mueller: dictd (>= 1.10.1) | any-other-dict-server dependency

Gentlemen, what's the best way to handle the following dependency problem: mueller7-dict package is UTF-8 encoded and requires one of the following dict servers to operate: * dictd (<< 1.10.1) with --locale=xx_XX.UTF-8 in config * dictd (>= 1.10.1) * serpento (as the only one more dict server in

Work-needing packages report for Sep 22, 2006

The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the last week. Total number of orphaned packages: 304 (new: 15) Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 99 (new: 7) Total number of packages request

Bug#388701: ITP: beryl -- Beryl Project compositing window manager

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Shawn Starr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: beryl Version : 0.1.0 Upstream Author : Quinn Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.beryl-project.net/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: C Description : Beryl

Re: 2.4 vs. 2.6 (was: Re: Moving /var/run to a tmpfs?)

On 9/17/06, Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: A good hint for such cases is to actually report such bugs to the driver developers. Did you? You must have pretty uncommon hardware, though, as many use 2.6 kernels without such problems... I have an old server with 2.4 because 2.6 won't

Re: Compatibility between Debian amd64 and other distributions

On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 02:50:35AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > But running Debian binaries on other distributions remains a > problem. For example static binaries that use libnss* plugins will > fail to find those plugins on other systems. Copying the debian libc6 > to your ~/lib/ dir on a

Re: XS-X-Vcs-XXX field not (yet) announced

On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 01:04:59AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > I'm a casual user of distributed VCS (used sparingly hg and baz here), > but I don't see how this is related to the field as we are intending it. > But maybe it's just because I'm not that familiar with them, let me know > if thi

Compatibility between Debian amd64 and other distributions

Dear release team and DDs, I submitted a trivial patch for glibc in bug#387446 to increase the compatibility between debian amd64 and other distributions. The maintainer has reassign this to 'general' saying: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Actually there is nothing wrong with the gl

Re: XS-X-Vcs-XXX field not (yet) announced

Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > As to it being an XS- field, dpkg-dev doesn't warn at all about building > > packages with such a field (unlike an XB- field), so I don't really > > care, although it seems it would be better to lose the XS- if possible. > > Note that we were more discussing about los

Re: Debian ISOs

On 9/22/06, Anthony L. Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (Oops, hit the send key combo before finishing, sorry). Here's a brief refresher on metalinks & how it could be useful for Debian ISO distribution: 'Metalink makes complex download pages obsolete by replacing long lists of download mirrors

RE: Debian ISOs

(Oops, hit the send key combo before finishing, sorry). Here's a brief refresher on metalinks & how it could be useful for Debian ISO distribution: 'Metalink makes complex download pages obsolete by replacing long lists of download mirrors and BitTorrent trackers with a single .metalink file. As

Re: Media players in Debian

"César Martínez Izquierdo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > First of all, I don't have time to send bug reports for all the bugs I > find (although I send most of them, when I have to choose I send to > packages which I usually use). > Specially, when I want to see a film, I really want to see the fi

RE: Debian ISOs

Here's a brief refresher on metalinks & how it could be useful for Debian ISO distribution: aria2 is in unstable and testing so people can install & use it easily, thanks to Patrick. I hope some people can try it out! apt-get install aria2 aria2c http://www.metalinker.org/samples/debian-31r2-i

Re: XS-X-Vcs-XXX field not (yet) announced

On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 04:18:56PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > As far as using this field for svn repos, I assume that it should be to > an anonymous-friendly version of the repo if possible (svn:// not > svn+ssh://). Should it link to the trunk, rather than the head of the > repo? I think so and tha

Re: XS-X-Vcs-XXX field not (yet) announced

On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 03:42:47PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > That doesn't work so well for heavily distributed systems such as darcs. > In darcs, every repo is a branch, and every branch is a repo. Every > repo represents exactly 1 branch. Of course, branching is cheap, so > creating repos is

Re: Media players in Debian

On 9/22/06, Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "Andrew Donnellan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It would be great if upstream would actually care about legal issues, > licenses and patents in particular. Upstream does care for legal issues, and patents in particular. Check the mplayer

Re: XS-X-Vcs-XXX field not (yet) announced

On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 09:43:37PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:21:22PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > > I would also like to raise a question: does it make any sense to be able > > to list two URLs, one for the Debian branch and one for the upstream > > branch? > >

