month.
Unfortunatly Stan has hot respond to my Bugre
Hello:
I don't think this bug could only be considered as a minor bug, since it
prevented me to enter into kde and once you are used to apps inside a
graphical environmnet it's quite difficult to find a solution yourself.
Thank you.
--
Raúl Sánchez Siles
pgpMaUQd4mZm6.pgp
Description: PGP s
32 matches
Mail list logo