Re: XS-X-Vcs-XXX field not (yet) announced

As far as using this field for svn repos, I assume that it should be to an anonymous-friendly version of the repo if possible (svn:// not svn+ssh://). Should it link to the trunk, rather than the head of the repo? I think so and that's how your example gives it. As to it being an XS- field, dpkg-d

Re: Contact et distribution

Le jeudi 21 septembre 2006 à 10:57 -0700, Sammy Nzazi a écrit : > Bonjour, > Nous avons commencé une serie d'études sur le lunix et nous voulons en > faire le sytème le plus repandu dans notre pays République > Démocratique du Congo. Aussi nous vous demandons de nous aider en > nous envoyant 20 cd

Bug#388673: ITP: pwman3 -- Command line password manager

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Julien Louis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: pwman3 Version : 0.0.5 Upstream Author : Ivan Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://pwman.bleurgh.com * License : GPL Programming Lang: Python Description : Comma

Re: XS-X-Vcs-XXX field not (yet) announced

On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:21:22PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > I would also like to raise a question: does it make any sense to be able > to list two URLs, one for the Debian branch and one for the upstream > branch? I've thought about similar issues. I made up my mind about these questions being

Re: XS-X-Vcs-XXX field not (yet) announced

On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 09:02:31PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > My doubt was on the line: "who am I to suggest a non X- field to be > added to Sources files"? If no one has objections on the field > XS-Vcs-XXX-Url I will add support for it and document its usage (without > the "X-". > > So,

Bug#388569: general: always printed in letter format

Maybe this posting is related to this bug? -- .''`. gerhard oettl on Debian/Gnu Linux : :' : `. `'` gpg key: 1024D/D59131AA 2002-06-18 `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscrib

Re: XS-X-Vcs-XXX field not (yet) announced

On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 08:46:51PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > If you use the X- prefix and the field gains widespread acceptance, a > transition is needed. Not really, being the PTS the only piece of software considering the field it would be enough to document the non X- version and support b

Re: Policy regarding virtual packages

Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Following some discussion with Marco d'Itri about inetd, I'd like to > put forward some more general thoughts on virtual package handling for > some comments. > > Currently, virtual packages (such as mail-transport-agent) cannot be > specified by themselve

Re: XS-X-Vcs-XXX field not (yet) announced

On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 12:55:01PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > I hadn't even thought about the reference. That's indeed a good way to > go, but the problem with doing that only is that existing developers > won't learn about it very quickly. I wasn't really sure that this might be of *that* inte

Re: XS-X-Vcs-XXX field not (yet) announced

* Stefano Zacchiroli: > As an answer specific for this case. The field is still an X- field, > because I actually don't know how and if it should be standardized. If you use the X- prefix and the field gains widespread acceptance, a transition is needed. Debian might be able to do this in a coor

Re: Media players in Debian

[César Martínez Izquierdo] > Another reason is... lots of Debian users download mplayer from > Marillat or other sources (maybe Marillat may provide some stats)... popcon.debian.org can provide stats. Of 16473 machines submitting info, 3555 (22%) have the mplayer package installed. There are 84

Re: XS-X-Vcs-XXX field not (yet) announced

On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 06:39:35PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 11:17:56AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > > This is an *excellent* idea, but a terrible way of introducing it. Why > > was it posted only on a blog, and not to -- at least -- debian-devel? > > > > I'm grow

Re: Media players in Debian

Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 01:12:02PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > This is pretty much the only thing stopping Debian from distributing >> > it - it may actually be illegal [...] >> >> The problematic parts regarding patents are

Re: Need for darcs.debian.org?

On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 07:13:54PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote: > > > > It could be useful, I think. How would one push to it -- over ssh > > or with darcs send? > > ATM, for what is the CL-Debian packages I'm rsyncing my local > repositories to the Alioth ones, because there's only one maintainer,

Processed: Bug#388805: RFP: please package mod_auth_xradius

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 388805 RFP: please package mod_auth_xradius Bug#388805: libapache2-mod-auth-radius missing Changed Bug title. > reassign 388805 wnpp Bug#388805: RFP: please package mod_auth_xradius Bug reassigned from package `apache2' to `wnpp'. > severity 3

Bug#388805: Info received (Bug#388805: RFP: please package mod_auth_xradius)

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the package maintainer(s) and to other interested parties to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): Debian Apache Maintainers If y

Re: Need for darcs.debian.org?

Hello! On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 18:17:56 +0200, John Goerzen wrote: > On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 03:14:02PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote: >> one would be better, similar to the SVN one: >> >> http://darcs.debian.org/$GROUP/$PACKAGE >> >> Now, the questions: >> >> 1) could it be useful and will it be ado

Re: Problem including (linux-kernel-headers 2.6.17)

On Sep 21, Martin Kittel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have no experience in this area, so I am just wondering: are > user-space applications not supposed to include any headers below > /usr/include/asm Yes. The application is buggy. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Problem including (linux-kernel-headers 2.6.17)

Am Donnerstag 21 September 2006 20:09 schrieb Martin Kittel: > In file included from /usr/include/asm-x86_64/vsyscall.h:4, >                  from /usr/include/asm/vsyscall.h:8, >                  from /usr/include/asm-x86_64/timex.h:11, >                  from /usr/include/asm/timex.h:8, >        

Re: Media players in Debian

On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 01:12:02PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Andrew Donnellan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > It would be great if upstream would actually care about legal issues, > > licenses and patents in particular. > > Upstream does care for legal issues, and

XS-X-Vcs-XXX field not (yet) announced

On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 11:17:56AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > This is an *excellent* idea, but a terrible way of introducing it. Why > was it posted only on a blog, and not to -- at least -- debian-devel? > > I'm growing increasingly annoyed with things that are announced only on > blogs and no

Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#387446: glibc: Please compile for (/usr)/lib64 on amd64 as per FHS

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 387446 amd64 system not compliant with FHS Bug#387446: glibc: Please compile for (/usr)/lib64 on amd64 as per FHS Changed Bug title. > Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > > Processing commands

Re: Need for darcs.debian.org?

On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 03:14:02PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote: > After having read zack's blog entry [2] about the new XS-X-VCS-xxx > field for debian/control files, I was adding it to my packages [3] > (all related to Common Lisp). This is an *excellent* idea, but a terrible way of introducing it.

Problem including (linux-kernel-headers 2.6.17)

Hi, I am trying to prepare packages for the new MaxDB release 7.5.00.38 and am having problems with a new piece of code in there. The code in question looks like this and is known to work on Suse SLES9: ... #ifdef LINUX # include typedef SAPDB_UInt8 u64; # include # include # incl

Contact et distribution

Bonjour, Nous avons commencé une serie d'études sur le lunix et nous voulons en faire le sytème le plus repandu dans notre pays République Démocratique du Congo. Aussi nous vous demandons de nous aider  en nous envoyant 20 cds de Linux débian car nous ne pourrons pas faire des téléchargements. Ces

Processed: Re: Bug#387446: glibc: Please compile for (/usr)/lib64 on amd64 as per FHS

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 387446 general Bug#387446: glibc: Please compile for (/usr)/lib64 on amd64 as per FHS Bug reassigned from package `glibc' to `general'. > retitle 387446: amd64 system not compliant with FHS Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. >

Re: new mplayer

Hello! Cc:ing directly Andrea and Dariush (the Debian maintainer) to be sure they read my post, hope you don't mind. On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:36:16 +0200, A Mennucc wrote: > I prepared a new mplayer (with help from Diego Biurrun of the > mplayer team) From the package description: Mplayer is

Re: new mplayer

Le jeudi 21 septembre 2006 à 10:00 -0600, Joseph Smidt a écrit : > > > On 9/21/06, A Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi > > this mplayer does not contain 'mencoder' the legal status > of mencoder is not clear enough to include it into Debian > > Thanks f

Re: new mplayer

On 9/21/06, A Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hithis mplayer does not contain 'mencoder' the legal statusof mencoder is not clear enough to include it into Debian Thanks for letting me know.  In that case  I will have to look to third party stuff. :(                               Joseph Smi

Need for darcs.debian.org?

Hello! Croos-posting to d-d and the CL-Debian mailing list to let it know about my post, but please answer only on d-d (I set M-F-T and R-T accordingly). After having read zack's blog entry [2] about the new XS-X-VCS-xxx field for debian/control files, I was adding it to my packages [3] (all rela

Re: gfdl gcc documentation packages for non-free: update

On Sep 21, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - the man pages (all except gfortran.1) are not built from >source. -> RC As long as the source is available in the package this is not a bug at all. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: new mplayer

I understand the freeze is probably too soon, but I need mplayer for making movies I need for my physics research.  Please allow this mplayer into Etch. -- -   Joseph Smidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#388613: ITP: libnfnetlink -- Netfilter netlink library

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Max Kellermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libnfnetlink Version : 0.0.16 Upstream Author : Netfilter Core Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.netfilter.org/projects/libnfnetlink/ * License : GPL Descripti

Re: Media players in Debian (was: new mplayer)

On 9/22/06, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Le vendredi 22 septembre 2006 à 12:29 +0200, César Martínez Izquierdo a écrit : > I could never see a whole film using Totem or VLC (from Debian). I don't remember seeing your bug report, could you point me to the bug number please? First

Bug#388614: ITP: libnetfilter-conntrack -- Netfilter netlink-conntrack library

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Max Kellermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libnetfilter-conntrack Version : 0.0.31 Upstream Author : Pablo Neira Ayuso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.netfilter.org/projects/libnetfilter_conntrack/ * License

Bug#388620: ITP: drapes -- a desktop wallpaper managment application for the GNOME desktop

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Francesco Namuri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: drapes Version : 0.4.97 Upstream Author : Milosz Tanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://drapes.mindtouchsoftware.com/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: C# Descri

Re: Media players in Debian (was: new mplayer)

On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 13:03:44 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > I've heard these claims (“player X should be more than good enough, > what do you need mplayer for these days?”) for at least the last five > years Not, "This cannot be played on record^Hmedia player X" ? Tortoise -- Chris L

Bug#388615: ITP: conntrack -- Program to modify the netfilter conntrack tables

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Max Kellermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: conntrack Version : 1.00~beta2 Upstream Author : Pablo Neira Ayuso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.netfilter.org/projects/conntrack/ * License : GPL Description

Bug#388586: /etc/profile contains PATH=/usr/bin/X11...

reassign 388586 base-files found 388586 3.1.16 thanks /etc/profile is installed by the postinst of the base-files package; reassigning appropriately. -- Sam Morris http://robots.org.uk/ PGP key id 1024D/5EA01078 3412 EA18 1277 354B 991B C869 B219 7FDB 5EA0 1078 signature.asc Description: Thi

Processed: re: /etc/profile contains PATH=/usr/bin/X11...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 388586 base-files Bug#388586: /etc/profile contains PATH=/usr/bin/X11... Bug reassigned from package `general' to `base-files'. > found 388586 3.1.16 Bug#388586: /etc/profile contains PATH=/usr/bin/X11... Bug marked as found in version 3.1.16.

Re: Media players in Debian (was: new mplayer)

Le vendredi 22 septembre 2006 à 12:29 +0200, César Martínez Izquierdo a écrit : > I could never see a whole film using Totem or VLC (from Debian). I don't remember seeing your bug report, could you point me to the bug number please? -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' :

Re: Media players in Debian (was: new mplayer)

On Fri, 22 Sep 2006, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: I've heard these claims (ÿÿplayer X should be more than good enough, what do you need mplayer for these days?ÿÿ) for at least the last five years -- it's a difficult claim to refute, since people have rather different viewing habits, different pla

Re: Media players in Debian

"Andrew Donnellan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It would be great if upstream would actually care about legal issues, > licenses and patents in particular. Upstream does care for legal issues, and patents in particular. Check the mplayer development mailing list archive for the last months. > T

it`s all about SOFT Lucienne

Want to see something shocking? Everyone knows it's embarressing for people to talk with their physician about their or their partners private "issues". Well, you don't need to be embarressed. We can offer the pill right to your door and at about one third of the cost. We have hundreds of thous

Bug#388569: general: always printed in letter format

On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 11:13:27 +0200, gerhard oettl wrote: > Since updating to etch some weeks ago i was not able to print > from firefox, because always letter format is requested on the > printer panel. Do you have /etc/papersize and what is its content? $ cat /etc/papersize a4 $ Cf. also man

Re: Media players in Debian (was: new mplayer)

On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 11:12:10AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > And I agree, the tools in Debian are quite good, and I am not sure if > mplayer have much extra to offer these days. I've heard these claims (“player X should be more than good enough, what do you need mplayer for these days?”

Re: new mplayer

Yavor Doganov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I was wondering, what's so important about mplayer? With totem and > vlc (and I anticipate there's something similar for KDE) you have > everything you need. I've never tried mplayer and I don't know how it > looks or what it does, so that's just my un

Re: gfdl gcc documentation packages for non-free: update

> Nikita V. Youshchenko writes: > > Hello. > > > > I've updated gcc-4.1 documentation packages (Section: non-free/doc). > > Packages are no longer debian-native, also several issues have been > > fixed. > > > > Also, I've created gcc-doc-defaults package (Section: contrib/doc) > > that builds gcc-

Re: Media players in Debian (was: new mplayer)

On Friday 22 September 2006 13:29, César Martínez Izquierdo wrote: > I could never see a whole film using Totem or VLC (from Debian). That is interesting assertion. I have very good experience with vlc here. Did you report your issue to the BTS ? > I do, with mplayer (from Marillat). In fact, I'

Re: Media players in Debian (was: new mplayer)

On 9/22/06, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Le vendredi 22 septembre 2006 à 11:19 +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo a écrit : > Mplayer comes with his friend mencoder. I doubt that koffeine, totem, xine, > vlc have something to offer in that regard. VLC does, and we also have ffmpeg fo

Re: Debian cares more about documents than people

On Friday 22 September 2006 00:42, alfredo diega wrote: > On 9/21/06, Thaddeus H. Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I ask you, is that > > fair? > > Well, I guess it isn't fair. Look, have any of you ever sent an email out > of > frustration, then wish you could take it back? I am sorry, I h

Re: gfdl gcc documentation packages for non-free: update

Le jeudi 21 septembre 2006 à 14:32 +0200, Matthias Klose a écrit : > - build-depend on gcc-4.1-source (including the -doc patches), >build the package (bootstrap_target=all), then just package >the documentation. If the source packages still contain some GFDL documents, then this is a RC

Re: Media players in Debian (was: new mplayer)

Le vendredi 22 septembre 2006 à 11:19 +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo a écrit : > Mplayer comes with his friend mencoder. I doubt that koffeine, totem, xine, > vlc have something to offer in that regard. VLC does, and we also have ffmpeg for command-line encoding. GStreamer in Debian currently do

Re: Media players in Debian (was: new mplayer)

On 9/22/06, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yes, I know there won't be w32codecs package in Debian, but even mplayer would be great addition. It would be great if upstream would actually care about legal issues, licenses and patents in particular. This is pretty much the onl

Re: Media players in Debian (was: new mplayer)

On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 11:12:10AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > I was wondering, what's so important about mplayer? With totem and > > vlc (and I anticipate there's something similar for KDE) you have > > everything you need. > > I believe kaffeine is the totem equivalent for KDE. And I

Media players in Debian (was: new mplayer)

[Yavor Doganov] > I was wondering, what's so important about mplayer? With totem and > vlc (and I anticipate there's something similar for KDE) you have > everything you need. I believe kaffeine is the totem equivalent for KDE. And I agree, the tools in Debian are quite good, and I am not sure i

Re: Third and final call for votes for the assets handling constitutional amendment GR

> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > b7af2494-93e2-490e-9312-85647b0928b3 > [ 1 ] Choice 1: Amend the constitution [needs 3:1] > [ 2 ] Choice 2: Further discussion > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -- ENOSIG

Re: gfdl gcc documentation packages for non-free: update

Nikita V. Youshchenko writes: > Hello. > > I've updated gcc-4.1 documentation packages (Section: non-free/doc). > Packages are no longer debian-native, also several issues have been fixed. > > Also, I've created gcc-doc-defaults package (Section: contrib/doc) that > builds gcc-doc, cpp-doc, gfor

Bug#388586: /etc/profile contains PATH=/usr/bin/X11...

Package: general Severity: minor $ reportbug -f /etc/profile Finding package for '/etc/profile'... No packages match. No package specified; stopping. 1. No way to tell how /etc/profile got on my system. 2. All I know is it contains PATH="/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/usr/games" and

Re: Bug#387385: ITP: shed -- Hex editor using ncurses, with a friendly pico-style interface

> No, a bug (or rather, doesn't meet a release goal): > | And these release goals currently: > | - pervasive LFS (large files) support > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/07/> msg5.html Okeydokey. will look into ading this. alex the shed author _